Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 6

Biliary stenting in difficult common bile duct stones: a single tertiary center experience

Pages
1779–1785
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: For CBD stones that cannot be removed by standard methods, temporary plastic stenting is an alternative method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: We aimed to examine the effect of plastic biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The data of 13,034 patients in our unit who had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between 2008 and 2015 were scanned retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: For CBD stones that cannot be removed by standard methods, temporary plastic stenting is an alternative method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: We aimed to examine the effect of plastic biliary stenting in the treatment of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Materials and methods: The data of 13,034 patients in our unit who had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) between 2008 and 2015 were scanned retrospectively. Results: A biliary stent was placed in 61 of 74 patients. While the plastic biliary stent was placed in patients, the mean stone size after the 1st ERCP was 20 mm and the bile duct size was 13 mm. At the time of the 2nd ERCP conducted approximately 73.9 days later, the mean stone size was found to be 15 mm and the bile duct size was 12 mm. With recurrent ERCPs, the CBD stone was successfully removed in 53 patients but could not be removed in 8 patients. Among the 53 successful cases, 29 removals were successful in the 2nd ERCP session, 16 were successful in the 3rd session, 2 were successful in the 4th session, 1 was successful in the 5th session, 4 were successful in the 6th session, and 1 was successful in the 7th session. Conclusion: For CBD stones that cannot be removed by standard methods, temporary plastic stenting is an alternative method.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAK, E., DİŞİBEYAZ, S., KAPLAN, M., ATES, İ., YÜKSEL, M., YILDIZ, H., KAYAÇETİN, E. (2022). Biliary stenting in difficult common bile duct stones: a single tertiary center experience. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 6, 1779–1785. https://ajindex.com/articles/610831

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Joyce AM, Heiss FW. Endoscopic evaluation and therapies of biliary disorders. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88: 1221-1240
  2. Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH, Park DI, Cho YK, Sohn CI, Jeon WK, Kim BI, Choi SH. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 1154-1160
  3. Chang WH, Chu CH, Wang TE, Chen MJ, Lin CC. Outcome of simple use of mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 593-596
  4. Binmoeller KF, Bruckner M, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 201-206
  5. Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, Kim YI, Kortan PK. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. American J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2330-2334
  6. Meyenberger C, Meierhofer U, Michel-Harder C, Knuchel J, Wirth HP, Buhler H, Munch R, Altorfer J. Long-term follow-up after treatment of common bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy 1996; 28: 411-417
  7. Gilchrist AM, Ross B, Thomas WE. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for common bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 29- 32
  8. Jakobs R, Maier M, Kohler B, Riemann JF. Peroral laser lithotripsy of difficult intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stones: laser effectiveness using an automatic stone-tissue discrimination system. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 468-473
  9. Hochberger J, Tex S, Maiss J, Hahn EG. Management of difficult common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 623-634
  10. Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tijssen JG, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Biliary endoprostheses in elderly patients with endoscopically irretrievable common bile duct stones: report on 117 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42: 195-201
  11. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Kato N, Kamijima T, Graham DY, Tanaka N. Biliary stenting in the management of large or multiple common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1200-1203.e2
  12. Chan AC, Ng EK, Chung SC, Lai CW, Lau JY, Sung JJ, Leung JW, Li AK. Common bile duct stones become smaller after endoscopic biliary stenting. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 356-359
  13. Jain SK, Stein R, Bhuva M, Goldberg MJ. Pigtail stents: an alternative in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 490-493
  14. Katsinelos P, Galanis I, Pilpilidis I, Paroutoglou G, Tsolkas P,