Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based system and Erlich-Ziehl-Neelsen method with culture in the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Pages
203–206
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to these results, we suggest that GeneXpert MTB/RIF is a rapid and reliable system, and when used in company with conventional tests, it would make significant contributions to the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Backgrund/aims: Mycobacterium tuberculosis is still a major health problem throughout the world, especially in developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A total of 927 samples (243 respiratory and 684 nonrespiratory), which were sent to Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty Tuberculosis Laboratory on suspicion of M. tuberculosis, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to these results, we suggest that GeneXpert MTB/RIF is a rapid and reliable system, and when used in company with conventional tests, it would make significant contributions to the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:927 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Backgrund/aims: Mycobacterium tuberculosis is still a major health problem throughout the world, especially in developing countries. Disease control heavily depends on the establishment of early diagnosis. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of culture, GeneXpert MTB/RIF device, and Erlich Ziehl Neelsen direct microscopic method. Materials and methods: A total of 927 samples (243 respiratory and 684 nonrespiratory), which were sent to Ondokuz Mayıs University Medical Faculty Tuberculosis Laboratory on suspicion of M. tuberculosis, were included in the study. Results: When compared to standard culture, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the GeneXpert system for respiratory samples were 100%, 98.7%, 87%, and 100%, respectively; these values for nonrespiratory samples were 71%, 98.6%, 71%, and 98.6%, respectively. Conclusion: New, reliable, rapid, and easy-to-use methods that display high specificity and sensitivity are required for an effective struggle against tuberculosis. According to these results, we suggest that GeneXpert MTB/RIF is a rapid and reliable system, and when used in company with conventional tests, it would make significant contributions to the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

BİLGİN, K., GÜNAYDIN, M., ODABAŞI, H., KARADAĞ, A., YANIK, K., TAŞ, H. (2022). Comparison of a real-time polymerase chain reaction-based system and Erlich-Ziehl-Neelsen method with culture in the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 203–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/610750

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kılıçaslan Z. Dünyada ve Türkiye’de tüberküloz epidemiyolojisi ve kontrolü. In: Uzun Ö, Ünal S, editors. Güncel Bilgiler Işığında İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları II. Ankara, Turkey: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2002. pp. 821–833 (in Turkish)
  2. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 12th ed. St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby Elsevier; 2007
  3. Babacan F, Hasdemir U. Mycobacterium tuberculosis kompleks. In: Topçu AW, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, editors. Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Mikrobiyolojisi. 3rd ed. İstanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2008. pp. 2283–2302 (in Turkish)
  4. Çöplü N. Tüberkülozda mikrobiyolojik tanı. In: Uzun Ö, Ünal S, editors. Güncel Bilgiler Işığında İnfeksiyon Hastalıkları II. Ankara, Turkey: Bilimsel Tıp Yayınevi; 2002. pp. 859–873 (in Turkish)
  5. Saniç A, Çoban AY. Mikobakteriler ve Laboratuar Tanı. Samsun, Turkey: Ondokuz Mayıs University; 1999 (in Turkish)
  6. Kocagöz T. Tüberküloz tanısında kullanılan moleküler yöntemler. In: Ağaçfidan A, Badur S, Türkoğlu S, editors. İnfeksiyon Hastalıklarının Laboratuar Tanısında Moleküler Yöntemler. İstanbul, Turkey: M.G.G. AS Matbaacılık; 2002. pp. 189–195 (in Turkish)
  7. Winn W, Allen S, Janda W, Koneman E, Procop G, Schreckenberger P. Koneman’s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006
  8. Vincent V, Gutierrez MC. Mycobacterium: Laboratory characteristics of slowly growing mycobacteria. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 9th ed. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2007. pp. 573–588
  9. Özyurt M. Akciğer ve akciğer dışı tüberküloz tanısında moleküler yöntemlerin kullanımı. Mikrobiyol Bul 2012; 46: 319–331 (in Turkish)
  10. Durmaz R. Mycobacterium tuberculosis suşlarında direncin belirlenmesinde moleküler yöntemler/son gelişmeler. ANKEM Derg 2010; 24 (Suppl. 2): 64–70 (in Turkish)
  11. Bunsow E, Ruiz-Serrano MJ, Roa PL, Kestler M, Viedma DG, Bouza E. Evaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in clinical specimens. J Infection 2014; 68: 338–343
  12. Hillemann D, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Boehme C, Richter E. Rapid molecular detection of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by the automated GeneXpert MTB/RIF system. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 1202–1205
  13. Ioannidis P, Papaventsis D, Karabela S, Nikolaou S, Panagi M, Raftopoulou E, Konstantinidou E, Marinou I, Kanavaki S. Cepheid GeneXpert