Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

Repeated dose of prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert when the first dose fails

İlk doz başarısız olduğunda prostaglandin E2 vajinal insertin tekrar kullanımı

Pages
50–55
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The need for the neonatal intensive care unit was found in 44 pregnantwomen (4.4%) in group 1 and 6 pregnant women (13.6%) in group 2 (p=0.006).Conclusion: When obstetric and neonatal data were evaluated in our study, we observed that dinoprostone administration was associated with increasedcesarean rates and adverse neonatal outcomes with repeated-dose dinoprostone when the first dose failed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To compare the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of patients treated with repeated-dose prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) vaginal insert whenthe first dose fails.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1.043 pregnant women who received dinoprostone for labor induction between November2012 and August 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pregnant women were divided into two groups according to the number of dinoprostone administrations: group 1, single-dosedinoprostone (n=1.000), and group 2, repeated-dose dinoprostone (n=43).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The need for the neonatal intensive care unit was found in 44 pregnantwomen (4.4%) in group 1 and 6 pregnant women (13.6%) in group 2 (p=0.006).Conclusion: When obstetric and neonatal data were evaluated in our study, we observed that dinoprostone administration was associated with increasedcesarean rates and adverse neonatal outcomes with repeated-dose dinoprostone when the first dose failed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To compare the obstetric and neonatal outcomes of patients treated with repeated-dose prostaglandin E2 (dinoprostone) vaginal insert whenthe first dose fails.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 1.043 pregnant women who received dinoprostone for labor induction between November2012 and August 2015. Pregnant women were divided into two groups according to the number of dinoprostone administrations: group 1, single-dosedinoprostone (n=1.000), and group 2, repeated-dose dinoprostone (n=43). Intrapartum, postpartum, and neonatal outcomes of the pregnant women werecompared.Results: Vaginal delivery rate was 65% in group 1 and 30.2% in group 2 (p=0.001). The need for the neonatal intensive care unit was found in 44 pregnantwomen (4.4%) in group 1 and 6 pregnant women (13.6%) in group 2 (p=0.006).Conclusion: When obstetric and neonatal data were evaluated in our study, we observed that dinoprostone administration was associated with increasedcesarean rates and adverse neonatal outcomes with repeated-dose dinoprostone when the first dose failed.

Özet

Amaç: İlk doz başarısız olduğunda tekrarlayan dozda prostaglandin E2 (dinoproston) vajinal ovül ile tedavi edilen gebelerin obstetrik ve neonatal sonuçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmaya, Kasım 2012 ile Ağustos 2015 arasında doğum indüksiyonu için dinoproston alan 1,043 gebe dahil edildi. Gebeler dinoproston uygulama sayısına göre; grup 1: tek doz dinoproston, grup 2: tekrarlanan doz dinoproston olmak üzere 2 gruba ayrıldı. Tek doz dinoproston (n=1,000) ve iki dinoproston (n=43) alan gebelerin intrapartum, postpartum ve neonatal sonuçları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Grup 1’de vajinal doğum oranı %65 iken, grup %30,2 idi (p=0,001). Yenidoğan yoğun bakım ihtiyacı grup 1’de 44 gebede (%4,4), grup 2’de 6 gebede (%13,6) görüldü (p=0,006). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda obstetrik ve neonatal veriler değerlendirildiğinde, ilk doz başarısız olduğunda tekrarlayan dinoproston dozu uygulanmasının artmış sezaryen oranları ve olumsuz neonatal sonuçlar ile ilişkili olduğunu gözlemledik.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALVAÇ, E. S., TOHMA, Y. A., ESİN, S., KARADAĞ, B., KARADAĞ, C., BAŞAR, T. (2022). Repeated dose of prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert when the first dose fails. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 50–55. https://ajindex.com/articles/612895

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aghideh FK, Mullin PM, Ingles S, Ouzounian JG, Opper N, Wilson ML, et al. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:592-6
  2. Rab MT, Mohammed AB, Zahran KA, Hassan MM, Eldeen AR, Ebrahim EM, et al. Transcervical Foley’s catheter versus Cook balloon for cervical ripening in stillbirth with a scarred uterus: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:1181-5
  3. Theobald PW, Rath W, Kühnle H, Kuhn W. Histological and electron-microscopic examinations of collagenous connective tissue of the non-pregnant cervix, the pregnant cervix, and the pregnant prostaglandin-treated cervix. Arch Gynecol 1982;231:241-5
  4. Keirse MJ. Natural prostaglandins for induction of labor and preinduction cervical ripening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:609-26
  5. Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, Kelly AJ. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:003101
  6. Chyu JK, Strassner HT. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:606-11
  7. Antonazzo P, Laoreti A, Personeni C, Grossi E, Martinelli A, Cetin I. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study. Reprod Sci 2016;23:779-84
  8. Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:661-6
  9. Petrovic Barbitch M, Gnisci A, Marcelli M, Capelle M, Guidicelli B, Cravello L, et al. Maturation cervicale à terme par utilisation répétée du dispositif intravaginal de dinoprostone [Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2013;41:346-50
  10. Mohr-Sasson A, Schiff E, Sindel O, Suday RR, Kalter-Farber A, Mashiach R, et al. Second dose of PGE2 vaginal insert versus Foley transcervical balloon for induction of labor after failure of cervical ripening with PGE2 vaginal insert. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:2074-7
  11. Sinkey RG, Lacevic J, Reljic T, Hozo I, Gibson KS, Odibo AO, et al. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: The impact on maternal and neonatal risk. PLoS One 2018;13:0193169