Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2016 / Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2

Functional outcomes of mandibular distraction for the relief of severe airway obstruction and feeding difficulties in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence

Pages
159–167
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thirteen neonates with Pierre Robin sequence who underwentbilateral mandibular distraction between 2010 and 2013 for relief of theirsevere airway obstruction or feeding problems were retrospectively reviewed.The mean preoperative and postoperative airway diameters were 3.89±1.64and 9.03±1.98 mm. respectively and significant difference was observed withdistraction (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to review the application of mandibulardistraction to relieve severe airway obstruction or feeding problems ofneonates.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to review the application of mandibulardistraction to relieve severe airway obstruction or feeding problems ofneonates.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thirteen neonates with Pierre Robin sequence who underwentbilateral mandibular distraction between 2010 and 2013 for relief of theirsevere airway obstruction or feeding problems were retrospectively reviewed.The mean preoperative and postoperative airway diameters were 3.89±1.64and 9.03±1.98 mm. respectively and significant difference was observed withdistraction (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the application of mandibulardistraction to relieve severe airway obstruction or feeding problems ofneonates. Thirteen neonates with Pierre Robin sequence who underwentbilateral mandibular distraction between 2010 and 2013 for relief of theirsevere airway obstruction or feeding problems were retrospectively reviewed.The mean preoperative and postoperative airway diameters were 3.89±1.64and 9.03±1.98 mm. respectively and significant difference was observed withdistraction (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIŞ, M., KONAŞ, E., YURDAKÖK, M., TUNÇBİLEK, G., YİĞİT, Ş., KORKMAZ, A., BİTİK, O. (2022). Functional outcomes of mandibular distraction for the relief of severe airway obstruction and feeding difficulties in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 58 - Sayı: 2, 159–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/613220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Papoff P, Guelfi G, Cicchetti R, et al. Outcomes after tongue-lip adhesion or mandibular distraction osteogenesis in infants with Pierre Robin sequence and severe airway obstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42: 1418-1423
  2. Caouette-Laberge L, Bayet B, Larocque Y. The Pierre Robin sequence: review of 125 cases and evolution of treatment modalities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93: 934-942
  3. Mobin SS, Francis CS, Karatsonyi AL, et al. Mandibular distraction instead of tracheostomy in Pierre Robin sequence patients: is it worth it? Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 766e-767e
  4. Demke J, Bassim M, Patel MR, et al. Parental perceptions and morbidity: tracheostomy and Pierre Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 72: 1509-1516
  5. Denny A, Amm C. New technique for airway correction in neonates with severe Pierre Robin sequence. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 97-101
  6. Schaefer RB, Stadler JA 3rd, Gosain AK. To distract or not to distract: an algorithm for airway management in isolated Pierre Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1113-1125
  7. Rankow RM, Minervini F. Micrognathia in the newborn: Pierre Robin syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1960; 25: 606-614
  8. Parsons RW, Smith DJ. A modified tongue-lip adhesion for Pierre Robin anomalad. Cleft Palate J 1980; 17: 144-147
  9. Stevenson DA, Carey JC. A novel multiple congenital anomaly-mental retardation syndrome with Pierre Robin sequence and cerebellar hypoplasia in two sisters. Am J Med Genet A 2007; 143A: 2221-2226
  10. Evans KN, Sie KC, Hopper RA, et al. Robin sequence: from diagnosis to development of an effective management plan. Pediatrics 2011; 127: 936-948
  11. Dauria D, Marsh JL. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for Pierre Robin sequence: what percentage of neonates need it? J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19: 1237-1243
  12. Jakobsen LP, Knudsen MA, Lespinasse J, et al. The genetic basis of the Pierre Robin Sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43: 155-159
  13. Marques IL, de Sousa TV, Carneiro AF, et al. Clinical experience with infants with Robin sequence: a prospective study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38: 171-178
  14. Delorme RP, Larocque Y, Caouette-Laberge L. Innovative surgical approach for the Pierre Robin anomalad: subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth musculature. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83: 960-964; discussion 965-966
  15. Tomaski SM, Zalzal GH, Saal HM. Airway obstruction in the Pierre Robin sequence. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 111-114