Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5

Relativistic quantum mechanical spin-1 wave equation in 2 + 1 dimensional spacetime

Pages
509–526
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And, we see that the discussion on the Noethercharge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilisticparticle current.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we introduce a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation of the spin-1 particle as anexcited state of the zitterbewegung and show that it is consistent with the 2 + 1 dimensional Proca theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At thesame time, we see that in the rest frame, this equation has two eigenstates; particle and antiparticle states or negativeand positive energy eigenstates, respectively, and satisfy SO(2,1) spin algebra.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And, we see that the discussion on the Noethercharge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilisticparticle current.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we introduce a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation of the spin-1 particle as anexcited state of the zitterbewegung and show that it is consistent with the 2 + 1 dimensional Proca theory. At thesame time, we see that in the rest frame, this equation has two eigenstates; particle and antiparticle states or negativeand positive energy eigenstates, respectively, and satisfy SO(2,1) spin algebra. As practical applications, we derive theexact solutions of the equation in the presence of a constant magnetic field and a curved spacetime background. Fromthese solutions, we find Noether charge by integrating the zeroth component of the spin-1 particle current, called chargedensity, on hyper surface and discuss pair production from this charge. And, we see that the discussion on the Noethercharge is a useful tool for understanding the pair production phenomenon because it is derived from a probabilisticparticle current.

🔖

Cite This Article

SUCU, Y., DOĞAN, S. G., ÜNAL, N., DERNEK, M. (2022). Relativistic quantum mechanical spin-1 wave equation in 2 + 1 dimensional spacetime. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 5, 509–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/613991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Witten, E. Nucl. Phys.B. 1988, 311, 46-78
  2. Witten, E. Nucl. Phys.B. 1989, 323, 113-140
  3. Witten, E. Commun. Math. Phys. 1989, 121, 351-399
  4. Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K.S. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183-191
  5. Binegar, B. J. Math. Phys. 1982, 23, 1511-1517
  6. Witten, E. Commun. Math. Phys. 1991, 137, 29-66
  7. Carlip, S. Quantum gravity in 2 + 1 dimensions; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998
  8. Birmingham, D.; Sachs, I.; Sen, S. Phys. Lett. B 1997, 413, 281-286
  9. Deser, S.; Jackiw, R.; t’Hooft, G. Ann. Phys. 1984, 152, 220-235
  10. Deser, S.; Jackiw, R. Commun. Math. Phys. 1988, 118, 495-509. [11] t’Hooft, G. Commun. Math. Phys. 1988, 117, 685-700
  11. Banados, M.; Teitelboim, C.; Zanelli, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 1849-1851
  12. Brill, D. Lect. Notes Phys. 2000, 537, 143-179
  13. Obukhov, Y., Phys. Rev. D 2003, 68, 124015
  14. Husain, V., Phys. Rev. D 1994, 50, R2361
  15. Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, A. K.; Morozov, S. V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S. V.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Firsov, A. A. Science 2004, 306, 666-669
  16. Castro Neto, A. H.; Guinea, F.; Peres, N. M. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Geim, K. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109-162
  17. De Martino, A.; Dell’Anna, L.; Egger, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 066802
  18. Kosinski, P.; Maslanka, P.; Slawinska, J.; Zasada, I. Prog. Theor. Phys. 2012, 128, 727-739
  19. Bagan, E.; Lavelle, M.; McMullan, D. Phys. Lett. B 2000, 477, 355-360
  20. Nogueira, F. S.; Kleinert, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 176406
  21. Gavrilov, S. P.; Gitman, D. M. Phys. Rev. D 1996, 53, 7162-7175
  22. Gavrilov, S. P.; Gitman, D. M.; Smirnov, A. A. J. Math. Phys. 2004, 45, 1873-1886
  23. Khalilov, V. R. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 71, 012105
  24. Khalilov, V. R. Eur. Phys. J. C 2014, 74, 3061
  25. Khalilov, V. R.; Mamsurov, I. V. Eur. Phys. J. C 2015, 75, 167
  26. Sucu, Y.; Ünal, N. J. Math. Phys. 2007, 48, 052503
  27. Gecim, G.; Sucu, Y. J. Cosmol. Astropart. P. 2013, 2, 023
  28. Gecim, G.; Sucu, Y. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2015, 357, 105
  29. Gecim, G.; Kucukakca, Y; Sucu, Y. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 2015, 567395
  30. Gecim, G.; Sucu Y. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 2017, 2056131
  31. Petiau, G. Acad. Roy. de Belg. Classe Sci. Mem in 8 ◦ 16, 1936
  32. Duffin, R. J. Phys. Rev. 1938, 54, 1114
  33. Kemmer, N. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 1939, 173, 91-116
  34. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C. J. Phys. G 1993, 19, 87-98
  35. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C. J. Phys. A 1994, 27, 4301-4315
  36. Nedjadi, Y.; Barrett, R. C.