Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and iliococcygeus fixation procedures

Pages
602–610
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the overall complication rate of each group did not differ significantly (P = 0.332).Conclusion: Overall, complication rates and short-term outcomes for the abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgical procedureswere not statistically significantly different.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to investigate differences in perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of patientswho underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy, sacrospinous ligamentfixation (SSLF), and iliococcygeus fixation due to apical prolapse.Materials and methods: The present retrospective cohort study included 145 patients who underwent apical prolapse surgeryperformed by the same surgeons between 1/1/2011 and 30/6/2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were 68 abdominal sacrocolpopexies (44 sacrocolpopexies and24 sacrohysteropexies), 13 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies (10 sacrocolpopexies and 3 sacrohysteropexies), 57 SSLFs, and 7 iliococcygeusfixations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the overall complication rate of each group did not differ significantly (P = 0.332).Conclusion: Overall, complication rates and short-term outcomes for the abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgical procedureswere not statistically significantly different.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to investigate differences in perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of patientswho underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy, sacrospinous ligamentfixation (SSLF), and iliococcygeus fixation due to apical prolapse.Materials and methods: The present retrospective cohort study included 145 patients who underwent apical prolapse surgeryperformed by the same surgeons between 1/1/2011 and 30/6/2017. There were 68 abdominal sacrocolpopexies (44 sacrocolpopexies and24 sacrohysteropexies), 13 laparoscopic sacrocolpopexies (10 sacrocolpopexies and 3 sacrohysteropexies), 57 SSLFs, and 7 iliococcygeusfixations. Patients’ short-term outcomes, perioperative complications, blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay were analyzed.Results: The mean operating time in the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy group was 179.6 min versus 122.8, 117.3, and 107.1 min in theSSLF, abdominal sacrocolpopexy, and iliococcygeus fixation groups, respectively (P < 0.01). The hospital stay was significantly shorter inthe iliococcygeus fixation group (1.86 days) when compared with that of other groups (P < 0.01). During a 6-month follow-up period,no prolapse recurrence or mesh exposure was observed in any groups. Wound complications were more frequent in the abdominalsacrocolpopexy group. However, the overall complication rate of each group did not differ significantly (P = 0.332).Conclusion: Overall, complication rates and short-term outcomes for the abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgical procedureswere not statistically significantly different. However, minimally invasive approaches were associated with reduced procedural-relatedmorbidity.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENDAĞ, F., HORTU, İ., ÖZEREN, M., TOSUN, G., ERTAŞ, İ. E., DEMİR, A., TANER, C. E., BİLER, A. (2022). Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and iliococcygeus fixation procedures. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 602–610. https://ajindex.com/articles/610350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 646-651. [No authors listed.] Risk factors for genital prolapse in nonhysterectomized women around menopause. Results from a large cross-sectional study in menopausal clinics in Italy. Progetto Menopausa Italia Study Group. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 93: 135-140.
  2. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, Spino C, Whitehead WE, Wu J, Brody DJ et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300: 1311-1316.
  3. Barbalat Y, Tunuguntla HS. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: a historical perspective. Curr Urology Rep 2012; 13: 256-261.
  4. Randall CL, Nichols DH. Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol 1971; 38: 327-332. Cruikshank SH. Sacrospinous fixation--should this be performed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1072-1076.
  5. Porges RF, Smilen SW. Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 1518-1528.
  6. Beer M, Kuhn A. Surgical techniques for vault prolapse: a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 119: 144-155.
  7. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, Zyczynski H; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 805-823.
  8. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 10: CD012376. McDermott CD, Hale DS. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 585-614.
  9. Costantini E, Mearini L, Lazzeri M, Bini V, Nunzi E, di Biase M, Porena M. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2016; 196: 159-165.
  10. Sarlos D, Kots L, Ryu G, Schaer G. Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25: 1207- 1212. Demirci F, Ozdemir I, Somunkiran A, Topuz S, Iyibozkurt C, Duras Doyran G, Kemik Gul O, Gul B. Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18: 257-261. Coolen AL, van Oudheusden AM, van Eijndhoven HW, van der Heijden TP, Stokmans RA, Mol BW, Bongers MY. A Comparison of complications between open abdomin