Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3

Does previous open or percutaneous renal stone surgery affect retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes?

Pages
1310–1316
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall rate of postoperative complications was higher in Group 1 (p = 0.019), but there was no difference between the two groups in terms of Clavien 1–2 and 3–4a complication rates.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Open or percutaneous renal stone surgery can have an adverse effect on the collecting system of the kidney.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We evaluated retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes in patients with ≤30 mm renal stones who had open or percutaneous renal stone surgery history.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall rate of postoperative complications was higher in Group 1 (p = 0.019), but there was no difference between the two groups in terms of Clavien 1–2 and 3–4a complication rates.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Open or percutaneous renal stone surgery can have an adverse effect on the collecting system of the kidney. We evaluated retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes in patients with ≤30 mm renal stones who had open or percutaneous renal stone surgery history. Materials and methods: A total of 707 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery treatment were included in this study. Fifty-six patients had open or percutaneous renal stone surgery history (Group 1) and the remaining did not (Group 2, n = 651). The groups were compared in terms of age, stone size, stone-free rates, and complications. Results: The mean age of the patients was 51.16 ± 14.8 and 45.95 ± 14.6 years in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.008). The mean stone size was 14.97 ± 6.1 mm and 16.47 ± 6.9 mm in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.107). The stone-free rates were 71.4% and 84.1% in Group 1 and 2 respectively and it was significantly higher in Group 2 (p = 0.013). The overall rate of postoperative complications was higher in Group 1 (p = 0.019), but there was no difference between the two groups in terms of Clavien 1–2 and 3–4a complication rates. Conclusion: Our results showed that having a history of open or percutaneous renal stone surgery has a negative effect on the success and complication rates in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Therefore, patients should be well informed before this operation.Key words: Kidney stone, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, open renal surgery

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, M., ASLAN, Y., GÜZEL, Ö., AYKANAT, C., ASFUROĞLU, A. (2022). Does previous open or percutaneous renal stone surgery affect retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes?. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 51 - Sayı: 3, 1310–1316. https://ajindex.com/articles/610706

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Seitz C, Fajkovic H. Epidemiological gender‐specific aspects in urolithiasis. World Journal of Urology 2013
  2. 31 (5): 1087‐1092. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1140-1 2. De SK, Liu X, Monga M. Changing trends in the American diet and the rising prevalence of kidney stones. Urology 2014
  3. 84 (5): 1030‐1033. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.037 3. Muslumanoglu AY, Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, Tepeler A et al. Updated epidemiologic study of urolithiasis in Turkey.I: Changing characteristics of urolithiasis. Urological Research 2011
  4. 39 (4): 309‐314. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0346-6 4. Tefekli A, Tok A, Altunrende F, Barut M, Berberoglu Y et al. Life style and nutritional habits in cases with urinary stone disease. Turkish Journal of Urology 2005
  5. 31 (1): 113-118. 5. Chaussy C, Eisenberger F, Forssmann B. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL): a chronology. Journal of Endourology 2007
  6. 21 (11): 1249‐1253. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9880 6. Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, Diri A, Atıs G et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones. World Journal of Urology 2013
  7. 31 (6): 1581-1586. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1 7. Ho CC, Hafidzul J, Praveen S, Goh EH, Bong JJ et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones smaller than 2 cm. Singapore Medical Journal 2010
  8. Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Ugurlu M, Tekinarslan E et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU International 2012
  9. 109 (9): 1384-1389. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10691.x 9. Chung KJ, Kim JH, Min GE, Park HK, Li S et al. Changing trends in the treatment of nephrolithiasis in the real world. Journal Of Endourology 2019
  10. 33 (3): 248-253. doi:10.1089/end.2018.0667 10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of Surgery 2004
  11. 240 (2): 205-213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934. ae 11. Riley JM, Stearman L and Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. Journal of Endourology 2009
  12. 23 (9): 1395-1398. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0391 12. Al Busaidy SS, Kurukkal SN, Al Hooti QM, Alsaraf MS, Al Mamari SA et al. Is RIRS emerging as the preferred option for the management of 2 cm-4 cm renal stones: our experience. Canadian Journ