Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

What primary care physicians think about insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes: a feld-based study

Pages
409–415
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of sex, female family physicians were found tobe more uncertain about the timing of initiating insulin treatment for diabetic patients.Conclusion: Tis study shows the necessity of continuous education activities and interventions to promote motivation in familyphysicians to improve care of diabetic patients in primary care.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: A signifcant number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus require insulin and little is known about the possiblephysician-related factors that could cause a delay in the initiation of insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tis study aimedto evaluate those factors.Materials and methods: A total of 87 family physicians working at 36 family health centers in urban Malatya participated in our studyon a voluntary basis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of sex, female family physicians were found tobe more uncertain about the timing of initiating insulin treatment for diabetic patients.Conclusion: Tis study shows the necessity of continuous education activities and interventions to promote motivation in familyphysicians to improve care of diabetic patients in primary care.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: A signifcant number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus require insulin and little is known about the possiblephysician-related factors that could cause a delay in the initiation of insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. Tis study aimedto evaluate those factors.Materials and methods: A total of 87 family physicians working at 36 family health centers in urban Malatya participated in our studyon a voluntary basis. A self-administered survey form was structured to gather the views of the primary care physicians. Te survey wasdeveloped based on a review of the literature. Te survey consisted of Likert scale item questions regarding knowledge about the diseaseof diabetes mellitus and the views of the primary care physicians regarding insulin initiation for type 2 diabetic patients.Results: Almost half of the participants (42.5%, n = 37) felt incompetent in the starting dosage adjustment and 40.2% (n = 35) of theparticipants felt incompetent in maintaining the appropriate dosage adjustment. In terms of sex, female family physicians were found tobe more uncertain about the timing of initiating insulin treatment for diabetic patients.Conclusion: Tis study shows the necessity of continuous education activities and interventions to promote motivation in familyphysicians to improve care of diabetic patients in primary care.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOŞAR, Y., SUCAKLI, M. H., AK, M., CANBAL, M. (2022). What primary care physicians think about insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes: a feld-based study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 409–415. https://ajindex.com/articles/610966

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Furdell, EL. Fatal Tirst: Diabetes in Britain until Insulin. Boston, MA, USA: Brill Academic Publishers; 2009
  2. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Heine RJ, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1963–1972
  3. Peyrot M, Rubin R, Lauritzen T, Skovlond S, Snoek F, Mathews D. Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 2673–2679
  4. Brown J, Nichols G, Perry A. Te burden of treatment failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1535–1540. 5. [No authors listed.] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). VIII. Study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 1991; 34: 877–890
  5. Kasje WN DP, Stewart RE, de Graef PA, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM. An educational programme for peer review groups to improve treatment of chronic heart failure and diabetes mellitus type 2 in general practice. J Eval Clin Pract 2006; 12: 613–621
  6. Korytkowski M. When oral agents fail: practical barriers to starting insulin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 18–24
  7. Ross A, Tildesley H, Ashkenas J. Barriers to efective insulin treatment: the persistence of poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Cur Med Res Opin 2011; 27: 13–20
  8. Brod M, Kongso J, Lessard S, Christensen T. Psychological insulin resistance: patient beliefs and implications for diabetes management. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 23–32
  9. Spann SJ, Nutting PA, Galliher JM, Peterson KA, Pavlik VN, Dickinson LM, Volk RJ. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 23–31
  10. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1047–1053
  11. Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 2013; 10: 120180
  12. Hayes RP, Fitzgerald JT, Jacober SJ. Primary care physician beliefs about insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract 2008; 62: 860–868
  13. Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts N, Kroon L, Janson L. Factors associated with psychological insulin resistance in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care 2010; 33: 1747–1749