SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Studies - Language and Literature / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

Dimensions Of The Debate On The Eloquence Of Persuasion İn Ibn Wahb's (D. 335) Book "Al- Burhan Fî Vucuh Al-Beyan"

Mahmud KADDUM
Mohamed Yazid SALEM
Pages
2531–2542
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, we try to stand on the deliberative aspects of his rhetoric of persuasion through his book “The Proof in the Faces of the Statement”.Persuasion is an important means of communication, its aims and purposes, and since Arabic rhetoric came to communicate; Persuasion is one of the most important functions for which it was established; Because it is one of the two sides of the relationship between a message aimed at directing thought or belief, and its second party is conviction, and these two parties are intertwined with existence and non-existence, so there is no conviction - absolutely - without the presence of persuasion.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Argumentation has become the most effective approach to analyzing texts, given the flexibility it is characterized by, its openness to the most rhetorical forms, and its benefit from contemporary pragmatics, which presented it in a new image as a subject and method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pilgrims are ancient and deeply rooted in the history of the Western and Arab civilizations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, we try to stand on the deliberative aspects of his rhetoric of persuasion through his book “The Proof in the Faces of the Statement”.Persuasion is an important means of communication, its aims and purposes, and since Arabic rhetoric came to communicate; Persuasion is one of the most important functions for which it was established; Because it is one of the two sides of the relationship between a message aimed at directing thought or belief, and its second party is conviction, and these two parties are intertwined with existence and non-existence, so there is no conviction - absolutely - without the presence of persuasion.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Argumentation has become the most effective approach to analyzing texts, given the flexibility it is characterized by, its openness to the most rhetorical forms, and its benefit from contemporary pragmatics, which presented it in a new image as a subject and method. The pilgrims are ancient and deeply rooted in the history of the Western and Arab civilizations. The latter was characterized by the art of rhetoric, which was drawn from two important currents, the first: my aesthetic pleasure, and the second: persuading my argumentation. Many Arab scholars and critics agree on the prominent role played by the scholar "Ibn Wahb" in the service of the second current, as he is considered an eminently man of pilgrims and debaters, and a speaker who is well-versed in speech and persuasion. In this article, we try to stand on the deliberative aspects of his rhetoric of persuasion through his book “The Proof in the Faces of the Statement”.Persuasion is an important means of communication, its aims and purposes, and since Arabic rhetoric came to communicate; Persuasion is one of the most important functions for which it was established; Because it is one of the two sides of the relationship between a message aimed at directing thought or belief, and its second party is conviction, and these two parties are intertwined with existence and non-existence, so there is no conviction - absolutely - without the presence of persuasion.

🔖

Cite This Article

KADDUM, M., SALEM, M. Y. (2022). Dimensions Of The Debate On The Eloquence Of Persuasion İn Ibn Wahb's (D. 335) Book "Al- Burhan Fî Vucuh Al-Beyan". Turkish Studies - Language and Literature, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 2531–2542. https://ajindex.com/articles/610369

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ezâyyid, B. (2010). el-badü’t-tedâvuli fi’l-hicâci’l-lisânî, (1. baskı), Âlem’ül-Kütübü’l-Hadîs. Belanger, L. (2010). Iddet’ül-edavât’ül-icrâiyye, (1. baskı), Tercüme: Kutal Fazliyye, Âlem’ül- Kütübü’l-Hadîs. Bucâdî, H. (2009). fi’l-lisâniyyât’it-tedâviliyye, (1. baskı), Beyt’ül-Hikmeti li’n-Neşir, ve’t-Tevzî’. Cevher, M.(2020) Kur’an’a göre Musa (a.s)kıssasında stratejik planlama, Diyanet Arapça İlmi Dergi, SAYI:2,S, 88 El-Câhız, A. (1998). el-beyân ve’t-tebyîn, Tahkîk: Abdüsselâm Muhammed Harun, (7. baskı), Mektebet’ül-Hancı. Hâkim, A. (2015). el-Hitâb’ül-iknâî fi dav’it-tevâsul’il-luğavi, (1. baskı), Dâr’ul-Asmâi. el-Haşşâb, A. (1974). el-medhal’üs-susyûlûcî lil-ilâm, Baskısız, Dâr’ül-Kütüb’ül-Câmiiyye. Rakîk, E. (2014). Belâğat’ül-hitâb’ül-mektûbi, Doktora tezi, Câmiatü Muhammed Hızır Bisekeratün. Rîfî, H. el-Haccâcü inde aristû, Külliyet’ül-Âdâb. eş-Şehrî, A. (2004). İstirâtîciyyâtül-hitâb: mükâr betü lüğaviyye ve tedâvüliyye, (1. baskı), Dâr’ül- Kitâb’ül-Cedîd’ül-Müttehıdetü. Samûd, H. (1981). et-Tefkîr’ul-belâğî inde’l-Arab, Külliyet’ül-Âdâb. Sûle, A. el-Hicâcü utruhû ve muntalikâtihû ve tekniyyâtuhû, Külliyet’ül-Âdâb. Tales, A. (1986). Fen’nül-hitâbe, (2. baskı), tercüme: Abdurrahman Bedevî, Dâr’uş-Şuûn’ussekâfiyye’tül- Âmme. Taha, A. (2007). fî Usûl’il-hivâr ve tecdîd ılm’ül-kelâm, (3. baskı), el-Merkez’üs-Sekâfiyyi’l-Arabî. Âdil, A. (2013). Belâğat’ül-iknâ fi’l-münâzara, (1. baskı), Münşerivât Dıfâf. El-Abd, M. (2002). en-Nass’ül-hicâciyyü’l-Arabî, Dirâsetü fî Vesâil’il-İknâ, mecelletü füsûlü li’nnakti’l- Arabî, el-hey’et’ül-Mısriyye’tül-âmme lil-kitâbi, 60. Sayı, 42-86. el-Abd, M. (2005). en-Nass’ül-hicâciyyü’l-Arabî, mecelletü cüzûr, en-Nâdîyyü’l-Edebiyy, 238- 249. el-Abd, M. (2010). en-Nass’ül-hicâciyyü’l-Arabî: Dirâsetü fî vesâil’il-iknâ, Âlem’ül-Kütüb’ül- Hadîs. el-Azzâvî, B. (2006). el-Lüğatü ve’l-hicâc, 1. Baskı, ed-Dâr’ul-Beyzâ, el-Mağrib. Alevî, H. (2010). el-Lisâniyyâtü v’el-hicâcü’l-müğâlit: nahve mukârabe lisâniyye vazîfiyye, Âlem’ül-Kütüb’ül-Hadîs. Kâdâ, A. (2016). Belâğat’ül-iknâ: dirâsetü nazariyyetü ve tatbîkiyyetü, (1. baskı), Dâru Kunûz el- Marifetü li’n-Neşr ve’t-Tevzî’. Miftâh, M. (2001). et-Telkî v’et-te’vîl, 2. Baskı, el-Merkez’üs-Sekâfiyyi’l-Arabî. Misbâh, Â. el-İknâ’ül-ictimâî: en-nazariyyetü ve âliyyâtüh’ul-ımliyyetü, Divan elmatbü’ât. Mukaddes, F. (2017). el-Hicâc’ül- et-tedâvulî sûratuh’ul-münâzarat’ül-İslâmiyyeti: kırâetü fî usûl’il-hıvâr ve tecdîd ilm’ül-kelâmi li’d-doktor taha abdurrahman, Mecellet’ül-Müdûneti, Mahba