SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Comparison between intravenous and thoracic epidural analgesia in single coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Ali Cem YORGANCIOĞLU
Serdar GÜNAYDIN
Nevriye SALMAN
Halil İbrahim UÇAR
Fatih Tanzer SERTER
Pages
581–589
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: After single coronary artery surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective than intravenous analgesia; it also enabled earlier tracheal extubation and a shorter hospitalization period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare thoracic epidural analgesia with intravenous analgesia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 40 patients who had received elective single artery bypass surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: After single coronary artery surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective than intravenous analgesia; it also enabled earlier tracheal extubation and a shorter hospitalization period.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Coronary artery bypass grafting · analgesia · epidural

Abstract

Aim: To compare thoracic epidural analgesia with intravenous analgesia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 40 patients who had received elective single artery bypass surgery. After general anesthesia, one group was given patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia and the other group was given patient-controlled intravenous meperidine analgesia. Patient assessments were performed during the postoperative period and included the duration of hospital stay, pain and sedation scores, ambulation score, atrial fibrillation incidence, and organ morbidities. Results: No differences were detected between the groups in the demographic or intraoperative data. However, a statistically significant difference was detected in favor of thoracic epidural analgesia for the duration of extubation and hospital stay, pain control, sedation grade, mobilization, and quality of recovery scores. Conclusion: After single coronary artery surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective than intravenous analgesia; it also enabled earlier tracheal extubation and a shorter hospitalization period.

Özet

Aim: To compare thoracic epidural analgesia with intravenous analgesia in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 40 patients who had received elective single artery bypass surgery. After general anesthesia, one group was given patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia and the other group was given patient-controlled intravenous meperidine analgesia. Patient assessments were performed during the postoperative period and included the duration of hospital stay, pain and sedation scores, ambulation score, atrial fibrillation incidence, and organ morbidities. Results: No differences were detected between the groups in the demographic or intraoperative data. However, a statistically significant difference was detected in favor of thoracic epidural analgesia for the duration of extubation and hospital stay, pain control, sedation grade, mobilization, and quality of recovery scores. Conclusion: After single coronary artery surgery, thoracic epidural analgesia was more effective than intravenous analgesia; it also enabled earlier tracheal extubation and a shorter hospitalization period.

🔖

Cite This Article

YORGANCIOĞLU, A. C., GÜNAYDIN, S., SALMAN, N., UÇAR, H. İ., SERTER, F. T. (2022). Comparison between intravenous and thoracic epidural analgesia in single coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 581–589. https://ajindex.com/articles/611212

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Liem TH, Hasenbos MA, Booij LH, Gielen MJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting using two different anesthetic techniques: II. Postoperative outcome. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 156-61.
  2. Loick HM, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Junker R, Erren M, Berendes E et al. High thoracic epidural anesthesia, but not clonidine, attenuates the perioperative stress response via sympatholysis and reduces the release of troponin T in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 701-9.
  3. Scott NB, Turfrey DJ, Ray DA, Nzewi O, Sutcliffe NP, Lal AB et al. A prospective randomized study of the potential benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 528-35.
  4. Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P. Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 853-8.
  5. Kock M, Blomberg S, Emanuelsson H, Lomsky M, Stromblad SO, Ricksten SE. Thoracic epidural anesthesia improves global and regional left ventricular function during stress-induced myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 625-30.
  6. Royse C, Royse A, Soeding P, Blake D, Pang J. Prospective randomized trial of high thoracic epidural analgesia for coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 93- 100. 7. Priestley MC, Cope L, Halliwell R, Gibson P, Chard RB, Skinner M et al. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for cardiac surgery: the effects on tracheal intubation time and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 275-82.
  7. Liu SS, Block BM, Wu CL. Effects of preoperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2004; 101: 153-61. 9. Hansdottir V, Philip J, Olsen MF, Eduard C, Houltz E, Ricksten SE. Thoracic epidural versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 142- 51. Castellano JM, Durbin CG Jr. Epidural analgesia and cardiac surgery: worth the risk? Chest 2000; 117: 305-7. O’Connor CJ, Tuman KJ. Epidural anesthesia and analgesia for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: still a forbidden territory? Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 523-5.
  8. Myles PS, Hunt JO, Fletcher H, Solly R, Woodward D, Kelly S. Relation between quality of recovery in hospital and quality of life at 3 months after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 862-7.
  9. Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, Borger MA, Doll N, Falk V et al. Impact of off-pump c