Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3

An alternative method of oral to nasal endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery

Pages
493–495
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Herein we describe 3 patients in whom oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange was accomplished with the aid of a nasogastric tube after placement of an LMA CTrachTM, as no FOB was available.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery frequently require nasal intubation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although awake fiberoptic intubation is the procedure of choice, a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) may not be available in all clinics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Herein we describe 3 patients in whom oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange was accomplished with the aid of a nasogastric tube after placement of an LMA CTrachTM, as no FOB was available.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Maxillofacial surgery · nasal intubation · endotracheal tube exchange

Abstract

Patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery frequently require nasal intubation. Although awake fiberoptic intubation is the procedure of choice, a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) may not be available in all clinics. Furthermore, the procedure itself requires skill and experience, and cannot be used when the view is obstructed by bleeding or secretions. Herein we describe 3 patients in whom oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange was accomplished with the aid of a nasogastric tube after placement of an LMA CTrachTM, as no FOB was available.

Özet

Patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery frequently require nasal intubation. Although awake fiberoptic intubation is the procedure of choice, a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) may not be available in all clinics. Furthermore, the procedure itself requires skill and experience, and cannot be used when the view is obstructed by bleeding or secretions. Herein we describe 3 patients in whom oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange was accomplished with the aid of a nasogastric tube after placement of an LMA CTrachTM, as no FOB was available.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEDİRLİ, N., EMMEZ, G., DEMİREL, C. B., ALKAN, M., PAMPAL, H. K. (2022). An alternative method of oral to nasal endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 3, 493–495. https://ajindex.com/articles/611049

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Nofal O. Awake light-aided blind nasal intubation: prototype device. Br J Anaest 2010; 104: 254–9.
  2. Nakata Y, Niimi Y. Oral-to-nasal endotracheal tube exchange in patients with bleeding esophageal varices. Anesthesiology 1995; 83: 1380–1.
  3. Ölmez G, Nazaroğlu H, Arslan SG, Özyılmaz MA, Turhanoğlu AD. Difficulties and failure of laryngeal mask insertion in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Turk J Med Sci 2004; 34: 349–52.
  4. Liu EH, Wender R, Goldman AJ. The LMA CTrachTM in patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 941– Dutta A, Chari P, Mohan RA, Manhas Y. Oral to nasal endotracheal tube exchange in a difficult airway: a novel method. Anesthesiology 2002; 97: 1324–5.
  5. Salibian H, Jain S, Gabriel D, Azocar RJ. Conversion of an oral to nasal orotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube exchanger. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1822. Cooper RM. Conversion of a nasal to an oral intubation using an endotracheal tube exchanger. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 717–