Journals / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Cephalometric Variables Prediction from Lateral Photographs Between Different Skeletal Patterns Using Regression Artificial Neural Networks

Pages
101–111
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study suggests that artificial intelligence would be useful as an accurate method in orthodontics for the prediction of cephalometric variables and its performance was achieved by several factors such as proper selection of the input data, preferable generalization, and organization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to design an artificial neural network for the prediction of cephalometric variables via a lateral photograph in skeletal Class I, II, and III patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 94 patients were recruited for this prospective study, with an age range of 15-20 years (41 boys and 53 girls) seeking orthodontic treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study suggests that artificial intelligence would be useful as an accurate method in orthodontics for the prediction of cephalometric variables and its performance was achieved by several factors such as proper selection of the input data, preferable generalization, and organization.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to design an artificial neural network for the prediction of cephalometric variables via a lateral photograph in skeletal Class I, II, and III patterns. Methods: A total of 94 patients were recruited for this prospective study, with an age range of 15-20 years (41 boys and 53 girls) seeking orthodontic treatment. According to cephalometric analysis, using AutoCAD 21.0, they were allocated into three groups. Thirty with skeletal Class I (14 boys and 16 girls), 34 with skeletal Class II (14 boys and 20 girls), and 30 with skeletal Class III malocclusion (13 boys and 17 girls) according to SNA, SNB, and ANB angles measured from cephalometric radiographs. The study includes (1) finding the correlation of the skeletal measurements between lateral profile photographs and cephalometric radiographs for the recruited patients and (2) designing a specific artificial neural networks for the assessment of skeletal factors via lateral photographs, these artificial neural networks are trained and tested with the total of 94 standard lateral cephalograms. Results: This novel Network provided models of regression that can forecast the cephalometric variables through analogous photographic measurements with excellent predictive power R = 0.99 and limited estimation error for each malocclusion (Class I, II, and III). Conclusion: This study suggests that artificial intelligence would be useful as an accurate method in orthodontics for the prediction of cephalometric variables and its performance was achieved by several factors such as proper selection of the input data, preferable generalization, and organization.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİ, S. M., TAWFEEQ, M. A., SALOOM, H. F. (2022). Cephalometric Variables Prediction from Lateral Photographs Between Different Skeletal Patterns Using Regression Artificial Neural Networks. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 101–111. https://ajindex.com/articles/613060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Halazonetis DJ. Morphometric correlation between facialsoft-tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children andadolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007
  2. 132(4):450-457. [CrossRef] 2. Kale-Varlk S. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Anatolian Turkish adults. J Craniofac Surg. 2008
  3. 19(6):1481-1486. [CrossRef] 3. Han K, Kwon HJ, Choi TH, Kim JH, Son D. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010
  4. 38(2):96-107. [CrossRef] 4. Graber TM. Patient photography in orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 1946
  5. Vyas MB. Photography: a diagnostic tool. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ. 2018
  6. 10(2):59-60. [CrossRef] 6. Bittner C, Pancherz H. Facial morphology and malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990
  7. 97(4):308-315. [CrossRef] 7. Mladenović, Dragan, Mladenović L, Mladenović S. Importance of digital dental photography in the practice of dentistry. Acta Fac Med Naissensis. 2010
  8. 27(2):75-79. 8. Su MC, Chang HT. A new model of self-organizing neural networks and its application in data projection. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2001
  9. 12(1):153-158. [CrossRef] 9. Perfetti R, Ricci E. Analog neural network for support vector machine learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2006
  10. 17(4):1085-1091. [CrossRef] 10. Yaji A, Prasad S, Pai A. Artificial intelligence in dento-maxillofacial radiology. Acta Sci Dent Sci. 2019
  11. Xie X, Wang L, Wang A. Artificial neural network modeling for deciding if extractions are necessary prior to orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010
  12. 80(2):262-266. [CrossRef] 12. Nanda SB, Kalha AS, Jena AK, Bhatia V, Mishra S. Artificial neural network (ANN) modeling and analysis for the prediction of change in the lip curvature following extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment. J Dent Spec. 2015
  13. 3(2):130-139. [CrossRef] 13. Budiman JA. Use of artificial neuron network to predict dental arch form. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2018
  14. 18(1):e3978. 14. Moate SJ, Geenty JP, Shen G, Darendeliler MA. A newcraniofacial diagnostic technique: the Sydney diagnostic system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007
  15. 131(3):334-342. [CrossRef] 15. Gomes, Horta, Gandini, Gonc¸ Alves. Photographic assessment of cephalometric measurements. Angle Orthod. 2013
  16. 83(6):1049-1058. [CrossRef] 16. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orth