Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2000 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

The role of protein synthesis in the adhesion of Chinese hamster lung cells

Pages
15–22
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that cells not require protein synthesis only for initial cell attachment, but also to gain the maximum possible adhesion strength.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to determine the effect of endogenous protein synthesis on CHL cell adhesion, the initial attachment of these cells to tissue culture dishes was measur ed in the presence of 1µgml -1 emetine, in which protein synthesis was inhibited by 97% as determined by labeling the cells with [ 3 5 S]-methio-nine.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the pr esence of this drug, 80% of cells were able to adhere after 2 hours of incubation at 37 o C, while, during the same period, 97% of the contr ol cells became attached.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that cells not require protein synthesis only for initial cell attachment, but also to gain the maximum possible adhesion strength.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In order to determine the effect of endogenous protein synthesis on CHL cell adhesion, the initial attachment of these cells to tissue culture dishes was measur ed in the presence of 1µgml -1 emetine, in which protein synthesis was inhibited by 97% as determined by labeling the cells with [ 3 5 S]-methio-nine. In the pr esence of this drug, 80% of cells were able to adhere after 2 hours of incubation at 37 o C, while, during the same period, 97% of the contr ol cells became attached. Cells str engthen their adhesion followinginitial attachment, spreading and growth. Hence, the adhesion str engths of CHL cells that wer e gr own for 24 hours in the presence of cycloheximide, or emetine, or both were measured quantitatively using a convering laminar flow chamber . The inhibition of protein synthesis by the above drug(s) reduced cell adhesion str ength. Hence, the levels of critical shear str ess of detachment of the cells were 8.1 8 ±1.0 3 N m -2 , 6.7 0 ±0.3 0 N m-2 , and 5.6 6 ±.0.3 6 N m-2, respectively , while that of the control cells was 10.48±0.78Nm -2 . Before subculturing CHL cells in the presence of these drug(s), pre-treatment of the cells with the same protein synthesis inhibitor further reduced the cell adhesion strength. Thus, with a pre treatment of cycloheximide, emetine and both emetine and cycloheximide the levels of critical shear stress of the detachment of cells were 4.84±0.54Nm -2 , 4.20±0.2Nm -2, and 3.4±0.7Nm -2, respectively . These results indicate that cells not require protein synthesis only for initial cell attachment, but also to gain the maximum possible adhesion strength.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, A. (2022). The role of protein synthesis in the adhesion of Chinese hamster lung cells. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 15–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/612450

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Laterra J, Norton JK, Izzard CS, Culp CA. Contact formation by fibroblasts adhering to sulfate-binding substrate. Exp Cell Res 146: 15-27, 1983
  2. Woods A, Couchman JR. Protein kinase involvement in focal adhesion formation. J Cell Sci 101: 277-290, 1992
  3. Woods A, Couchman JR. Focal adhesions and cell matrix interactions. Collagen Rel Res 8: 155-182, 1988
  4. Singer II, Scott S, Kawka DW, Kazasis DM, Gailit J. Cell surface distribution of fibronectin and vitronectin receptors depend on substrate composition and extracellular matrix accumulation. J Cell Biol 106: 2171-2182, 1988
  5. Stickel SK, Wang Yu-Li J. Synthetic peptide RGDS induces dissociation of a-actinin and vinculin from the sites of focal contacts. J Cell Biol 107: 1231- 1239, 1988
  6. Soderquist ME, Walton AG. Structural changes in proteins adsorbed on polymer surfaces. J Colloid and Interface Sci 75: 386-397, 1980. 7. van Wachem PB, Vreriks CM, Beugeling T, Feijen J, Bantjes A, Detmers JP, van Aken WG. The influence of protein adsorption on interactons of cultured human endothelial cells with polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 21: 701-718, 1987
  7. Absolom DR, Thomson C, Hawtorn ZW, Neuman AW. Kinetics of cell adhesion to polymer surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 22: 215-229, 1988
  8. Revel JP, Hoch D, Wolken K. Adhesion of culture cells to their substratum. Exp Cell Res 84: 207-218, 1973
  9. Horbett TA, waldburger JJ, Ratner BD, Hoffman AS. Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J Biomed Mater Res 15: 403-423, 1988
  10. Bidanset DJ. Regulation of cell substrate adhesion. J Cell Biol 118: 1523-1531, 1992
  11. Lee JM, Parle JW, Lee HB. Cell adhesion and growth on polymer surfaces with hydroxyl groups prepared by water vapor plasma treatment. Biomaterials 12: 443-448, 1991
  12. Schakenraad JM, Busscher HJ, Wildevuur CRS, Arends J. The influence of substratum free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. J Biomed Mater Res 20: 773-784, 1987
  13. Lydon MJ, Foulger CA (1988) Cell substratum interactions: Serum spreading factor. Biomater 9: 525- 527 15. Anderson JM, Bonfield TL, Ziats NP. Protein adsorption and cellular adhesion and activation on biomedical polymers. Int J Artific Org 13: 375- 382, 1990
  14. Couchman JR., Höök M, Rees DA, Timpl R. Adhesion, growth, and matrix production by fibroblasts on laminin substrates. J. Cell Biol. 96: 177-183, 1983
  15. McDonald JA. Extracel