Journals / Turkish Journal of Physics / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Lattice calculations for two-component fermion systems with unequal masses: one dimension

Pages
631–640
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We find that theseuniversal scattering lengths increase logarithmically with the mass ratio m↑/m↓ .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We consider systems of two-component fermions with unequal masses and interacting via a short-rangeattractive potential.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We discuss the case where the two-component fermions form a shallow dimer with large scatteringlength.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We find that theseuniversal scattering lengths increase logarithmically with the mass ratio m↑/m↓ .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We consider systems of two-component fermions with unequal masses and interacting via a short-rangeattractive potential. We discuss the case where the two-component fermions form a shallow dimer with large scatteringlength. The three-fermion and four-fermion systems with such properties are universal and characterized by the twofermion scattering length aff and the ratio of the mass of spin-↑ fermion to the mass of spin-↓ fermion, m↑/m↓ . In thisstudy, using lattice effective field theory, we analyze fermion-dimer and dimer-dimer systems and calculate the universalfermion-dimer and dimer-dimer scattering lengths for various values of the mass ratio m↑/m↓ . We find that theseuniversal scattering lengths increase logarithmically with the mass ratio m↑/m↓ .

🔖

Cite This Article

ELHATISARI, S. (2022). Lattice calculations for two-component fermion systems with unequal masses: one dimension. Turkish Journal of Physics, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 631–640. https://ajindex.com/articles/613983

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Braaten, E; Hammer, H. W. Phys. Rept. 2006, 428, 259-390. [2] van Kolck, U. Nucl. Phys. A 1999, 645, 273-302
  2. Feshbach, H. Annals Phys. 2000, 281, 519-546
  3. Chin, C.; Grimm, R.; Julienne, P.; Tiesinga, E. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010, 82, 1225-1286
  4. Levinsen, J.; Petrov, D. S. Eur. Phys. J. D 2011, 65, 67-82
  5. Elhatisari, S.; Katterjohn, K.; Lee, D.; Meißner, U. G.; Rupak, G. Phys. Lett. B 2017, 768, 337-344
  6. Lee, D. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2009, 63, 117-154
  7. Lüscher, M. Commun. Math. Phys. 1986, 105, 153-188
  8. Lüscher, M. Nucl. Phys. B 1991, 354, 531-578
  9. Borasoy, B.; Epelbaum; E.; Krebs, H.; Lee, D.; Meißner, U. G. Eur. Phys. J. A 2007, 34, 185-196
  10. Rokash, A.; Pine, M.; Elhatisari, S.; Lee, D.; Epelbaum, E.; Krebs, H. Phys. Rev. C 2015, 92, 054612
  11. Lu, B. N.; Lähde, T. A.; Lee,D.; Meißner, U. G. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 760, 309-313
  12. Lanczos, C. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1950, 45, 255-282
  13. Bour, S.; Koenig, S.; Lee, D.; Hammer, H. W.; Meißner, U. G. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 091503
  14. Bethe, H. Z. Phys. 1931, 71, 205-226
  15. Rokash, A.; Epelbaum, E.; Krebs, H.; Lee, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 232502.