In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this exploratory research study investigates the influence of AR on teacher cognition.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Conducting action research (AR) is considered important for teachers’ professional development, their actual teaching practice and their theoretical knowledge .
📊
Key Findings & Data:Very few, if any, however, has investigated teachers’ deliberate decision-making processes after action research processes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this exploratory research study investigates the influence of AR on teacher cognition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler action research · teacher education · in-service teachers
Özet
Öz Conducting action research (AR) is considered important for teachers’ professional development, their actual teaching practice and their theoretical knowledge . However, for many teachers, research is a new challenge and action research an unfamiliar form of classroom research. AR is a process through which practitioners address issues of importance in their practice. The interface between AR and teacher cognition can advance our understanding of teaching practice in general. Very few, if any, however, has investigated teachers’ deliberate decision-making processes after action research processes. In an attempt to address this gap in literature, this exploratory research study investigates the influence of AR on teacher cognition.
Yigitoglu, N., Dollar, Y. K. (2018). Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 694–709. https://ajindex.com/articles/6133
Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers' knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48 (1), 136-163.
Bartels, N. (2001). Professional preparation and action research: Only for language teachers? TESOL Quarterly, 36 (1), 71-78.
Bausch, L. (2010). The power of teachers' writing stories: exploring multiple layers of reflective inquiry in writing process education. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 6(1), 20-39.
Berger, J. G., Boles, K. C., Troen, V. (2005). Teacher research and school change: paradoxes, problems, and possibilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 93–105.
Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 55(1), 21-29.
Borg, S. (2003a). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
Borg, S. (2003b). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review. Language Awareness, 12(3), 96-108.
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum. Burns, A. (2009). Action Research in Second Language Teacher Education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 289-298). New York: Cambridge. Crookes, G. (1993). Action Research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 130-144.
Doyle, M. (1997). Beyond life history as a student: preservice teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning. College Student Journal, 31(4), 519-532.
Ebbutt, D. (1985) Educational action research: some general concerns and specific quibbles. In R. Burgess (Ed.) Issues in educational research: qualitative methods. Lewes: The Falmer Press.
Edge, J. (Ed.) (2001).
Action Research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL. Farrell, T. S. C., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: a case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13.
Goetz, Z. & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Gustavsen, B., Hannson, A., & Qvale, T. U. (2008). Action research and the challenge of scope. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds). The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (2nd Ed.) (pp. 63-77). London: Sage Publications. Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three a