Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2019 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Effects of reviewing childbirth scenarios on choice of delivery type: a randomized controlled trial

Doğum senaryolarını gözden geçirmenin doğum şekli seçimine etkileri: randomize kontrollü bir çalışma

Pages
15–22
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the relative risks of CS decision in the scenario and TPB groups in comparison with the control group were both 0.87 and statistically significant (p=0.018 and p=0.013, respectively).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The incidence of cesarean section (CS) was estimated as about 48% between 2000 and 2012 in Iran.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted to assess the effects of reviewing written childbirth scenarios on the selection of delivery method.Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Shohada Women’s Hospital in Behshahr, Mazandaran, Iran, from May to December 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the relative risks of CS decision in the scenario and TPB groups in comparison with the control group were both 0.87 and statistically significant (p=0.018 and p=0.013, respectively).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of cesarean section (CS) was estimated as about 48% between 2000 and 2012 in Iran. This study was conducted to assess the effects of reviewing written childbirth scenarios on the selection of delivery method.Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Shohada Women’s Hospital in Behshahr, Mazandaran, Iran, from May to December 2015. A total of 223 women at 28 to 32 weeks of gestation were randomly allocated into three groups; the standard care (control), theory of planned behavior (TPB)-based education, and TPB education plus additional support via written childbirth scenarios (scenario). Participants were assessed at baseline (weeks 28-32) and intervention (week 37 of pregnancy) periods. Both intervention groups (TPB and scenario groups) participated in three learning sessions that were based on TPB, whereas the control group received routine care service.Results: The frequencies of normal vaginal delivery (NVD) in the scenario, TPB, and control groups were 73.2%, 58.5%, and 45.7%, respectively(p=0.004). The results showed that the relative risks of CS decision in the scenario and TPB groups in comparison with the control group were both 0.87 and statistically significant (p=0.018 and p=0.013, respectively). The relative risk of choosing CS after the removal of obligatory CS cases in the scenario group compared with the control was 0.85.Conclusion: Written childbirth scenarios that contain information on NVD and CS as additional support are effective educational tools for reducing CSrates.

Özet

Amaç: İran’da, 2000-2012 yılları arasında sezaryen doğum (SD) insidansının yaklaşık %48 olduğu tahmin edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada, yazılı doğum senaryolarının gözden geçirilmesinin doğum yönteminin seçimine etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu randomize kontrollü çalışma, Mayıs-Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında, İran’ın Mazandaran Eyaleti Behshahr kentindeki Shohada Kadın Hastanesi’nde yürütüldü. Gebeliğinin 28 ila 32. haftasında olan toplam 223 kadın rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı. Bunlar; standart bakım (kontrol), planlanmış davranış teorisi temelli eğitim (PDT) ve PDT artı yazılı doğum senaryoları ile ek destek (senaryo) idi. Katılımcılar başlangıç (28-32. hafta) ve müdahale (gebeliğin 37. haftası) dönemlerinde değerlendirildi. Her iki müdahale grubu da (PDT ve senaryo grupları) PDT temelli üç öğrenme oturumuna katılmış, kontrol grubu ise rutin bakım hizmeti almıştır.Bulgular: Normal vajinal doğum (NVD) sıklığı senaryo, PDT ve kontrol gruplarında sırasıyla %73,2, %58,5 ve %45,7 idi (p=0,004). Bulgular, senaryo ve PDT gruplarındaki SD kararının kontrol grubuyla karşılaştırıldığında göreceli risklerin her ikisinde 0,87 ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir (sırasıyla p=0,018 ve p=0,013). Senaryo grubundaki zorunlu SD olgularının çıkarılmasının ardından kontrole kıyasla SD seçiminde göreceli risk 0,85 idi.Sonuç: NVD ve ek destek olarak SD hakkında bilgi içeren yazılı doğum senaryoları, SD oranlarını azaltmak için etkili eğitim araçlarıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

RASOLI, M., MIRREZAIE, S. M., FOOLADI, E., HOSSEINI, R. Z., FAYAZ, M. (2022). Effects of reviewing childbirth scenarios on choice of delivery type: a randomized controlled trial. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/613007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World health report 2010;30:1-31
  2. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PloS one 2016;11:e0148343
  3. Azami-Aghdash S, Ghojazadeh M, Dehdilani N, Mohammadi M, Asl Amin Abad R. Prevalence and Causes of Cesarean Section in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health 2014;43:545-55. PubMed PMID: 26060756. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4449402. Epub 2015/06/11. eng
  4. Eslami S, Aslani A, Tara F, Ghalichi L, Erfanian F, Abu-Hanna A. The impact of a computerized decision aid on empowering pregnant women for choosing vaginal versus cesarean section delivery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;03;16:549. PubMed PMID: 26634922. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4669643. Epub 2015/12/05. eng
  5. Edmonds JK, Cwiertniewicz T, Stoll K. Childbirth Education Prior to Pregnancy? Survey Findings of Childbirth Preferences and Attitudes Among Young Women. J Perinat Educ 2015;24:93-101. PubMed PMID: 26957892. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4744342. Epub 2015/01/01. eng
  6. Boz I, Teskereci G, Akman G. How did you choose a mode of birth?Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey. Women Birth 2016;29:359-67. PubMed PMID: 26846560. Epub 2016/02/06. eng
  7. Hauck YL, Stoll KH, Hall WA, Downie J. Association between childbirth attitudes and fear on birth preferences of a future geAnuesrtartaiolinan o f parents. Women Birth 2016;29:511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 24. PubMed PMID: 27233945. Epub 2016/05/29. eng
  8. McCants BM, Greiner JR. Prebirth Education and Childbirth Decision Making. International Journal of Childbirth Education 2016;31
  9. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice: John Wiley & Sons; 2008
  10. Sharma M. Theoretical foundations of health education and health promotion: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2016
  11. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. De Young 1991:509- 26
  12. Nichols FH, Humenick SS. Childbirth education: practice, research and theory: WB Saunders Company; 2000
  13. Bremner MN, Aduddell K, Bennett DN, VanGeest JB. The use