Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

The comparison of various disinfectants? efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm layers

Pages
1287–1294
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We concluded that if we use sodium hypochlorite at a high level as a disinfectant for both surfaces and medical equipment, it is beneficial to prevent infections related to biofilms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Because biofilms are resistant to antibiotics and biocides, they usually cause chronic persistent infections, which are arduous to cure and have high mortality and morbidity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, sodium hypochlorite showed the most influential disinfection because it diminished 83.6% of the biofilm layer and decreased 99.7% of live microbial cells.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We concluded that if we use sodium hypochlorite at a high level as a disinfectant for both surfaces and medical equipment, it is beneficial to prevent infections related to biofilms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Because biofilms are resistant to antibiotics and biocides, they usually cause chronic persistent infections, which are arduous to cure and have high mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate the efficiency of orthophthalaldehyde, peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and sodium hypochlorite on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm layers and live microbial cells. Materials and methods: Biofilm layers were determined by crystal violet assay and live microbial cells were determined using a resazurin assay. Results: For Pseudomonas aeruginosa, sodium hypochlorite showed the most influential disinfection because it diminished 83.6% of the biofilm layer and decreased 99.7% of live microbial cells. For Staphylococcus aureus, hydrogen peroxide was determined the most active disinfectant with 80.3% reduction of the biofilm layer. Sodium hypochlorite was also determined to be the most efficient disinfectant with 99.8% reduction of live microbial cells. Sodium hypochlorite was the most influential disinfectant on biofilm layers and live microbial cells of both microorganisms. Conclusion: We concluded that if we use sodium hypochlorite at a high level as a disinfectant for both surfaces and medical equipment, it is beneficial to prevent infections related to biofilms. More studies about prevention of biofilm occurrence and standardization of the methods for investigating disinfectants effects are necessary.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖSE, H., YAPAR, N. (2022). The comparison of various disinfectants? efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm layers. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 1287–1294. https://ajindex.com/articles/610380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. Pathogenesis of mucosal biofilm infections: challenges and progress. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2008; 6: 201-208
  2. Jones CJ, Newsom D, Kelly B, Irie Y, Jennings LK, Xu B, Limoli DH, Harrison JJ, Parsek MR, White P et al. ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq reveal an AmrZ mediated mechanism for cyclic di-GMP synthesis and biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10: e1003984
  3. Balaban N, Cirioni O, Giacometti A, Ghiselli R, Braunstein JB, Silvesti C, Mocchegiani F, Saba V, Scalise G. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection by the quorum-sensing inhibitor RIP. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 2226- 2229
  4. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15: 167-193
  5. Tote K, Horemans T, Vanden Berghe D, Maes L, Cos P. Inhibitory effect of biocides on the viable masses and matrices of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010; 76: 3135-3142
  6. Tashiro Y, Inagaki A, Ono K, Inaba T, Yawata Y, Uchiyama H, Nomura R. Low concentrations of ethanol stimulate biofilm and pellicle formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2014; 78: 178-181
  7. Walsh SE, Maillard JY, Russell AD. Orthophthalaldehyde: a possible alternative to glutaraldehyde for high level disinfection. J Appl Microbiol 1999; 86: 1039-1046
  8. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukic S, Cirkovic I, Ruzicka F. Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 2007; 115: 891-899
  9. Lewis K. Persister cells, dormancy and infectious disease. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5: 48-56
  10. Smith K, Hunter IS. Efficacy of common hospital biocides with biofilms of multi-drug resistant clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57: 966-973
  11. Fraise AP. European norms for disinfection testing. J Hosp Infect 2008; 70: 8-10
  12. FDA. Cleared Sterilants and High Level Disinfectants with General Claims for Processing Reusable Medical and Dental Devices. Silver Spring, MD, USA: FDA; 2015
  13. Rutela WA, Weber DJ. Disinfection, sterilization, and control of hospital waste. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. pp. 3294-3309
  14. Tote K, Vanden Berghe DV