Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2009 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

Endoscopic polypectomy: outcomes of 467 cases in 20 years

Pages
747–753
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Endoscopic polypectomy has an important place in the treatment of polyps—the preliminary lesions of colorectal cancers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of endoscopic polypectomy in 467 patients for 692 polyps over the course of 20 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Key words: Endoscopy · polypectomy · Key words: Endoscopy

Abstract

Aim: Endoscopic polypectomy has an important place in the treatment of polyps&#8212;the preliminary lesions of colorectal cancers. This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of endoscopic polypectomy in 467 patients for 692 polyps over the course of 20 years. Materials and methods: The records of 692 endoscopic polypectomies performed in 467 patients between July 1988 and July 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Patient age ranged from 3 to 85 years (mean: 50.6 years), and 302 of the 467 (64.7%) patients were male. Polypectomy was performed for 692 polyps (mean: 1.5; range: 1-12). The most common polyp location was the rectum (41.5%), polyp diameter ranged between 1 and 40 mm (mean: 6.1 mm), and 451 of the polyps (65.2%) were pedunculated. In 2 (0.4%) patients, major complications developed, but there was no mortality. Histopathologically, 43.8% of the polyps were hyperplastic, 22.8% were adenomatous, 17.1% were mixed, 9.4% were hamartomas, 6.2% were serrated adenomas, and 0.7% were inflammatory polyps. The risk of malignant degeneration was significantly higher in patients with multiple polyps (P < 0.01), right colon polyps (P < 0.01), polyps larger than 10 mm (P < 0.01), sessile polyps (P < 0.01), and adenomatous polyps, mixed polyps, and serrated adenomas (P < 0.05). Of the 26 (5.6%) patients with malignant polyps, 6 in whom in situ and early carcinomas were detected were treated with polypectomy and followed-up with regular examinations. Another 20 patients with invasive carcinomas or familial polyposis were treated with surgery. Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.

Özet

Aim: Endoscopic polypectomy has an important place in the treatment of polyps&#8212;the preliminary lesions of colorectal cancers. This study aimed to discuss the outcomes of endoscopic polypectomy in 467 patients for 692 polyps over the course of 20 years. Materials and methods: The records of 692 endoscopic polypectomies performed in 467 patients between July 1988 and July 2008 were retrospectively evaluated. Results: Patient age ranged from 3 to 85 years (mean: 50.6 years), and 302 of the 467 (64.7%) patients were male. Polypectomy was performed for 692 polyps (mean: 1.5; range: 1-12). The most common polyp location was the rectum (41.5%), polyp diameter ranged between 1 and 40 mm (mean: 6.1 mm), and 451 of the polyps (65.2%) were pedunculated. In 2 (0.4%) patients, major complications developed, but there was no mortality. Histopathologically, 43.8% of the polyps were hyperplastic, 22.8% were adenomatous, 17.1% were mixed, 9.4% were hamartomas, 6.2% were serrated adenomas, and 0.7% were inflammatory polyps. The risk of malignant degeneration was significantly higher in patients with multiple polyps (P < 0.01), right colon polyps (P < 0.01), polyps larger than 10 mm (P < 0.01), sessile polyps (P < 0.01), and adenomatous polyps, mixed polyps, and serrated adenomas (P < 0.05). Of the 26 (5.6%) patients with malignant polyps, 6 in whom in situ and early carcinomas were detected were treated with polypectomy and followed-up with regular examinations. Another 20 patients with invasive carcinomas or familial polyposis were treated with surgery. Conclusion: Flexible endoscopic polypectomy is a simple and reliable method for removing colorectal polyps, and for treating in situ and early colorectal polypoid cancers.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, F., YILDIRGAN, M. İ., BAŞOĞLU, M., ATAMANALP, S. S., KANTARCI, M., ÖZTÜRK, G., GÜRSAN, N. (2022). Endoscopic polypectomy: outcomes of 467 cases in 20 years. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 747–753. https://ajindex.com/articles/611651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Altıparmak E, Orhan S, Erkan P, Engin A. Colorectal polyps: The Yüksek Ihtisas experience. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 49-52.
  2. Colucci PM, Yale SH, Rall CJ. Colorectal polyps. Clin Med Res 2003; 1: 261-2.
  3. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Stürmer T, Hoffmeister M. Case-control study supports extension of surveillance internal after colonoscopic polypectomy to at least 5 yr. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1739-44. Rex DK. Colonoscopy and colorectal cancer prevention. ACG; 2007; 1-6.
  4. Corman ML, Brown B, McMullan E. Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. In: Corman ML, editor. Colon and rectal surgery. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005. p. 91-127.
  5. Consolo P, Luigiano C, Strangio G, Scaffidi MG, Giacobbe G, Di Giuseppe G et al. Efficacy risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: Ten year experience at a single center. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2364-9.
  6. Nivatvongs S, Forde KA. Diagnostic evaluations-endoscopy: rigid, flexible complications. In: Wolff BG, Fleshmann JW, Beck DE, Beck DE, Pemberton JH, Wexner SD, editors. The ASCRS Textbook of Colon and Rectal Surgery. New York: Springer, 2007. p. 57-68.
  7. Araujo SE, Alves PR, Habr-Gama A. Role of colonoscopy in colorectal cancer. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 2001; 56: 25-35.
  8. Muto T, Sawada T, Sugihara K. Treatment of carcinoma in adenomas. World J Surg 1991; 15: 35-40.
  9. Su MY, Ho YP, Hsu CM, Chiu CT, Chen PC, Lien JM et al. How can colorectal neoplasms be treated during colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 2806-10. Fry R. Management of the malignant polyp. In: Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP, editors. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2005. p. 327-9. Terzi C. Kolorektal poliplerde kansere yaklaşım. T Klin J Surgery 2004; 9: 65-70. Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 3053-61. Nivatvongs S. Treatment of colorectal adenomas: screening, follow-up and surveillance. In: Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP, editors. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2005. p. 331-42.
  10. Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Kawabe T et al. Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut 2004; 53: 568-72.
  11. Yamaji Y, Mitsuhama T, Yoshida H, Watabe H, Okamoto M, Wada R et al. The malignant potential of freshly developed colorectal po