Journals / Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology / 2021 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of tramadol during office hysteroscopy

Ofis histeroskopi sırasında tramadolün güvenlik ve etkinliğinin sistematik derlemesi

Pages
151–158
Publication Date
2022-11-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We found that tramadol led to significantly less pain during the actual procedure [MD=-1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-1.66, -0.88); p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Office hysteroscopy (OH) is a common procedure in gynecology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We included randomized controlled trials and included all published trials in all six searched databases from their inception until February 28th 2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We found that tramadol led to significantly less pain during the actual procedure [MD=-1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-1.66, -0.88); p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Office hysteroscopy (OH) is a common procedure in gynecology. Pain is the most frequently reported problem in OH. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of tramadol administration in relieving pain in women undergoing OH. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials based on our search terms. We included randomized controlled trials and included all published trials in all six searched databases from their inception until February 28th 2021. We included pain as the primary outcome, and the incidence of adverse events of tramadol as secondary outcomes. We performed the analysis of continuous data using mean difference (MD) and dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR). We found that tramadol led to significantly less pain during the actual procedure [MD=-1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): (-1.66, -0.88); p

Özet

Ofis histeroskopi (OH) jinekolojide yaygın bir prosedürdür. OH için en sık bildirilen komplikasyon ağrıdır. Bu çalışmada, OH uygulanan kadınlarda ağrının giderilmesinde tramadol uygulamasının rolünü araştırmayı amaçladık. Arama terimlerimize dayalı olarak ilgili klinik çalışmalar için PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, MEDLINE, Scopus ve Web of Science veritabanlarında tarama yaptık. Derlemeye randomize kontrollü çalışmaları dahil ettik. Tarama yaptığımız 6 veri tabanındaki yayınlanmış tüm çalışmalar, başlangıçlarından 28 Şubat 2021’e kadar dahil edildi. Ağrıyı birincil sonlanım ve tramadolün advers olaylarının insidansını ikincil sonlanım olarak kabul ettik. Sürekli verilerin analizini ortalama farkı (MD) kullanarak; ikili verilerin analizini risk oranını (RO) kullanarak gerçekleştirdik. Tramadolün gerçek prosedür sırasında önemli ölçüde daha az ağrıya neden olduğunu bulduk [MD=- 1,27 %95 güven aralığı (GA)=(-1,66, -0,88) p

🔖

Cite This Article

Marchand, G. J., Ruther, S., Brazil, G., Sainz, K., Ware, K., King, A., Maarouf, H., Masoud, A., Ulibarri, H., Parise, J., Arroyo, A. (2022). Systematic review of the safety and efficacy of tramadol during office hysteroscopy. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 151–158. https://ajindex.com/articles/612885

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gimpelson RJ, Whalen TR. Hysteroscopy as gold standard for evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1637
  2. Nagele F, Lockwoodb G, Magos AL. Randomised placebo controlled trial of mefenamic acid for pr:emedication at outpatient hysteroscopy: a pilot study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:842-4
  3. Raju KS. Should outpatient hysteroscopy replace conventional diagnostic dilatation and curettage in gynecologic practice? J Gynecol Surg 1992;8:225-30
  4. Valle RF. Office hysteroscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999;42:276- 89
  5. Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Matsuoka S, Tokita S, et al. A new instrument: a flexible hysteroscope with narrow band imaging system - Optical quality comparison between a flexible and a rigid hysteroscope. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011;20:263-6
  6. Unfried G, Wieser F, Albrecht A, Kaider A, Nagele, F. Flexible versus rigid endoscopes for outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2001;16:168-71
  7. Kayatas S, Meseci E, Tosun OA, Arinkan SA, Uygur L, Api M. Experience of hysteroscopy indications and complications in 5, 474 cases. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2014;41:451-4
  8. Taylor PJ, Hamou JE. Hysteroscopy. J Reprod Med Obstet Gynecol 1983;28:359-89
  9. Topsoee MF, Ibfelt EH, Settnes A. The Danish hysterectomy and hysteroscopy database. Clin Epidemiol 2016;8:515-20
  10. Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Santangelo F, Zizolfi B, Tanos V, Perino A, et al. The role of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of adenomyosis. BioMed Res Int 2017:1-7
  11. De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M, Del Vecchio C, Bovicelli L. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000;7:71-5
  12. Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L, Mestdagh G, Lauwers M, Braekmans P, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 2005;20:258-63
  13. De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I. Office hysteroscopy and compliance: Mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2441-5 14. Cooper AM, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Local anaesthesia for pain control during outpatient hysteroscopy: Systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ 2010;340:c1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1130
  14. Wong AYK, Wong KS, Tang LCH. Stepwise pain score analysis of the effect of local lignocaine on outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-c