Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Repeated prevalence studies of nosocomial infections in one university hospital in Serbia

Pages
563–569
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The prevalence of infected patients and the overall prevalence of nosocomial infections was 6.2% and 7.1% in 2003, 4.6% and 4.6% in 2005, and 7.6% and 8.7% in 2009, respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Nosocomial infections occur worldwide and affect both developed and resource-poor countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Three-point prevalence surveys were conducted in the Clinical Center of Kragujevac (1240 beds).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The prevalence of infected patients and the overall prevalence of nosocomial infections was 6.2% and 7.1% in 2003, 4.6% and 4.6% in 2005, and 7.6% and 8.7% in 2009, respectively.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Nosocomial infections occur worldwide and affect both developed and resource-poor countries. The aim of this paper was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for nosocomial infections in one Serbian hospital. Materials and methods: Three-point prevalence surveys were conducted in the Clinical Center of Kragujevac (1240 beds). The standard definitions for nosocomial infections of the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention were used. The authors conducted surveys according to the same protocol. Results: The prevalence of infected patients and the overall prevalence of nosocomial infections was 6.2% and 7.1% in 2003, 4.6% and 4.6% in 2005, and 7.6% and 8.7% in 2009, respectively. In all three studies, the risk factors for nosocomial infections were older age, intravascular catheters, urinary catheters, longer hospital stays, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, and surgeries. According to the multivariate regression analysis, a prolonged hospitalization and use of a urinary catheter were independent risk factors for nosocomial infections in the first and second study. Conclusion: The overall healthcare-associated infection prevalence in our hospital increased from 2003 to 2009, and this was an incentive for a better definition of infection control priorities in high-risk departments.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ljiljana, M., ILIC, M. (2022). Repeated prevalence studies of nosocomial infections in one university hospital in Serbia. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 563–569. https://ajindex.com/articles/610528

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. World Health Organization. Report on the Burden of Endemic Health Care-Associated Infection Worldwide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011
  2. Allegranzi B, Bagheri Nejad S, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Burden of endemic health-careassociated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377: 228-241
  3. Marchetti A, Rossiter R. Economic burden of healthcareassociated infection in US acute care hospitals: societal perspective. J Med Econ 2013; 16: 1399-1404
  4. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16: 128-140
  5. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36: 309-332
  6. Centers for Disease Prevention and Control. CDC/NHSN Surveillance for Specific Types of Infections. Atlanta, GA, USA: CDC; 2016
  7. Ministry of Health, Republic of Serbia. Rulebook on Prevention, Early Detection and Suppression of Hospital Infections. Official Gazette No. 101/13. Belgrade, Serbia: Ministry of Health, Republic of Serbia; 2013
  8. Mayon-White RT, Ducel G, Kereselidze T, Tikomirov E. An international survey of the prevalence of hospital-acquired infection. J Hosp Infect 1988; 11 (Suppl. A): 43-48
  9. Eriksen HM,Iversen BG,Aavitsland P.Prevalence of nosocomial infections in hospitals in Norway, 2002 and 2003. Hosp Infect 2005; 60: 40-45
  10. Gordts B, Vrijens F, Hulstaert F, Devriese S, Van de Sande S. The 2007 Belgian national prevalence survey for hospital-acquired infections. J Hosp Infect 2010; 75: 163-167
  11. Sax H, Uçkay I, Balmelli C, Bernasconi E, Boubaker K, Mühlemann K, Ruef C, Troillet N, Widmer A, Zanetti G et al. Overall burden of healthcare-associated infections among surgical patients. Results of a national study. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 365-370
  12. Smyth ET, McIlvenny G, Enstone JE, Emmerson AM, Humphreys H, Fitzpatrick F, Davies E, Newcombe RG, Spencer RC; Hospital Infection Society Prevalence Survey Steering Group. Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results. J Hosp Infect 2008; 69: 230-248
  13. Lyytikäinen O, Kanerva M, Agthe N, Möttönen T, Ruutu P; Finnish Prevalence Survey Study Group. Healthcareassociated infections in Finnish acute care hospitals: a national prevalence survey, 2005. J Hosp Infect 200