Journals / Turkish journal of nephrology (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

COVID-19 Infection in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Comparative Outcome Study with Patients on Hemodialysis and Patients without Kidney Disease

Pages
33–42
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There is a need for careful surveillance of PD patients for infection signs and prompt treatment of COVID-19.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: There is limited data about coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) characteristics and results in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We included 18 PD patients and consecutive age- and gender-matched 18 HD and 18 patients without kidney disease (control group) registered into the Turkish Society of Nephrology database including 1301 COVID-19 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There is a need for careful surveillance of PD patients for infection signs and prompt treatment of COVID-19.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: There is limited data about coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) characteristics and results in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes among PD patients and compare them with matched hemodialysis (HD) patients and a control group without kidney disease. Methods: We included 18 PD patients and consecutive age- and gender-matched 18 HD and 18 patients without kidney disease (control group) registered into the Turkish Society of Nephrology database including 1301 COVID-19 patients. We compared demographic, clinical, radiological, laboratory data, and outcomes namely intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, mortality, and composite outcome (death and/or ICU admission). Results: ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality rates in PD patients (27.8%, 22.2%, and 22.2%, respectively) and the HD group (16.7%, 11.1%, and 16.7%, respectively) were higher than the control group (11.1%, 11.1%, and 5.6%, respectively), but intergroup comparison did not reveal difference. A total of 11 (20.3%) patients had composite outcome (6 PD patients, 3 HD patients, and 2 patients in the control group). In Cox regression analysis, higher age and higher CRP level were related to increased risk of composite outcome. Adjusted rate of composite outcome in PD group was significantly higher than the control group (P = .050). This rate was similar in HD and control groups (P = .30). Conclusions: Combined in-hospital mortality and/or ICU admission of PD patients with COVID-19 was significantly higher than the control patients. There is a need for careful surveillance of PD patients for infection signs and prompt treatment of COVID-19.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEZER, S., BEK, S. G., YAZICI, H., ŞENGÜL, E., GÜRSU, M., KAZANCIOĞLU, R., TURGUTALP, K., ÖZTÜRK, S., AYLI, M. D., TOKGÖZ, B., AHBAP, E., ONAN, E., YILDIZ, A., ATEŞ, K., GENEK, D. G., ODABAŞ, A. R., ARICI, M., AŞICIOĞLU, E., ÖĞÜTM, M. B. (2022). COVID-19 Infection in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Comparative Outcome Study with Patients on Hemodialysis and Patients without Kidney Disease. Turkish journal of nephrology (Online), Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 33–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/612803

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020
  2. 97(5):829-838. [CrossRef] 2. Naicker S, Yang CW, Hwang SJ, et al. The novel coronavirus 2019 epidemic and kidneys. Kidney Int. 2020
  3. 97(5):824-828. [CrossRef] 3. Anders HJ, Bruchfeld A, Fernandez Juarez GM, et al. Recommendations for the management of patients with immune-mediated kidney disease during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020
  4. 35(6):920- 925. [CrossRef] 4. Valeri AM, Robbins-Juarez SY, Stevens JS, et al. Presentation and outcomes of patients with ESKD and COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020
  5. 31(7):1409-1415. [CrossRef] 5. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020
  6. 323(16):1612-1614. [CrossRef] 6. Meijers B, Messa P, Ronco C. Safeguarding the maintenance hemodialysis patient population during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Blood Purif. 2020
  7. 49(3):259-264. [CrossRef] 7. En Khoo BZ, See YP, Kam Koh TJ, Yeo SC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and dialysis: the experience in Singapore. Kidney Med. 2020
  8. 2(4):381-384. [CrossRef] 8. El Shamy O, Tran H, Sharma S, et al. Telenephrology with remote peritoneal dialysis monitoring during coronavirus disease 2019. Am J Nephrol. 2020
  9. 51(6):480-482. [CrossRef] 9. Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, Garg AX. Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012
  10. 23(3):533-544. [CrossRef] 10. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Guidance to COVID-19 (SARS Cov2 Infection) (Scientific Board Study). 2020. Turkey: Directorate General of Public Health. (Accessed April 18, 2020). https:// covid19.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/40719/0/covid-19rehberieriskinhastayonetimivetedavipdf.pdf. 11. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020
  11. 323(18):1843-1844. [CrossRef] 12. Jiang HJ, Tang H, Xiong F, et al. COVID-19 in peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020
  12. 16(1):121-123. [CrossRef] 13. Kato S, Chmielewski M, Honda H, et al. Aspects of immune dysfunction in end-stage renal disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008
  13. 3(5):1526-1533. [CrossRef] 14. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020
  14. 55(5). [CrossRef] 15. Xiong F, Tang H, Liu L, et al. Clinical characteristics of a