Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

Screening of immunocompromised patients at risk of strongyloidiasis in western Turkey using ELISA and real-time PCR

Pages
897–901
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the results showed that more systematic studies are required in Turkey to show the prevalence of strongyloidiasis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Strongyloides stercoralis causes life-threatening hyperinfection or disseminated strongyloidiasis in immunocompromised patients such as HIV-positive, organ transplantation, and cancer patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Serum and stool samples were collected from 108 patients (25.9% of them were chronic renal failure and 74.1% were renal transplantation patients) who were admitted to Ege University Medical School in İzmir, located in western Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the results showed that more systematic studies are required in Turkey to show the prevalence of strongyloidiasis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Strongyloides stercoralis causes life-threatening hyperinfection or disseminated strongyloidiasis in immunocompromised patients such as HIV-positive, organ transplantation, and cancer patients. This study investigated the presence of strongyloidiasis in immunocompromised patients for the first time in Turkey. Materials and methods: Serum and stool samples were collected from 108 patients (25.9% of them were chronic renal failure and 74.1% were renal transplantation patients) who were admitted to Ege University Medical School in İzmir, located in western Turkey. Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA (DRG, Germany) and the presence of 18S rRNA gene of S. stercoralis was detected in stool samples by real-time PCR. Results: The analysis of serum samples showed that only one patient was anti-S. stercoralis IgG antibody and real-time PCR positive (0.92%). The patient was treated twice with albendazole (400 mg/day for 3 days) at 2-week intervals. Follow up real-time PCR was negative and the patient became seronegative 6 months after the initial diagnosis. Conclusion: This screening showed that the prevalence of strongyloidiasis in this small group of patients who were at risk of strongyloidiasis was 0.92%. Overall, the results showed that more systematic studies are required in Turkey to show the prevalence of strongyloidiasis.

🔖

Cite This Article

DÖŞKAYA, M., YILMAZ, M., CANER, A., TÖZ, H., PULLUKÇU, H., GÜRÜZ3, A. Y., CAN, H., KIVRAK, E. E., ŞAHAR, E. A., TAŞBAKAN, M. I. (2022). Screening of immunocompromised patients at risk of strongyloidiasis in western Turkey using ELISA and real-time PCR. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 897–901. https://ajindex.com/articles/610581

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Genta RM. Global prevalence of strongyloidiasis: critical review epidemiologic insights into the prevention of disseminated disease. Rev Infect Dis 1989; 11: 755-767
  2. Puthiyakunnon S, Boddu S, Li Y, Zhou X, Wang C, Li J, Chen X. Strongyloidiasis—an insight into its global prevalence and management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014; 8: e3018
  3. Adedayo O, Grell G, Bellot P. Hyperinfective strongyloidiasis in the medical ward: review of 27 cases in 5 years. South Med J 2002; 95: 711-716
  4. Siddiqui AA, Berk S. Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 1040-1047
  5. Requena-Méndez A, Chiodini P, Bisoffi Z, Buonfrate D, Gotuzzo E, Muñoz J. The laboratory diagnosis and follow up of strongyloidiasis: a systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2002
  6. Buonfrate D, Sequi M, Mejia R, Cimino RO, Krolewiecki AJ, Albonico M, Degani M, Tais S, Angheben A, Requena-Mendez A et al. Accuracy of five serologic tests for the follow up of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2015; 9: e0003491
  7. Schär F, Trostdorf U, Giardina F, Khieu V, Muth S, Marti H, Vounatsou P, Odermatt P. Strongyloides stercoralis: global distribution and risk factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013; 7: e2288
  8. Ardıç N. Strongyloides stercoralis ve enfeksiyonlarına genel bakış. Mikrobiyol Bul 2009; 43: 169-177
  9. Koltaş İS, Çulha G, Mıdıklı M, Aras D, Tanrıverdi S, Özcan K. Türkiye Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Balcalı Hastanesinde yatarak tedavi gören hastalarda bağırsak parazitlerinin dağılımı. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 1999; 23: 291-293
  10. Akyan B, Çağlar K, Kuştimur S. Gaita örneklerindeki protozoonların trikrom boyası kullanılarak değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2005; 29: 34-38
  11. Alver O, Özakın C, Yılmaz E, Akçağlar, Töre O. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesinde farklı yıllarda bağırsak parazit dağılımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2005; 29: 193-199
  12. Doğan N, Demirüstü C, Aybey A. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesinin beş yıllık bağırsak paraziti prevalansının türlere ve cinsiyetlere göre dağılımı. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 2008; 32: 120-125
  13. Duran G, Mete Ö. Bölgemizde görülen barsak parazitlerinin epidemiyolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergisi 1993; 17: 35-41
  14. Hökelek M, Eroğlu C, Uyar Y, Sancak R, Kılınç M. İlköğretim çağındaki çocuklarda, barsak parazitlerinin ağırlık ve boy persentil değerlerine etkisinin araştırılması. Türkiye Parazitoloji Dergis