Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2015 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in late preterm infants at term-equivalent age

Pages
40–44
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Late preterm birth does not appear to have marked effects on neonatal BAER or development of the brainstem

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in late preterm infants at term-equivalent age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turk J Pediatr 2015; 57: 40-44.To detect differences between late preterm and term infants in the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) variables that predispose to neurodevelopmental abnormalities, 36 late preterm infants and 87 term infants were recruited.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Late preterm birth does not appear to have marked effects on neonatal BAER or development of the brainstem
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Jo CK, Kim MJ. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in late preterm infants at term-equivalent age. Turk J Pediatr 2015; 57: 40-44.To detect differences between late preterm and term infants in the brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) variables that predispose to neurodevelopmental abnormalities, 36 late preterm infants and 87 term infants were recruited. Data collected with the click level at 70 dB nHL were used for analysis. The latencies of waves I (2.74±0.20 msec vs. 2.74±0.42 msec), III (5.55±0.33 msec vs. 5.53±0.45 msec) and V (7.55±0.34 msec vs. 7.59±0.44 msec), and the interpeak intervals for late preterm infants were similar to those for term infants. There were no significant differences between late preterm and term infants in amplitudes I (0.26±0.11 µV vs. 0.24±0.10 µV) and V (0.25±0.06 µV vs. 0.28±0.11 µV), and in the V/I amplitude ratio (1.10±0.47 vs. 1.23±0.46). There were no significant differences in the BAER variables between late preterm infants and term infants. Late preterm birth does not appear to have marked effects on neonatal BAER or development of the brainstem

🔖

Cite This Article

JO, C., KİM, M. (2022). Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in late preterm infants at term-equivalent age. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 40–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/613269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sleifer P, da Costa SS, Cóser PL, Goldani MZ, Dornelles C, Weiss K. Auditory brainstem response in premature and full-term children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71: 1449-1456.
  2. Rance G, Tomlin D. Maturation of auditory steady-state responses in normal babies. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 20-29.
  3. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wu YY, Wilkinson AR. Relative maturation of peripheral and central regions of the human brainstem from preterm to term and the influence of preterm birth. Pediatr Res 2009; 65: 657- 662. Jiang ZD, Wilkinson AR. Normal brainstem responses in moderately preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 1366-1369.
  4. Yin R, Wilkinson AR, Chen C, Brosi DM, Jiang ZD. No close correlation between brainstem auditory function and peripheral auditory threshold in preterm infants at term age. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 791-795.
  5. Pasman JW, Rotteveel JJ, de Graaf R, Stegeman DF, Visco YM. The effect of preterm birth on brainstem, middle latency and cortical auditory evoked responses (BMC AERs). Early Hum Dev 1992; 31: 113-129.
  6. Pasman JW, Rotteveel JJ, de Graaf R, Maassen B, Vicso YM. The effects of early and late preterm birth on brainstem and middle-latency auditory evoked responses in children with normal neurodevelopment. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 13: 234-241.
  7. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wilkinson AR. Auditory neural responses to click stimuli of different rates in the brainstem of very preterm babies at term. Pediatr Res 2002; 51: 454-459. deRegnier RA. Neurophysiologic evaluation of brain function in extremely premature newborn infants. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 2-10.
  8. Wilkinson AR, Jiang ZD. Brainstem auditory evoked response in neonatal neurology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 11: 444-451.
  9. Jiang ZD, Brosi DM, Wang J, Wilkinson AR. Brainstem auditory-evoked responses to different rates of clicks in small-for-gestational age preterm infants at term. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93: 76-81.
  10. Jiang ZD, Yin R, Shao XM, Wilkinson AR. Brain-stem auditory impairment during the neonatal period in term infants after asphyxia: dynamic changes in brain-stem auditory evoked response to clicks of different rates. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 1605-1615.
  11. Don M, Kwong B. Auditory brainstem response: differential diagnosis. In: Katz J (ed). Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2002: 274-297.
  12. Choi HJ, Lee TH, Oh KW, Kim HM. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) results in NICU graduates. Korean J Pediatr 2006; 49: 1301-1307.
  13. Chadha S, Bais AS. Auditory