Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Secondary School Students’ Performance and Opinions Towards Activities Based on Engineering Design Process

Pages
844–872
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, all the students had positive views related to the implementation of the engineering design process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The purpose of this study was to investigate secondary school students’ performance and views in activities based on the engineering design process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From the two selected secondary schools, 48 students voluntarily participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, all the students had positive views related to the implementation of the engineering design process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Engineering Design Process · Secondary School

Özet

Öz The purpose of this study was to investigate secondary school students’ performance and views in activities based on the engineering design process. From the two selected secondary schools, 48 students voluntarily participated in this study. For each school, six students were selected from each of the grades 5, 6, 7, and 8. In this study, a case study approach was used which is one of the types of qualitative research design. Four different situations were considered from a holistic approach in two different schools. To obtain the data, qualitative data collection techniques were chosen. The observation, interview forms were analysed through descriptive analysis. Two researchers implemented the activities based on the engineering design process to all the groups. In the first week, the students were informed about the engineering design process. The following weeks, the students worked in groups and undertook the activities designed by the researchers for each grade level in accordance with the relevant units. The results of this study revealed that students at lower grades had difficulty identifying the problem, obtaining the data, drawing the design, using the materials, and redesigning steps. However, all the students had positive views related to the implementation of the engineering design process.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÜRMELİ, H., Yıldırım, M., GÖCÜK, A., SEVGİ, Y. (2018). Secondary School Students’ Performance and Opinions Towards Activities Based on Engineering Design Process. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 844–872. https://ajindex.com/articles/6139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET; 2010). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET. Retrieved 01.10.2017 from http://www.mcrit.com/enginycat/XF/RTK/ABET.pdfApedoe,
  2. X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: The heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454-465Bairaktarova D., Cox, M. F., Evangelou, D. (2011) Leadership training in science, technology, engineering and mathematics education in Bulgaria. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36, 6, 585-594.Car, R.L., Strobel, J. (2011). Integrating Engineering Design Challenges into Secondary STEM Education. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education, Retrieved 23.01.2018 from www.ncete.org Corbett, K.S. (2012). The engineering design process as a model for STEM curriculum design. Doctoral Thesis, College of Engineering and Science Lousiana Tech University. Cunningham, C. M., Hester, K. (2007). Engineering is elementary: an engineering and technology curriculum for children. In: Proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.Davis, D.C., Gentili, K.L., Trevison, N.S., Christianson, R.K., McCauley, J.F. (2000). Measuring Learning Outcomes for Engineering Design Education. Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition. Retrieved 22.01.2018 from https://peer.asee.org/measuring-learning-outcomes-for-engineering-design-education.pdf
  3. Dawes, L., Rasmussen, G. (2007). Activity and engagement—keys in connecting engineering with secondary school students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 13(1), 13–20.De Biase, K. (2016). Teacher preparation in science, technology, engineering and mathematics instruction. Doctoral Thesis, California State University, Department of Educational Leadership.Denson, C.D. (2011). Building a Framework for Engineering Design Experiences in STEM: A Synthesis. Utah State University Publications. Paper 169. Retrieved 22.01.2018 from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_publications/169
  4. Dux, H.A.D. (2015). Introducing engineering in elementary education: A 5-year study of teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1015–1019
  5. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2006). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. IEEE