SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?

Sezaryen skar gebelik tedavisi: Seçeneklerimiz neler?

Şafak Yılmaz Baran
Seda Yüksel Şimşek
Esra Bulgan Kılıçdağ
Erhan Şimşek
Didem Alkaş Yağınç
Tayfun Çok
Pages
85–91
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the success and complications of medical and surgical modalities used in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancies. Materials and Methods: Medical and surgical approaches that have been used to treat cesarean scar pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively, Local, systemic, and combined methotrexate treatments were grouped as the medical approach, and dilatation and evacuation, hysteroscopic resection, laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches were grouped as the surgical approach. Fifty-three patients were diagnosed as having cesarean scar pregnancy during the study period, 48 of whom were included in the final analysis. Eighteen patients were treated with medical interventions and 30 patients were treated surgically. Results: The success rate of surgical modalities was 96.6% and the medical treatment success was 33% (p

Özet

Amaç: Sezaryen skar gebeliklerin tedavisinde yararlanılan medikal ve cerrahi yöntemlerin etkinlik ve komplikasyonlarının incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Sezaryen skar gebelik tanısı alan toplam 53 hastanın verisi retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Lokal, sistemik ve combine metotreksat medikal yaklaşım olarak sınıflandırılırken; dilatasyon evakuasyon, histereskopik rezeksiyon, laparoskopik ve laparotomik rezeksiyon cerrahi yaklaşım olarak sınıflandırılmıştır. Elli üç hastanın 48’inin verisi final analizde yer almıştır. On sekiz hasta medikal, otuz hasta ise cerrahi yaklaşım grubunda bulunmaktadır. Bulgular: Cerrahi yaklaşım ile tedavi edilen hastalarda tedavi başarısı %96,6 iken; medikal yöntemlerin kullanıldığı hastalarda tedavi başarısı %33 olarak bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Baran, Ş. Y., Şimşek, S. Y., Kılıçdağ, E. B., Şimşek, E., Yağınç, D. A., Çok, T. (2022). Outcomes of cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: Do we have options?. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 85–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/612919

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteaguda A, Tsymbal T, Tsymbal T, Pineda G, Arslan AA. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:44.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.018
  2. Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57:537-43
  3. Marchiolé P, Garlore F, de Caro G, Podestà M, Valenzano M. Intramural pregnancy embedded in a previous Cesarean section scar treated conservatively. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:307-9
  4. Seow KM, Huang L-W, Lin Y-H, Yan-Sheng Lin M, Tsai Y-L, Hwang J-L. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management’ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:247-53
  5. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;21:220-7
  6. Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:731-8
  7. Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:592-3
  8. Shi M, Zhang H, Qi S-S, Liu W-H, Liu M, Zhao X-B, et al. Identifying risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study of 79 cases. Ginekol Pol 2018;89:195-9
  9. Parker VL, Srinivas M. Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;294:19-27
  10. Cok T, Kalayci H, Ozdemir H, Haydardedeoglu B, Parlakgumus AH, Tarim E. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided local methotrexate administration as the first-line treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy: Follow-up of 18 cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015;41:803-8
  11. Naeh A, Shrim A, Shdam-Paz E, Amir M, Hallak M, Bruchim I. Cesarean scar pregnancy managed with local and systemic methotrexate: a single center case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;238:138-42
  12. Jachymski T, Moczulska H, Guzowski G, Pomorski M, Piątek S, Zimmer M, et al. Conservative treatment of abnormally located intrauterine pregnancies (cervical and cesarean scar pregnancies): a multicenter analysis (Polish series). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020;33:993-8
  13. Jabeen K, Karuppaswamy J. Non-surgical management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy–a five-year experience. J Obstet Gynaecol 2018;38:1121-7
  14. Grechukhina O, Deshmukh U, Fan L, Kohari K, Abdel-Razeq S, Bahtiyar MO, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy, incidence, and recurrence: five-year experience at a single tertiary care referral center. Obstet Gynecol 2018;1