SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Is the Nexfin finger cuff method for cardiac output measurement reliable during coronary artery bypass grafting? A prospective comparison with the echocardiography and FloTrac/Vigileo methods

Fevzi TORAMAN
Halim ULUGÖL
Zehra Serpil USTALAR ÖZGEN
Cem ARITÜRK
Meltem AÇIL
Eyüp Murat ÖKTEN
Hüseyin Cem ALHAN
Sinan DAĞDELEN
Eşref Hasan KARABULUT
Pages
291–295
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nexfin may be used in uncomplicated, hemodynamically stable patients in ICU as a reliable and totally noninvasive method of CO measurement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The aim of the current study was to assess the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurements obtained by the Nexfin finger cuff method as compared with the FloTrac/Vigileo and echocardiography methods in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CO measurements were performed simultaneously by three different contributors and were collected by the fourth one 24 h postoperative in the intensive care unit (ICU).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nexfin may be used in uncomplicated, hemodynamically stable patients in ICU as a reliable and totally noninvasive method of CO measurement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The aim of the current study was to assess the accuracy of cardiac output (CO) measurements obtained by the Nexfin finger cuff method as compared with the FloTrac/Vigileo and echocardiography methods in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. Materials and methods: First-time elective CABG patients were prospectively enrolled in this study and divided into three groups according to CO measurement method. CO measurements were performed simultaneously by three different contributors and were collected by the fourth one 24 h postoperative in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data were statistically analyzed. Results: Seventeen female and 13 male patients between 42 and 78 years of age (with a mean of 56 ± 4) were the subjects of this study. The mean CO measurements were 5.9 ± 1.4 L/min, 5.8 ± 1.1 L/min, and 6.0 ± 1.1 L/min for the Nexfin, FloTrac/Vigileo, and echocardiography methods, respectively (P > 0.05). The correlation values between Nexfin and FloTrac/Vigileo, Nexfin and echocardiography, and FloTrac/Vigileo and echocardiography were r = 0.445, r = 0.377, and r = 0.384, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Nexfin yielded results comparable to those obtained with FloTrac/Vigileo and echocardiography for the postoperative CO assessment of CABG patients. Nexfin may be used in uncomplicated, hemodynamically stable patients in ICU as a reliable and totally noninvasive method of CO measurement.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORAMAN, F., ULUGÖL, H., ÖZGEN, Z. S. U., ARITÜRK, C., AÇIL, M., ÖKTEN, E. M., ALHAN, H. C., DAĞDELEN, S., KARABULUT, E. H. (2022). Is the Nexfin finger cuff method for cardiac output measurement reliable during coronary artery bypass grafting? A prospective comparison with the echocardiography and FloTrac/Vigileo methods. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 291–295. https://ajindex.com/articles/610776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Clifford PS. Local control of blood flow. Adv Physiol Educ 2011; 35: 5–15
  2. Palmers PJ, Vidts W, Ameloot K, Cordemans C, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Eichhorn V, Reuter D et al. Assessment of three minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurement methods in critically ill patients and a review of the literature. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2012; 44: 213–224
  3. Malbrain ML, De Potter P, Deeren D. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In: Vincent JL, editor. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2005. pp. 603–618
  4. Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 887–897
  5. Meregalli A, Oliveira RP, Friedman G. Occult hypoperfusion is associated with increased mortality in hemodynamically stable, high‐risk, surgical patients. Crit Care 2004; 8: 60–65
  6. Veale WN Jr, Morgan JH, Beatty JS, Sheppard SW, Dalton ML, Van de Water JM. Hemodynamic and pulmonary fluid status in the trauma patient: are we slipping? Am Surg 2005; 71: 621– 625
  7. Camporota L, Beale R. Pitfalls in hemodynamic monitoring based on the arterial pressure waveform. Crit Care 2010; 14: 124
  8. Wesseling KH, de Wit B, Weber JA, Smith NT. A simple device for continuous measurement of cardiac output. Adv Cardiovasc Phys 1983; 5: 16–52
  9. Funk DJ, Moretti EW, Gan TJ. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring in the perioperative setting. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 887–897
  10. Wesseling KH, Jansen JRC, Settels JJ, Schreuder JJ. Computation of aortic flow from pressure in humans using a nonlinear, three‐element model. J Applied Physiol 1993; 74: 2566–2573
  11. Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 1220– 1235
  12. Maass SW, Roekaerts PM, Lancé MD. Cardiac output measurement by bioimpedance and noninvasive pulse contour analysis compared with the continuous pulmonary artery thermodilution technique. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2014; 28: 534–539
  13. De Wilde RB, Schreuder JJ, Berg PC Van Den, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 760– 768
  14. Jansen JRC, Schreuder JJ, Mulier JP, Smith NT, Settels JJ, Wesseling KH. A comparison of cardiac output derived from the arterial pressure wave agai