Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

What is the best cut-off point for screening gestational diabetes in Turkish women?

Pages
523–531
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: GCT is suitable for screening of Turkish women, but place of residence as well as race must be taken into consideration to establish the best cut-off level of GCT, since ethnic and environmental factors may contribute to the occurrence of GDM.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To find an optimal threshold level with higher sensitivity and specificity for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Turkish pregnant women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Screening for GDM was performed in all pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation using the 1 h 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) with a subsequent 3 h 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for confirmation if screened positive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: GCT is suitable for screening of Turkish women, but place of residence as well as race must be taken into consideration to establish the best cut-off level of GCT, since ethnic and environmental factors may contribute to the occurrence of GDM.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: · Key words:

Abstract

To find an optimal threshold level with higher sensitivity and specificity for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Turkish pregnant women. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study. Screening for GDM was performed in all pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation using the 1 h 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) with a subsequent 3 h 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for confirmation if screened positive. The glucose values obtained were analyzed by both the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C criteria) and National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria. Results: There were 808 women meeting the study inclusion criteria. There were 66 (8.1%) women diagnosed with GDM using the C&C criteria and 45 (5.7%) using the NDDG criteria. The best cut-off point for GCT was 132 mg/dL for detecting GDM. No diabetes was found below the glucose level of 130 mg/dL. Conclusion: GCT is suitable for screening of Turkish women, but place of residence as well as race must be taken into consideration to establish the best cut-off level of GCT, since ethnic and environmental factors may contribute to the occurrence of GDM.

Özet

To find an optimal threshold level with higher sensitivity and specificity for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Turkish pregnant women. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study. Screening for GDM was performed in all pregnant women between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation using the 1 h 50 g glucose challenge test (GCT) with a subsequent 3 h 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) for confirmation if screened positive. The glucose values obtained were analyzed by both the Carpenter and Coustan (C&C criteria) and National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria. Results: There were 808 women meeting the study inclusion criteria. There were 66 (8.1%) women diagnosed with GDM using the C&C criteria and 45 (5.7%) using the NDDG criteria. The best cut-off point for GCT was 132 mg/dL for detecting GDM. No diabetes was found below the glucose level of 130 mg/dL. Conclusion: GCT is suitable for screening of Turkish women, but place of residence as well as race must be taken into consideration to establish the best cut-off level of GCT, since ethnic and environmental factors may contribute to the occurrence of GDM.

Keywords
🔖

Cite This Article

KÖŞÜŞ, N., KÖŞÜŞ, A., TURHAN, N. (2022). What is the best cut-off point for screening gestational diabetes in Turkish women?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 523–531. https://ajindex.com/articles/611153

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Hanna FW, Peters JR. Screening for gestational diabetes: past, present and future. Diabet Med 2002; 19: 351-8. American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 27: 88-90.
  2. Rodrigues S, Robinson E, Gray-Donald K. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among James Bay Cree women in northern Quebec. CMAJ 1999; 160: 1293-7.
  3. Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the National Diabetes Data Group or the Carpenter and Coustan plasma glucose thresholds. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1625-30.
  4. Dabelea D, Snell-Bergeon JK, Hartsfi eld CL, Bischoff KJ, Hamman RF, McDuffi e RS. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 579-84. Evans MJ. Diabetes and pregnancy: a review of pathology. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2009; 9: 201-6. Lindsay RS. Gestational diabetes: causes and consequences. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2009; 9: 27-31. 8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 30. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Gestational Diabetes. Washington DC: ACOG; September 2001. American Diabetes Association. Position statement: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2006. Diabetes Care 2006; 59: 1-39.
  5. Cousins L, Baxi L, Chez R, Coustan D, Gabbe S, Harris J et al. Screening recommendations for gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 493-6.
  6. Friedman S, Khoury-Collado F, Dalloul M, Sherer DM, Abulafi a O. Glucose challenge test threshold values in screening for gestational diabetes among black women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 46-8.
  7. Miyakoshi K, Tanaka M, Ueno K, Uehara K, Ishimoto H, Yoshimura Y. Cutoff value of 1 h, 50 g glucose challenge test for screening of gestational diabetes mellitus in a Japanese population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 60: 63-7.
  8. Vitoratos N, Salamalekis E, Bettas P, Kalabokis D, Chrisikopoulos A. Which is the threshold glycose value for further investigation in pregnancy? Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 1997; 24: 171-3.
  9. Tanir HM, Sener T, Gurer H, Kaya M. A ten-year gestational diabetes mellitus cohort at a university clinic of the mid- Anatolian region of Turkey. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2005; 32: 241- 4. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 144: 768-73. National Diabetes Data Group. Classifi