Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

Impact of adjuvant treatment on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I leiomyosarcoma of the uterus

Pages
841–846
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Adjuvant therapy did not significantly improve median progression-free survival or median overall survival.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant therapy for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Clinicopathological data of cases of stage I uterine LMS from 1998 to 2015 were retrieved from the computerized database of Hacettepe University Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Adjuvant therapy did not significantly improve median progression-free survival or median overall survival.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant therapy for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Materials and methods: Clinicopathological data of cases of stage I uterine LMS from 1998 to 2015 were retrieved from the computerized database of Hacettepe University Hospital. The Kaplan Meier method was used to estimate survival and progression-free survival, and survival differences were analyzed by log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed to account for the potential influence of confounding factors. Results: We evaluated the outcomes of 35 patients with histologically proven stage I LMS. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years. All patients underwent surgical treatment and 20 patients (57.1%) received adjuvant therapy. Twelve of these patients (34.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 3 (8.6%) received adjuvant pelvic irradiation, and 5 (14.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy with pelvic irradiation. The median follow-up duration was 34 months (range: 3 231 months). Twenty-three (65.7%) patients had a recurrence during follow-up. Adjuvant therapy did not significantly improve median progression-free survival or median overall survival. Cox regression analysis did not demonstrate any significant impact of the factors studied, including age, menopausal status, tumor size, mitotic count, staging surgery, or adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy for surgically treated stage I uterine LMS did not improve oncologic outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜL, N., BOYRAZ, G., BAŞARAN, D., SALMAN, M. C., YÜCE, K. (2022). Impact of adjuvant treatment on oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 841–846. https://ajindex.com/articles/610992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Trope CG, VM Abeler, GB Kristensen. Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review. Acta Oncol 2012; 51: 694- 705
  2. Giuntoli RL, Metzinger DS, DiMarco CS, Cha SS, Sloan JA, Keeney GL, Gostout BS. Retrospective review of 208 patients with leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: prognostic indicators, surgical management, and adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 89: 460-469
  3. D’Angelo E, Espinosa I, Ali R, Gilks CB, Rijn Mv, Lee CH, Prat J. Uterine leiomyosarcomas: tumor size, mitotic index, and biomarkers Ki67, and Bcl-2 identify two groups with different prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 121: 328-333
  4. Kapp DS, Shin JY, Chan JK. Prognostic factors and survival in 1396 patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas: emphasis on impact of lymphadenectomy and oophorectomy. Cancer 2008; 112: 820-830
  5. Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009; 104: 177-178
  6. Dusenbery KE, Potish RA, Judson P. Limitations of adjuvant radiotherapy for uterine sarcomas spread beyond the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94: 191-196
  7. Dinh TA, Oliva EA, Fuller AF Jr, Lee H, Goodman A. The treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Results from a 10-year experience (1990-1999) at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92: 648-652
  8. Amant F, Coosemans A, Debiec-Rychter M, Timmerman D, Vergote I. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 1188-1198
  9. Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG, Morrow CP, Creasman WT, Currie JL, Yordan E, Brady MF. Prognostic factors in early-stage uterine sarcoma. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer 1993; 71: 1702-1709
  10. Amant F, Coosemans A, Renard V, Everaert E, Vergote I. Clinical outcome of ET-743 (Trabectedin; Yondelis) in highgrade uterine sarcomas: report on five patients and a review of the literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 245-248
  11. Abeler VM, Røyne O, Thoresen S, Danielsen HE, Nesland JM, Kristensen GB. Uterine sarcomas in Norway. A histopathological and prognostic survey of a total population from 1970 to 2000 including 419 patients. Histopathology 2009; 54: 355-364
  12. D’Angelo E, Prat J. Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 131-139
  13. Omura GA, Blessing JA, Major F, Lifshitz S, Ehrlich CE, Mangan C, Beecham J, Park R, Silverberg S. A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1985; 3: 1240-1245
  14. Hensley ML, Ishill N, Soslow R, Larkin J, Abu-Rustum N, Sabbatini P