Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 6

Superiorly based nasolabial island flap for reconstruction of the lateral lower eyelid

Pages
1673–1680
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the superiorly based nasolabial island flap provides a reliable means of obtaining good wound healing with acceptable aesthetics, as well as functional results of both the donor site and reconstructed area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Various flap procedures have been described and used for the lower eyelids; however, the nasolabial flap is rarely employed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: Nine patients with a mean age of 62 ± 6 years underwent surgery for reconstruction of the lower eyelid.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the superiorly based nasolabial island flap provides a reliable means of obtaining good wound healing with acceptable aesthetics, as well as functional results of both the donor site and reconstructed area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Various flap procedures have been described and used for the lower eyelids; however, the nasolabial flap is rarely employed. We herein aimed to present the clinical results of using the superiorly based nasolabial island flap for repair of surgical defects extending to the lateral lower eyelid. Materials and methods: Nine patients with a mean age of 62 ± 6 years underwent surgery for reconstruction of the lower eyelid. Results: The diagnosis of lesions was nodular basal-cell carcinoma (n = 5), superficial basal-cell carcinoma (n = 1), well-differentiated squamous-cell carcinoma (n = 1), and basosquamous-cell carcinoma (n = 2). According to the classification reported by Spinelli and Jelks, 6 surgical defects were located at zones II and IV, while 3 were at zones II and V. Five patients required posterior lamellar reconstruction. Lagopthalmos (n = 1), ectropion (n = 1), and transient numbness of the ipsilateral upper lip (n = 1) were noted as postoperative complications. Conclusion: Despite the low number of patients, the present series demonstrated that lower eyelid defects involving zone IV or zone V can be repaired safely and reliably with the superiorly based nasolabial island flap, along with its use shown in the literature for zone II or zone III defects. The technique for raising the flap is fairly simple, with predictable surgical results. In addition, the superiorly based nasolabial island flap provides a reliable means of obtaining good wound healing with acceptable aesthetics, as well as functional results of both the donor site and reconstructed area.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yontar, Y., ÖZMEN, S., TATAR, S. (2022). Superiorly based nasolabial island flap for reconstruction of the lateral lower eyelid. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 6, 1673–1680. https://ajindex.com/articles/610448

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Nicolas Uzcategui. Eyelid reconstruction. In: Yen MT, editor. Surgery of the Eyelid, Lacrimal System, and Orbit. 2nded. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 2011. pp. 37-51
  2. Stein JD, Antonyshyn M. Aesthetic eyelid reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36: 379-397
  3. Spinelli HM, Jelks GW. Periocular reconstruction: a systematic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91: 1017-1024
  4. Lamont M, Jayaramachandran R, Tyers T. Transposed cheek flap in lower lid reconstruction: a retrospective case note review. Orbit 2011; 30: 261-264
  5. Tenz el RR, Stewart WB. Eyelid reconstruction by the semicircle flap technique. Ophthalmology 1978; 85: 1164-1169
  6. Hughes WL. A new method for rebuilding a lower lid: report of a case. Arch Ophthalmol 1937; 17: 1008-1017
  7. Labbé D, Benateau H, Rigot-Jolivet M. [Homage to Leon Tripier. Description of the first musculocutaneous flap and current indications]. Annales Chir Plast Esthet 2000; 45: 17-23 (article in French with an abstract in English)
  8. McGregor IA. Eyelid reconstruction following subtotal resection of upper or lower lid. Br J Plast Surg 1973; 26: 346- 354
  9. Mustardé JC. Reconstruction of eyelids. Ann Plast Surg 1983; 11: 149-169
  10. Barba-Gómez J, Zuñiga-Mendoza O, Iñiguez-Briseño I, Sánchez-Tadeo MT, Barba-Gómez JF, Molina-Frechero N, Bologna-Molina R. Total lower-eyelid reconstruction: modified Fricke’s cheek flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1430-1435
  11. Hofer SO, Mureau MA. Pedicled perforator flaps in the head and neck. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37: 627-640
  12. Rong L, Lin Q, Zhang D, Peng WH. Repair of alar defects using a nasolabial flap and a partial-thickness cartilage complex graft. Dermatol Surg 2015; 41: 655-657
  13. Yoon TH, Yun IS, Rha DK, Lee WJ. Reconstruction of various perinasal defects using facial artery perforator-based nasolabial island flaps. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40: 754-760
  14. Shipkov H, Stefanova P, Pazardzhikliev D, Djambazov K. Superiorly based nasolabial island flap: indications and advantages in upper lip reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 1928-1929
  15. Seo YJ, Hwang C, Choi S, Oh SH. Midface reconstruction with various flaps based on the angular artery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1226-1233
  16. Tei TM, Larsen J. Use of the subcutaneously based nasolabial flap in lower eyelid reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 420-423
  17. Vayvada H, Menderes A, Tan Ö, Yılmaz M. Total lower eyelid reconstruction using paranasal flap. J Craniofac Su