SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of the hip fracture records of a central training and research hospital by selected characteristics

Yalçın ÇAKIR
Abdullah Yalçın TABAK
Deniz ÇANKAYA
Burak YOLDAŞ
Elif ÇANKAYA
Cemal AYDIN
Pages
35–41
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A nationwide survey of different categories of hospitals and various geographic regions of Turkey is also needed to inform effective prevention strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Despite the importance of hip fractures, very few studies have assessed their epidemiological characteristics in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In this descriptive study, we identified hip fracture cases between 2009 and 2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A nationwide survey of different categories of hospitals and various geographic regions of Turkey is also needed to inform effective prevention strategies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Despite the importance of hip fractures, very few studies have assessed their epidemiological characteristics in Turkey. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and demography of hip fractures from the recent data of a central training and research hospital. Materials and methods: In this descriptive study, we identified hip fracture cases between 2009 and 2013. The age, sex, region, injury pattern, and calendar year for all patients were evaluated. Results: Among the 687 patients (488 women, 199 men) described in our clinic s records, 122, 131, 144, 138, and 154 patients applied with hip fractures from the years 2009 to 2013, respectively. The mean ages of the women and men were 74.8 and 68.5 years, respectively. There were 220 patients who had femoral neck fracture (32%), 419 who had intertrochanteric fracture (61%), and 48 who had subtrochanteric fracture (7%). Conclusion: The female geriatric population may have an increasing and distinct hip fracture risk, mainly in the trochanteric region. Furthermore, recent studies that show variations in the frequency and demography of hip fractures highlight the importance of meticulous recording of patients information. A nationwide survey of different categories of hospitals and various geographic regions of Turkey is also needed to inform effective prevention strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKIR, Y., TABAK, A. Y., ÇANKAYA, D., YOLDAŞ, B., ÇANKAYA, E., AYDIN, C. (2022). Analysis of the hip fracture records of a central training and research hospital by selected characteristics. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 35–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/610832

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Pfeilschifter J, Cooper C, Watts NB, Flahive J, Saag KG, Adachi JD, Boonen S, Chapurlat R, Compston JE, Díez-Pérez A et al. Regional and age-related variations in the proportions of hip fractures and major fractures among postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 2179–2188
  2. Gosch M, Wörtz M, Nicholas JA, Doshi HK, Kammerlander C, Lechleitner M. Inappropriate prescribing as a predictor for long-term mortality after hip fracture. Gerontology 2014; 60: 114–122
  3. Halem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, Grice JE, Parker MJ. Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury 2008; 39: 1157–1163
  4. Chang KP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA. Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19: 532–536
  5. Icks A, Haastert B, Glaeske G, Stumpf U, Windolf J, Hoffmann F. Correction factor for the analysis of the hip fracture incidence. Differences between age, sex, region, and calendar year. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2012; 124: 391–394
  6. Senohradski K, Markovic-Denic L, Lesic A, Bumbasirevic V, Bumbasirevic M. Trends in the incidence of hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 2013; 24: 1759–1763
  7. Kim SH, Meehan JP, Blumenfeld T, Szabo RM. Hip fractures in the United States: 2008 Nationwide emergency department sample. Arthritis Care Res 2012; 64: 751–757
  8. Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS, Schei B, Tverdal A, Gjesdal CG, Grimnes G et al. Hip fractures in Norway 1999-2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 2012; 27: 807–814
  9. Maalouf G, Bachour F, Hlais S, Maalouf NM, Yazbeck P, Yaghi Y, Yaghi K, El Hage R, Issa M. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Lebanon: a nationwide survey. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99: 675–880
  10. Azagra R, López-Expósito F, Martin-Sánchez JC, Aguyé A, Moreno N, Cooper C, Díez-Pérez A, Dennison EM. Changing trends in the epidemiology of hip fracture in Spain. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 1267–1274
  11. Çopuroğlu C, Özcan M, Çiftdemir M, Volkan Ünver K, Sarıdoğan K. Frequency of hip fractures admitted to a university hospital for the last ten years. Turk Geriatri Derg 2011; 14: 199–203
  12. Hepgüler S, Cetin A, Değer C, Erkent U. Osteoporotic hip fracture costs in the elderly Turkish population. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45: 316–325
  13. Tuzun S, Eskiyurt N, Aka