SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

The effect of the pooling method on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria

Bologna kriterlerine uyan zayıf cevaplı kadınlarda havuz yönteminin gebelik sonuçlarına etkisi

Serdar ÇELİK
Mustafa BAHÇECİ
Sevim PURİSA
Kübra BOYNUKALIN
Niyazi Emre TURGUT
Erbil YAĞMUR
Dilek Cengiz ÇELİK
Remzi ABALI
Pages
39–45
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pooling embryo transfer (ET) group had 110 andfresh ET group had 145 patients.Results: Although, age was similar between both treatment groups (p=0.31), antral follicle count (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Pooling is an alternative method to achieve in vitro fertilization outcomes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was to investigate the effect of pooling method onpregnancy outcomes in poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria.Materials and Methods: Two hundred-fifty five poor responder patients were enrolled in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pooling embryo transfer (ET) group had 110 andfresh ET group had 145 patients.Results: Although, age was similar between both treatment groups (p=0.31), antral follicle count (p
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Pooling is an alternative method to achieve in vitro fertilization outcomes. This study was to investigate the effect of pooling method onpregnancy outcomes in poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria.Materials and Methods: Two hundred-fifty five poor responder patients were enrolled in this study. Pooling embryo transfer (ET) group had 110 andfresh ET group had 145 patients.Results: Although, age was similar between both treatment groups (p=0.31), antral follicle count (p

Özet

Amaç: İn vitro fertilizasyon sonuçlarının elde edilmesinde havuz yöntemi bir alternatiftir. Bu çalışma, Bologna kriterlerine göre kötü yanıt veren hastalarda havuz yönteminin gebelik sonuçları üzerine etkisini araştırmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya iki yüz elli beş zayıf cevaplı hasta alındı. Havuz embriyo transfer (ET) grubunda 110, taze ET grubunda 145 hasta vardı. Bulguar: Her iki tedavi grubu arasında yaş benzer olmakla birlikte (p=0,34), antral folikül sayısı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, S., BAHÇECİ, M., PURİSA, S., BOYNUKALIN, K., TURGUT, N. E., YAĞMUR, E., ÇELİK, D. C., ABALI, R. (2022). The effect of the pooling method on the live birth rate in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 39–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/613026

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Vlahos N, Papalouka M, Triantafyllidou O, Vlachos A, Vakas P, Grimbizis G, et al. Dehydroepiandrosterone administration before IVF in poor responders: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:191-6.
  2. Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJ, Broekmans FJ, Broer SL. The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor?: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18:1-11.
  3. Zhen XM, Qiao J, Li R, Wang LN, Liu P. The clinical analysis of poor ovarian response in in-vitro-fertilization embryo-transfer among Chinese couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:17-22.
  4. Chang EM, Han JE, Won HJ, Kim YS, Yoon TK, Lee WS. Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:225-30.
  5. Nardo LG, Fleming R, Howles CM, Bosch E, Hamamah S, Ubaldi FM, et al. Conventional ovarian stimulation no longer exists: welcome to the age of individualized ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biomed Online 2011;23:141-8.
  6. Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Eftekhar T. Adjuvant growth hormone therapy in antagonist protocol in poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:1017-21.
  7. Sites CK, St Marie P, Rahil T. Implantation of fresh and thawedwarmed embryos in single embryo transfer cycles: interpreting the initial beta-HCG. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:319-21.
  8. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99:156-62.
  9. Baker VL, Brown MB, Luke B, Conrad KP. Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2015;103:931-8. e2. Karande V, Gleicher N. A rational approach to the management of low responders in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1744-8.
  10. Frattarelli JL, Hill MJ, McWilliams GD, Miller KA, Bergh PA, Scott RT Jr. A luteal estradiol protocol for expected poor-responders improves embryo number and quality. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1118-22. Epub 2007 Jul 20 Demirol A, Gurgan T. Comparison of microdose flare-up and antagonist multiple-dose protocols for poor-responder patients: a randomized study. Fertil Steril 2009;92:481-5.
  11. Massin N, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Coussieu C, Galey-Fontaine J, Wolf JP, Hugues JN. Effects of transdermal testosterone application on the ovarian response to FSH in