Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Glycemic index values of monofloral Turkish honeys and the effect oftheir consumption on glucose metabolism

Pages
483–488
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long-term research is needed to compare the effects of honey consumption on healthy and diabetic individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Clinical trials have shown that low glycemic index (GI) nutrition reduces mean blood glucose concentrations and insulin secretions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Processing data from 20 healthy volunteers, GI values were determined from the glycemia values by using the incremental area method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long-term research is needed to compare the effects of honey consumption on healthy and diabetic individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Clinical trials have shown that low glycemic index (GI) nutrition reduces mean blood glucose concentrations and insulin secretions. The aim of the present study was to determine the GI values of various monofloral (citrus, milk-vetch, chestnut, thyme, lime, pine) honeys of Turkey, and the effect of their consumption on glucose metabolism. Materials and methods: Processing data from 20 healthy volunteers, GI values were determined from the glycemia values by using the incremental area method. Serum insulin and C-peptide levels were also measured before and 120 min after the test. Results: The GI values of citrus, thyme, lime, chestnut, pine, and milk-vetch honeys were found to be 44.9, 52.6, 55.3, 55.5, 58.8, and 69, respectively. Serum insulin and C-peptide values after honey consumption were relatively lower than those after reference food (glucose) consumption. By the end of the 120 min, serum insulin levels were significantly higher, while a significant decrease was observed after the consumption of chestnut honey (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Citrus and thyme honeys were determined to have low GI, while serum insulin levels were significantly lower after the consumption of chestnut honey. Long-term research is needed to compare the effects of honey consumption on healthy and diabetic individuals.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATAYOĞLU, A. T., SİLİCİ, S., İNANÇ, N., SOYLU, M. (2022). Glycemic index values of monofloral Turkish honeys and the effect oftheir consumption on glucose metabolism. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 483–488. https://ajindex.com/articles/610779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011
  2. Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, Kalaca S, Gedik S, Dinccag N, Karsidag K, Genc S, Telci A, Canbaz B et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 28: 169–180
  3. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengül A, Salman S, Salman F, Uygur S, Bastar I, Tütüncü Y, Sargın M, Dinççag N et al. The TURDEP group. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the Turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1551– 1556
  4. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. Carbohydrates in human nutrition. (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper-66). Rome, Italy: FAO/WHO; 1998
  5. Al-Mamary M, Al-Meeri A, Al-Habori M. Antioxidant activities and total phenolics of different types of honey. Nutr Res 2002; 22: 1041–1047
  6. O’Sullivan AM, O’Callaghan YC, O’Connor TP, O’Brien NM. Comparison of the antioxidant activity of commercial honeys, before and after in-vitro digestion. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 2013; 63: 167–171
  7. Foster-Powell FK, Holt S, Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 5–56
  8. Abdulrhman M, El-Hefnawy M, Hussein R, El-Goud AA. The glycemic and peak incremental indices of honey, sucrose and glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: Effects on C-peptide level—a pilot study. Acta Diabetol 2011; 48: 89–94
  9. Arcot J, Brand-Miller J. A Preliminary Assessment of the Glycemic Index of Honey. A Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Publication No: 05/027. Sydney, Austria: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation; 2005
  10. Wolever T. How important is prediction of glycemic responses? Diabetes Care 1989; 12: 591–592
  11. Wolever T, Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Josse RG. The glycemic index: methodology and clinical implications. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 54; 846–854
  12. Brouns F, Bjorck K. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 2005; 18: 145–171
  13. Brand-Miller J, Barclay AW, Irwin T. A new food labeling program for glycemic index. Proc Nutr Soc 2001; 25: S21 (abstract)
  14. Atkinson F, Powell K, Miller B. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 2281– 2283
  15. Deibert P, Konig D, Kloock B, Groenefeld M, Berg A. Glycaemic and insulinaemic properties of some German honey varietie