Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 6

Histopathological effects of mesenchymal stem cells in rats with bladder and posterior urethral injuries

Pages
1912–1919
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: MSC treatment significantly decreased the development of fibrosis in a uroepithelial injury model.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: To evaluate the effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy in an experimental bladder and posterior urethral injury model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The study subjects consisted of 40 male Wistar albino rats that were divided into four groups: control group (n = 10) (the bladder was only surgically opened and closed), sham group (n = 10) (surgical procedure), IVMSC group (n= 10) (surgical procedure and intravenous MSC treatment), and LMSC group (n = 10) (surgical procedure and local MSC treatment).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: MSC treatment significantly decreased the development of fibrosis in a uroepithelial injury model.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: To evaluate the effects of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy in an experimental bladder and posterior urethral injury model. Materials and methods: The study subjects consisted of 40 male Wistar albino rats that were divided into four groups: control group (n = 10) (the bladder was only surgically opened and closed), sham group (n = 10) (surgical procedure), IVMSC group (n= 10) (surgical procedure and intravenous MSC treatment), and LMSC group (n = 10) (surgical procedure and local MSC treatment). Histopathological evaluation was performed for the degree of fibrosis and inflammation and the extent and intensity of staining of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and endoglin (CD105). Results: There were no significant differences between the control and LMSC groups with respect to fibrosis (P = 0.070) or inflammation (P = 0.048). Fibrosis and inflammation were significantly lower in the IVMSC (P = 0.034 for fibrosis, P = 0.080 for inflammation) and LMSC (P = 0.01 for fibrosis, P = 0.013 for inflammation) groups when compared with the sham group. No significant differences regarding fibrosis and inflammation were observed between the IVMSC and LMSC groups (P = 0.198 for fibrosis, P = 0.248 for inflammation). A significant difference was noted between the sham and LMSC groups concerning VEGF staining intensity (P = 0.017). However, no significant difference was found among the groups with regard to the extent or intensity of CD105 staining (P > 0.05). Conclusion: MSC treatment significantly decreased the development of fibrosis in a uroepithelial injury model.

🔖

Cite This Article

BIÇAKCI, Ü., DEMİREL, B. D., AYDIN, O., RIZALAR, R., PINARLI, F. A. (2022). Histopathological effects of mesenchymal stem cells in rats with bladder and posterior urethral injuries. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 6, 1912–1919. https://ajindex.com/articles/610481

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Pichler R, Fritsch H, Skradski V, Horninger W, Schlenck B, Rehder P, Oswald J. Diagnosis and management of pediatric urethral injuries. Urol Int 2012; 89: 136-142
  2. Delaney KM, Reddy SH, Dayama A, Stone ME Jr, Meltzer JA. Risc factors associated with bladder and urethral injuries in female children with pelvic fractures: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80: 472-476
  3. Aggarwal SK, Sinha SK, Kumar A, Pant N, Borkar NK, Dhua A. Traumatic structures of the posterior urethra in boys with special reference to recurrent strictures. J Pediatr Urol 2011; 7: 356-362
  4. Minguell JJ, Erices A, Conget P. Mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Biol Med 2001; 226: 507-520
  5. Ding DC, SHYU WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant 2011; 20: 5-14
  6. Kelahmetoglu O, Demir R, Okten G, Demir A, Alpaslan Pinarli F, Diraman E. The effect of mesenchymal stem cells and sildenafil on flap viability in perforator-based flaps for ischemia/ reperfusion injury: an experimental study. Microsurgery 2016; 36: 402-409
  7. Liu L, Chiu PW, Lam PK, Poon CC, Lam CC, Ng EK, Lai PB. Effect of local injection of mesenchymal stem cells on healing of sutured gastric perforation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 158-168
  8. Bhansali S, Kumar V, Saikia UN, Medhi B, Jha V, Bhansali A, Dutta P. Effect of mesenchymal stem cells transplantation on glycaemic profile & their localization in streptozotocin induced diabetic Wistar rats. Indian J Med Res 2015; 142: 63-71
  9. Wang K, Guan Y, Liu Y, Zhu M, Li T, An D, Qu L, Che Y, Zhang G, Zhang J, Zheng XL, Kong D. Fibrin glue with autogenic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for urethral injury repair in rabbit model. Tissue Eng Part A 2012; 18: 2507-2517
  10. Vaegler M, Lenis AT, Daum L, Amend B, Stenzl A, Toomey P, Renninger M, Damaser MS, Sievert KD. Stem cell therapy for voiding and erectile dysfunction. Nat Rev Urol 2012; 9: 435- 447
  11. Ayyıldız A, Nuhoğlu B, Gülerkaya B. Effect of intraurethral mitomycin-C on healing and fibrosis in rats with experimentally induced urethral stricture. Int J Urol 2004; 11: 1122-1126
  12. Aydin O, Yildiz L, Kefeli M, Kandemir B. CD117 expression in normal, neoplastic, inflammatory, and reactive lesions of the thyroid. Pathol Res Pract 2008; 204: 359-365
  13. Onen A, Subası M, Arslan H, Ozen S, Basuguy E. Long-term urologic, orthopedic, and psychological outcome of posterior urethral rupture in children. Urology 2005; 66: 174-179
  14. Kucukaydin M, Ciftle