Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3

Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Turkish Cypriots using CBCTimages reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo

Pages
848–861
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The results demonstrated that males had significantly larger mean values than females for all linear measurements, except for dentoalveolar parameters (P < 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of this study was to create a database of 3D cephalometric measurements of Turkish Cypriot patients using a 3D rendering software program.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The study population comprised 121 subjects who had undergone cone beam CT imaging (CBCT).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The results demonstrated that males had significantly larger mean values than females for all linear measurements, except for dentoalveolar parameters (P < 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to create a database of 3D cephalometric measurements of Turkish Cypriot patients using a 3D rendering software program. Materials and methods: The study population comprised 121 subjects who had undergone cone beam CT imaging (CBCT). Invivo 5.1 software was used to generate cephalograms from the CBCT dataset that were then linked to the 3D hard-tissue surface representations. In total, 38 angular and 28 linear widely used measurements were recorded. Results: The results demonstrated that males had significantly larger mean values than females for all linear measurements, except for dentoalveolar parameters (P < 0.05). Additionally, significant differences were found in most of the mandibular anteroposterior and vertical measurements, especially SNB, GoGn/SN, FMA, and MP/SN, between the sexes (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This is the first population-based study to focus solely on Turkish Cypriots craniofacial anatomy and orthodontic characteristics. The present findings will produce 3D cephalometric normative data for the Cypriot population and will be valuable for oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists in Cyprus, the UK, Australia, Turkey, and other European countries who treat a large number of Turkish Cypriot patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, K., AKSOY, S., ÖZ, U., VAHDETTİN, L. (2022). Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Turkish Cypriots using CBCTimages reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 3, 848–861. https://ajindex.com/articles/611062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Macri V, Athanasiou AE. Sources of error in lateral cephalometry. In: Athanasiou AE, editor. Orthodontic Cephalometry. London, UK: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995. pp. 125-140
  2. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564
  3. Cattaneo PM, Bloch CB, Calmar D, Hjortshøj M, Melsen B. Comparison between conventional and cone beam computed tomography-generated cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 798-802
  4. Kumar V, Ludlow JB, Mol A, Cevidanes L. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36: 263-269
  5. Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: Spiral multi-slice vs cone beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 410-416
  6. Kalender A, Orhan K, Aksoy U. Evaluation of the mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Turkish patients using cone-beam computed tomography images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program. Clin Anat 2012; 25: 584-592
  7. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I: On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 265-269
  8. Kumar V, Ludlow J, Soares Cevidanes LH, Mol A. In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 873-879
  9. Oz U, Orhan K, Abe N. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 492-500
  10. Longoni S, Sartori M, Braun M, Bravetti P, Lapi A, Baldoni M, Tredici G. Lingual vascular canals of the mandible: the risk of bleeding complications during implant procedures. Implant Dent 2007; 16: 131-138
  11. Cheung LK, Chan YM, Jayaratne YS. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 112: e56-73
  12. Gateno J, Xia JJ, Teichgraeber JF. New 3-dimensional cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: 606-622
  13. Bayome M, Park JH, Kook YA. New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and norma