Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

The prevalence of abdominal obesity is remarkable for underweight and normal weight adolescent girls

Pages
1191–1197
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, abdominal obesity should be regularly assessed for nonobese adolescents to prevent cardiovascular risks, metabolic syndrome, and other related disease

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Obesity is a global public health challenge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a total of 1111 adolescent girls aged 12 18 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, abdominal obesity should be regularly assessed for nonobese adolescents to prevent cardiovascular risks, metabolic syndrome, and other related disease
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Obesity is a global public health challenge. This study was carried out in order to determine the prevalence of obesity and abdominal obesity in Turkish adolescent girls. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a total of 1111 adolescent girls aged 12 18 years. The subjects were classified into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight, and obese. Abdominal obesity was defined according to waist circumference (WC) ≥ 90th percentile for Turkish adolescent population references (12 17 years) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) ≥ 0.5. Results: The prevalence of underweight was 17.4%, normal weight 68.5%, overweight 12.1%, and obese 2.0%. A total of 16.9% subjects were abdominal obese based on WC and 10.4% based on WHtR. When the four groups were evaluated in terms of abdominal obesity status, prevalence was 6.4% and 2.6% in the underweight, 14.6% and 5.8% in the normal, 60.0% and 37.3% in the overweight, and 88.8% and 77.3% in the obese groups according to WC and WHtR, respectively. Both WC (r: 0.332) and WHtR (r: 0.156) were positively correlated with age (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of abdominal obesity was found at high levels for overweight and obese adolescents. It should be emphasized that abdominal obesity is a condition that should be considered for underweight and normal adolescents as well. Therefore, abdominal obesity should be regularly assessed for nonobese adolescents to prevent cardiovascular risks, metabolic syndrome, and other related disease

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKÖZÜ, D., TEK, N. A., ŞANLIER, N. (2022). The prevalence of abdominal obesity is remarkable for underweight and normal weight adolescent girls. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 1191–1197. https://ajindex.com/articles/610498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. World Health Organization: Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention. Geneva: WHO Document Production Services; 2012. 2. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E. Global prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity among preschool children. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 1257-1264
  2. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011: With Special Features on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville, MD, USA; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012
  3. Turkey Nutrition and Health Survey-2010. Assessment of Nutritional Status and Habits Final Report. Ministry of Health Publication No.931, Ankara; 2014
  4. Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T. Do obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med 1993; 22: 167-177
  5. Freedman DS, Kettel L, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 22-27
  6. Graves L, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Ness A, Sattar N, Lawlor DA. Waist-to-height ratio and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence: findings from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatr Obes 2014; 9: 327-338
  7. Shulman GI. Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 2000; 106: 171-176
  8. Després JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature 2006; 444: 881-887
  9. Murphy RA, Bureyko TF, Miljkovic I, Cauley JA, Satterfield S, Hue TF, Klepin HD, Cummings SR, Newman AB, Harris TB. Association of total adiposity and computed tomographic measures of regional adiposity with incident cancer risk: a prospective population-based study of older adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2014; 39: 687-692
  10. Griffiths C, Gately P, Marchant PR, Cooke CB. A five year longitudinal study investigating the prevalence of childhood obesity: comparison of BMI and waist circumference. Public Health 2013; 127: 1090-1096
  11. Ashwell M, Hsieh SD. Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2005; 56: 303- 307
  12. Aeberli I, Gut-Knabenhans M, Kusche-Ammann RS, Molinari L, Zimmermann MB. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio percentiles in a nationally representative sample of 6–13 year old children in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 141: 13227
  13. Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Shrewsbury