Journals / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 5

Gender-related differences in etiology of organic central precocious puberty

Pages
763–769
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The likelihood of novel intracranial pathology associated with CPP is quite low in girls with an onset after six years of age and in boys with an onset after seven years of age.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Central precocious puberty (CPP) is idiopathic in 90% of girls and 60% of boys, while some cases are caused by lesions of central nervous system (CNS), a condition often referred to as organic CPP.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Medical files of 256 girls and 120 boys diagnosed and treated for CPP in a single center in the last two decades were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The likelihood of novel intracranial pathology associated with CPP is quite low in girls with an onset after six years of age and in boys with an onset after seven years of age.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background. Central precocious puberty (CPP) is idiopathic in 90% of girls and 60% of boys, while some cases are caused by lesions of central nervous system (CNS), a condition often referred to as organic CPP. We aimed to analyze the etiology of organic CPP in a large cohort of girls and boys and determine gender-related differences. Methods. Medical files of 256 girls and 120 boys diagnosed and treated for CPP in a single center in the last two decades were reviewed. Patients were classified into four groups with respect to previous history and MRI findings: (1) previously established CNS pathology at the time of diagnosis, (2) novel CNS pathology previously asymptomatic, (3) incidentalomas considered to be unrelated to CPP, and (4) completely normal MRI. Group 1 and 2 were considered as organic CPP whereas group 3 and 4 were considered as idiopathic CPP.Results. Prevalence of CNS pathology was significantly higher in boys than girls (21.7% vs 6.2%). Previous CNS pathologies such as developmental anomaly of CNS, parenchymal injury, necrotic lesions and hydrocephalus were present in 3.5% of girls and 8.3% of boys. Prevalence of novel CNS pathology as determined by imaging among neurologically asymptomatic patients was 2.8% in girls and 14.5% in boys. The most common novel CNS pathologies in boys were hamartomas (5%) and suprasellar arachnoid cysts (3.3%); which were significantly lower in girls (0.8 and 0.8% respectively). Onset of organic CPP was before six years in girls, and seven years in boys.Conclusions. Organic CPP was 3.5 times more common in boys compared to girls. It is possible to detect an underlying CNS pathology in one out of every five boys with CPP. Frequency and distribution of organic etiology also differ between girls and boys, hypothalamic hamartomas and suprasellar arachnoid cysts being more common in boys than girls. The likelihood of novel intracranial pathology associated with CPP is quite low in girls with an onset after six years of age and in boys with an onset after seven years of age.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÖN, A., VURALLI, D., ALİKAŞİFOĞLU, A., GÖNÇ, E. N., KANDEMİR, N., OĞUZ, K. K. (2022). Gender-related differences in etiology of organic central precocious puberty. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 5, 763–769. https://ajindex.com/articles/613081

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cisternino M, Arrigo T, Pasquino AM, et al. Etiology and age incidence of precocious puberty in girls: a multicentric study. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000
  2. 13(Suppl 1): 695-701. 2.Chemaitilly W, Trivin C, Adan L, Gall V, Sainte-Rose C, Brauner R. Central precocious puberty: clinical and laboratory features. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2001
  3. Chalumeau M, Hadjiathanasiou CG, Ng SM, et al. Selecting girls with precocious puberty for brain imaging: validation of European evidence-based diagnosis rule. J Pediatr 2003
  4. Pescovitz OH, Comite F, Hench K, et al. The NIH experience with precocious puberty: diagnostic subgroups and response to short-term luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogue therapy. J Pediatr 1986
  5. Desai M, Colaco MP, Choksi CS, Ambadkar MC, Vaz FE, Gupte C. Isosexual precocity: the clinical and etiologic profile. Indian Pediatr 1993
  6. Alikasifoglu A, Vuralli D, Gonc EN, Ozon A, Kandemir N. Changing etiological trends in male precocious puberty: evaluation of 100 cases with central precocious puberty over the last decade. Horm Res Paediatr 2015
  7. Neely EK, Hintz RL, Wilson DM, et al. Normal ranges for immunochemiluminometric gonadotropin assays. J Pediatr 1995
  8. Neely EK, Wilson DM, Lee PA, Stene M, Hintz RL. Spontaneous serum gonadotropin concentrations in the evaluation of precocious puberty. J Pediatr 1995
  9. Carel JC, Lahlou N, Roger M, Chaussain JL. Precocious puberty and statural growth. Hum Reprod Update 2004
  10. Rosenfield RL, Cooke DW, Radovick S. Puberty and its disorders in a female. In: Sperling MA (ed). Pediatric Endocrinology (3rd ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2008: 573-590. 11.Marshall WA, Tanner JM. Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child 1969
  11. Brito VN, Spinola-Castro AM, Kochi C, Kopacek C, Silva PC, Guerra-Junior G. Central precocious puberty: revisiting the diagnosis and therapeutic management. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2016
  12. Milner GR, Levick RK, Kay R. Assessment of bone age: a comparison of the greulich and pyle, and the tanner and whitehouse methods. Clin Radiol 1986
  13. De Sanctis V, Corrias A, Rizzo V, et al. Etiology of central precocious puberty in males: the results of the Italian Study Group for Physiopathology of Puberty. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000
  14. 13(Suppl 1): 687-693. 15.Topor LS, Bowerman K, Machan JT, Gilbert CL, Kangarloo T,