Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2016 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Growth of biometric components and development of refractive errors in premature infants with or without retinopathy of prematurity

Pages
468–473
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The maximum elongation was observed in vitreous length and axial length.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: To investigate the biometric components and refractive errors in premature infants with or without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Infants with or without ROP were grouped according to postmenstrual age at the time of ocular examination: Group 1, ≤33 weeks; Group 2, 34 37 weeks; Group 3, 38 41 weeks; Group 4, 42 45 weeks; Group 5, ≥46 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The maximum elongation was observed in vitreous length and axial length.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: To investigate the biometric components and refractive errors in premature infants with or without retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Materials and methods: Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous length, and axial length were measured with an ultrasound biometer. Cycloplegic refraction was performed by streak skiascopy. Infants with or without ROP were grouped according to postmenstrual age at the time of ocular examination: Group 1, ≤33 weeks; Group 2, 34 37 weeks; Group 3, 38 41 weeks; Group 4, 42 45 weeks; Group 5, ≥46 weeks. Results: The mean postnatal age of 894 infants (451 females and 443 males) was 8.7 ± 4.5 weeks, gestational age was 30.9 ± 2.8 weeks, and birth weight was 1506 ± 484 g. In Group 2, the mean vitreous length and axial length of infants with ROP were significantly lower than those of infants without ROP (P = 0.011, P = 0.001). The mean anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, spherical equivalent, and astigmatism in all groups did not differ significantly among the infants with or without ROP (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous length, and axial length showed a linear growth throughout the follow-up period. The maximum elongation was observed in vitreous length and axial length.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, Ö., TUNAY, Z. Ö., ACAR, D. E. (2022). Growth of biometric components and development of refractive errors in premature infants with or without retinopathy of prematurity. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 468–473. https://ajindex.com/articles/610673

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Koh KS. Premature labour. Can Med Assoc J 1976; 17; 700– 707
  2. Fielder AR, Levene MI. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 860–867
  3. Goktas A, Sener EC, Sanac AS. An assessment of ocular morbidities of children born prematurely in early childhood. J Pediat Ophth Strab 2012; 49: 236–241
  4. Sarikabadayi YU, Aydemir O, Ozen ZT, Aydemir C, Tok L, Oguz SS, Erdeve O, Uras N, Dilmen U. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in a large tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Turkey: frequency and risk factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2011; 18: 269–274
  5. Aydemir O, Sarikabadayi YU, Aydemir C, Tunay ZO, Tok L, Erdeve O, Oguz SS, Uras N, Dilmen U. Adjusted poor weight gain for birth weight and gestational age as a predictor of severe ROP in VLBW infants. Eye (Lond) 2011; 25: 725–729
  6. Varughese S, Varghese RM, Gupta N, Ojha R, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM. Refractive error at birth and its relation to gestational age. Curr Eye Res 2005; 30: 423–428
  7. Cook A, White S, Batterbury M, Clark D. Ocular growth and refractive error development in premature infants with or without retinopathy of prematurity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49: 5199–5207
  8. Rabin J, Van Sluyters RC, Malach R. Emmetropization: a vision-dependent phenomenon. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 1981; 20: 561–564
  9. Ober RR, Palmer EA, Drack AV, Wright KW. Retinopathy of prematurity. In: Wright KW, Spiegel PH, Thompson LS, editors. Handbook of Pediatric Retinal Disease. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2006. pp. 284–349
  10. Graham MV, Gray OP. Refraction of premature babies’ eyes. Br Med J 1963; 1: 1452–1454
  11. American Academy of Pediatrics. Screening examination of premature infants for retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 809–811
  12. Atebara NH, Asbell PA, Azar DT, Ellis FJ, Church F, Faye EE, Hoffer KJ. Clinical refraction. In: Skuta GL, Cantor LB, Weiss JS, editors. Clinical Optics. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011. pp. 121–129
  13. Committee for the Classification of ROP. An international classification of ROP. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 1130–1134
  14. Modrzejewska M. Retinopathy of prematurity: clinical findings and current opinions on diagnosis and treatment. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2006; 52: 73–78 (in Polish with abstract in English)
  15. Asano MK, Dray PB. Retinopathy of prematurity. Dis Mon 2014; 60: 282–291
  16. O’Connor AR, Stephenson T, Johnson A, Tobin MJ, Moseley MJ, Ratib S, Ng Y, Fielder AR. Long-term ophth