Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3

A comparison of usage of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM in denticulate and edentulate geriatric patients

Pages
854–860
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We conclude that this effect could have important implications for anesthesiologists managing edentulous geriatric patients with supraglottic airway devices.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Mask ventilation in geriatric and edentulous patients can be ineffective or even impossible because of the shape inside the patients cheeks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to compare the use of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM in denticulate and edentulate patients aged over 65 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We conclude that this effect could have important implications for anesthesiologists managing edentulous geriatric patients with supraglottic airway devices.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Mask ventilation in geriatric and edentulous patients can be ineffective or even impossible because of the shape inside the patients cheeks. For patients for whom a mask cannot be used for long, the use of a laryngeal mask can ease the administration of anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare the use of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM in denticulate and edentulate patients aged over 65 years. Materials and methods: This prospective study included patients according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists I III classification, aged 65 years or more. The patients were divided into two groups: a dentulous group (n = 33) and an edentulous group (n = 33). The success of the first attempt of insertion, ease of insertion, time taken to insert, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were measured. After insertion of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM, a researcher who was unaware of whether the patients had teeth or not conducted an oropharyngeal leak test. Results: The success rate of inserting the laryngeal mask UniqueTM on the first attempt was higher in the dentulous group than in the edentulous group. Ease of insertion, time taken to insert, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and laryngopharyngeal morbidity were similar for each group. Conclusion: In this study, successful insertion of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM was higher in dentulous than in edentulous patients. We conclude that this effect could have important implications for anesthesiologists managing edentulous geriatric patients with supraglottic airway devices.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUVAKİ, B., KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, S., ÖZBİLGİN, Ş., SARI, M. A., GENEZ, M., BEYDEŞ, T. (2022). A comparison of usage of the laryngeal mask UniqueTM in denticulate and edentulate geriatric patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 3, 854–860. https://ajindex.com/articles/610495

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Butterworth JF, Mackey DC, Wasnick JD. Geriatric anesthesia. In: Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology. 5th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2013. pp. 907-917
  2. Racine SX, Solis A, Hamou NA, Letoumelin P, Hepner DL, Beloucif S, Baillard C. Face mask ventilation in edentulous patients: a comparison of mandibular groove and lower lip placement. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 1190-1193
  3. Jones JR. Laryngeal mask airway: an alternative for the difficult airway. AANA J 1995; 63: 444-449
  4. Brimacombe J. Analysis of 1500 laryngeal mask uses by an anaesthetist in adult undergoing routine anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1996; 51: 76-80
  5. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapilaand R, Pollard A. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway--the LMAunique. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 677-679
  6. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Morris R. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 921-924
  7. Ryu J, Oh AY, Baek JS, Kim JH, Park SH, Noh JM. Remifentanil dose for laryngeal mask airway insertion with a single standard dose of propofol during emergency airway management in elderly patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014; 66: 278-282
  8. Ezri T, Ady N, Szmuk P, Glanz L, Shklar B, Katz J, Geva D. Use of cuffed oropharyngeal vs laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 363-367
  9. Aviv JE. Effects of aging on sensitivity of the pharyngeal and supraglottic areas. Am J Med 1994; 103: 74-76
  10. Dundee JW, Robinson FP, McCollum JS, Patterson CC. Sensitivity to propofol in the elderly. Anaesthesia 1986; 41: 482-485
  11. Francksen H, Renner J, Hanss R, Scholz J, Doerges V, Bein B. A comparison of the i-gel with the LMA Unique in nonparalysed anaesthetised adult patients. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1118-1124
  12. López AM, Valero R, Bovaira P, Pons M, Sala-Blanch X, Anglada T. A clinical evaluation of four disposable laryngeal masks in adult patients. J Clin Anesth 2008; 20: 514-520
  13. Voyagis GS, Batzioulis PG, Secha-Doussaitau PN. Selection of the proper size of laryngeal mask airway in adults. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 658-667
  14. Uppal V, Gangaiah S, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Randomized crossover comparison between the i-gel and the LMA Unique in anesthetised, paralyzed adults. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 882- 885
  15. Verghese C, Berlet J, Kapilaand R, Pollard A. Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway—the LMAUnique. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 677-679
  16. Conlon NP, Sulliv