Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Healthy subjects' knowledge of surgical complications: a hospital-based survey

Pages
888–894
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The results indicated that a significant percentage of the subjects wanted to be informed of the potential complications of asurgery in the presence of a relative (73.9%, 192/260, P = 0.009).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: There is an ongoing debate about how much a patient should know about serious or frequently occurring risks oftheir surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Three hundred and thirty healthy subjects (151 women, 179 men; mean age: 43.6 ± 17.3 years) were surveyedwith the study questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The results indicated that a significant percentage of the subjects wanted to be informed of the potential complications of asurgery in the presence of a relative (73.9%, 192/260, P = 0.009).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: There is an ongoing debate about how much a patient should know about serious or frequently occurring risks oftheir surgery. In this study, we evaluated healthy subjects perspectives on knowledge of serious surgical complications. Materials and methods: Three hundred and thirty healthy subjects (151 women, 179 men; mean age: 43.6 ± 17.3 years) were surveyedwith the study questionnaire. Social profile, surgical history of the healthy subjects, and presence of a relative while giving preoperativeconsent were assessed. Results: Only 23.5% (39/166) of the subjects were informed about all the potential complications of their previous surgical operationand 44.9% (73/166) did not get any preoperative consent on surgical complications. A statistically significant percentage of subjects whodid not get proper information about the serious complications involved in their surgery indicated a desire for preoperative informedconsent (97.0%, 128/132, P = 0.0001). Conclusion: The results indicated that a significant percentage of the subjects wanted to be informed of the potential complications of asurgery in the presence of a relative (73.9%, 192/260, P = 0.009). Involving a relative in preoperative consent may have a positive effecton the patient and can increase the level of postoperative recall of the risks.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUMLU, E. G., KILIÇ, M., ÖZTÜRK, L., TOKAÇ, M., PARLAK, Ö., YALÇIN, A. (2022). Healthy subjects' knowledge of surgical complications: a hospital-based survey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 888–894. https://ajindex.com/articles/610940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. General Medical Council. Seeking Patients’ Consent: The Ethical Considerations. London, UK: General Medical Council; 1998
  2. General Medical Council. Consent: Patients and Doctors Making Decisions Together. London, UK: General Medical Council
  3. Lloyd A, Hayes P, Bell PR, Naylor AR. The role of risk and benefit perception in informed consent for surgery. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 141–149
  4. Anderson OA, Wearne IM. Informed consent for elective surgery–what is best practice? J R Soc Med 2007; 100: 97–100
  5. Jawaid M, Farhan M, Masood Z, Husnain S. Preoperative informed consent: is it truly informed? Iran J Public Health 2012; 41: 25–30
  6. Liddle C. Preparing patients to undergo surgery. Nurs Times 2012; 108: 12–13
  7. Cawich SO, Barnett AT, Crandon IW, Drew SD, Gordon- Strachan G. From the patient’s perspective: is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals? Perm J 2013; 17: 22–26
  8. Siegal G, Bonnie RJ, Appelbaum PS. Personalized disclosure by information-on-demand: attending to patients’ needs in the informed consent process. J Law Med Ethics 2012; 40: 359– 367
  9. Smith HK, Manjaly JG, Yousri T, Upadhyay N, Taylor H, Nicol SG, Livingstone JA. Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study. Injury 2012; 43: 1534–1538
  10. Sheth A. Informed consent in clinical practice. J Postgrad Med 2003; 49: 287–288
  11. Şahin N, Öztürk A, Özkan Y, Demirhan Erdemir A. What do patients recall from informed consent given before orthopedic surgery? Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44: 469–475
  12. Parzeller M, Wenk M, Zedler B. Patient information and informed consent before and after medical intervention. Dtsch Arztebl 2007; 104: A576–586
  13. Weinstein JN, Clay K, Morgan TS. Informed patient choice: patient-centered valuing of surgical risks and benefits. Health Affair 2007; 26: 726–730
  14. Fusetti C, Lazzaro M, Trobia M, Lucchina S, Petri J, Garavaglia G. Patients’ point of view on informed consent: a prospective study in carpal tunnel surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2013; 42: E111–115
  15. Crepeau AE, McKinney BI, Fox-Ryvicker M, Castelli J, Penna J, Wang ED. Prospective evaluation of patient comprehension of informed consent. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: e114
  16. Mayberry MK, Mayberry JF. Towards better informed consent in endoscopy: a study of information and consent processes in gastroscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Eur J Gastroen