Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Üremik olan ve olmayan hastalarda ropivakain ile çoklu enjeksiyon yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan aksiller bloğun yayılımı

The effects of axillary block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients

Pages
457–464
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Axillary brachial plexus block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients provided a similarly good quality of the block and lack of systemic toxicity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the sensory and motor block quality in axillary brachial plexus block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Examined were 60 patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the distal upper extremity (nonuremic group: group N, n = 30) or creation of an arteriovenous fi stula (uremic group: group U, n = 30) with an axillary brachial plexus block.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Axillary brachial plexus block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients provided a similarly good quality of the block and lack of systemic toxicity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To compare the sensory and motor block quality in axillary brachial plexus block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients. Materials and methods: Examined were 60 patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery of the distal upper extremity (nonuremic group: group N, n = 30) or creation of an arteriovenous fi stula (uremic group: group U, n = 30) with an axillary brachial plexus block. The median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves were selectively localized by nerve stimulation. After obtaining an appropriate peripheral motor response, predetermined volumes of ropivacaine (0.5%), in accordance with a formula, were selectively injected to the 4 nerves by multiple injections in both groups. Sensory and motor block were assessed. Results: At 30 min, complete sensory and motor block was observed at a rate of 95% in the ulnar nerve innervation area and 100% in the other 3 nerves in group U, whereas these rates were 95% in the musculocutaneous nerve innervation area and 100% in the other 3 nerves in group N. There was no statistically signifi cant difference between the groups. Conclusion: Axillary brachial plexus block using the multiple injection method with ropivacaine in uremic and nonuremic patients provided a similarly good quality of the block and lack of systemic toxicity.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda, üremik olan ve olmayan hastalarda, ropivakain ile çoklu enjeksiyon yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan aksiller blokta oluşan duyusal ve motor bloğun kalitesini karşılaştırdık. Yöntem ve gereç: Ortopedik distal üst ekstremite cerrahisi (üremik olmayan grup; grup ÜO, n = 30) ya da arteriovenöz fi stül açılması (üremik grup; grup Ü, n = 30) planlanmış 60 hastada aksiler brachial plexus bloğu uygulanarak çalışma yapıldı. Median, radial, ulnar, ve muskulokutanöz sinirler sinir stimülatörü ile selektif olarak stimüle edildi. Her iki grupta da benzer şekilde, uygun periferik motor yanıt alındıktan sonra çoklu enjeksiyon yöntemi ile dört sinire selektif olarak, formüle göre önceden belirlenmiş volümde ropivakain (% 0,5) enjeksiyonu yapıldı. Duyusal ve motor blok değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Otuzuncu dakikadaki tam duyusal ve motor blok, grup Üde, ulnar sinir innervasyon alanında % 95, diğer üç sinirde % 100; grup ÜOda ise muskulokutanöz sinir innervasyon alanında % 95, diğer üç sinirde % 100 oranlarında gözlenmiştir. Gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak belirgin bir fark yoktur. Sonuç: Ropivakain ile çoklu enjeksiyon yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan aksiller blokta, üremik olan ve olmayan hastalarda benzer şekilde iyi kalitede ve sistemik toksisite olmaksızın blok sağlanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇEVİK, H., MAHLİ, A., COŞKUN, D. (2022). Üremik olan ve olmayan hastalarda ropivakain ile çoklu enjeksiyon yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan aksiller bloğun yayılımı. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 457–464. https://ajindex.com/articles/611182

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Crews JC, Weller RS, Moss J, James RL. Levobupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: a pharmacokinetic and clinical comparison in patients with normal function or renal disease. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 219-23
  2. Alsati RA, el-Dawlatly AA, al-Salman M, Jommaa S, Amro K, Dweiri MA et al. Arteriovenous fi stula in chronic renal failure patients: comparison between three diff erent anesthetic techniques. Middle East J Anesthesiol 1999; 15: 305-14
  3. Mouquet C, Bitker MO, Bailliart O, Rottembourg J, Clergue F, Montejo LS et al. Anesthesia for creation of a forearm fi stula in patients with endstage renal failure. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 909-14
  4. Gould DB, Aldrete JA. Bupivacaine cardiotoxicity in a patient with renal failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27: 18-21
  5. Rice AS, Pither CE, Tucker GT. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine aft er supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade in patients with chronic renal failure. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 354-7
  6. Martin R, Beauregard L, Tétrault JP. Brachial plexus blockade and renal failure. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 405-6
  7. Pere P, Solonen M, Jolinen M, Rosenberg PH, Neuvonen PJ, Haasio J. Pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine in uremic patient after axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 563-9
  8. Hempel V, Baur KF. Regional Anaesthesie für Schülter. Arm und Hand. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1982. p.60-4
  9. Tran DQH, Russo G, Muñoz L, Zaouter C, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasoundguided supraclavicular, infraclavicular and axillary brachial plexus blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009; 34: 366-71
  10. Bromage PR, Gertel M. Brachial plexus anesthesia in chronic renal failure. Anesthesiology 1972; 36: 488-93
  11. Knudsen K, Beckman Suurküla M, Bloomberg S, Sjövall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 507-14
  12. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bloomfi eld P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1989; 69: 563-9
  13. Grossman SH, Davis D, Kitchell BB, Shand DG, Routledge PA. Diazepam and lidocaine plasma protein binding in renal disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1982; 31: 350-7
  14. Mostert JW, Evers JL, Hobika GH, Moore RH, Kenny GM, Murphy GP. The haemodynamic response to chronic renal failure as studied in the azotaemic state. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42: 397-411
  15. Norio K. Mäkisalo H, Isoniemi H, Groop PH, Per