Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

In vitro susceptibility of seven antifungal agents against dermatophytes isolated in İstanbul

Pages
615–619
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Inthis study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of seven antifungal agents: amphotericin B, terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole,ketoconazole, miconazole, and fluconazole.Materials and methods: A sensitivity study was performed using a microdilution method in accordance with the CLSI M38-A2standards using isolates of Trichophyton rubrum (n = 55), Microsporum canis (n = 9), and Trichophyton interdigitale (n = 2), which wereidentified by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA.Results: According to the results of antifungal sensitivity tests, the geometric mean (GM) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)against T. rubrum was 0.10 μg/mL for ketoconazole, 0.20 μg/mL for itraconazole, 0.07 μg/mL for miconazole, 0.48 μg/mL for fluconazole,2.27 μg/mL for amphotericin B, 0.06 μg/mL for voriconazole, and 0.06 μg/mL for terbinafine.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Dermatophytes are the causative agents of dermatophytosis, which is a common disease worldwide that affects thehair, skin, and nails.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Dermatophytes comprise more than 40 species in 3 genera: Microsporum, Trichophyton, and Epidermaphyton.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Inthis study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of seven antifungal agents: amphotericin B, terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole,ketoconazole, miconazole, and fluconazole.Materials and methods: A sensitivity study was performed using a microdilution method in accordance with the CLSI M38-A2standards using isolates of Trichophyton rubrum (n = 55), Microsporum canis (n = 9), and Trichophyton interdigitale (n = 2), which wereidentified by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA.Results: According to the results of antifungal sensitivity tests, the geometric mean (GM) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)against T. rubrum was 0.10 μg/mL for ketoconazole, 0.20 μg/mL for itraconazole, 0.07 μg/mL for miconazole, 0.48 μg/mL for fluconazole,2.27 μg/mL for amphotericin B, 0.06 μg/mL for voriconazole, and 0.06 μg/mL for terbinafine.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Dermatophytes are the causative agents of dermatophytosis, which is a common disease worldwide that affects thehair, skin, and nails. Dermatophytes comprise more than 40 species in 3 genera: Microsporum, Trichophyton, and Epidermaphyton. Inthis study, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of seven antifungal agents: amphotericin B, terbinafine, itraconazole, voriconazole,ketoconazole, miconazole, and fluconazole.Materials and methods: A sensitivity study was performed using a microdilution method in accordance with the CLSI M38-A2standards using isolates of Trichophyton rubrum (n = 55), Microsporum canis (n = 9), and Trichophyton interdigitale (n = 2), which wereidentified by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer region of the rDNA.Results: According to the results of antifungal sensitivity tests, the geometric mean (GM) minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)against T. rubrum was 0.10 μg/mL for ketoconazole, 0.20 μg/mL for itraconazole, 0.07 μg/mL for miconazole, 0.48 μg/mL for fluconazole,2.27 μg/mL for amphotericin B, 0.06 μg/mL for voriconazole, and 0.06 μg/mL for terbinafine.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARIŞ, A., ŞEN, S., ÖZAKKAŞ, F., ALTINBAŞ, R., TURAN, D. (2022). In vitro susceptibility of seven antifungal agents against dermatophytes isolated in İstanbul. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 615–619. https://ajindex.com/articles/610302

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Reiss E, Shadomy HJ, Lyon GM. Fundamental Medical Mycology. 1st ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012, pp. 527-565.
  2. Nenoff P, Kruger C, Ginter-Hanselmayer G, Tietz HJ. Mycology - an update. Part 1: Dermatomycoses: causative agents, epidemiology and pathogenesis. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 12: 188-209; quiz 210, 188-211; quiz 212. Ilkit M, Durdu M. Tinea pedis: the etiology and global epidemiology of a common fungal infection. Crit Rev Microbiol 2015; 41: 374-388.
  3. Zalacain A, Obrador C, Martinez JP, Vinas M, Vinuesa T. Characterization of the antimicrobial susceptibility of fungi responsible for onychomycosis in Spain. Med Mycol 2011; 49: 495-499.
  4. Jo Siu WJ, Tatsumi Y, Senda H, Pillai R, Nakamura T, Sone D, Fothergillc A. Comparison of in vitro antifungal activities of efinaconazole and currently available antifungal agents against a variety of pathogenic fungi associated with onychomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013; 57: 1610-1616.
  5. Sarifakioglu E, Seckin D, Demirbilek M, Can F. In vitro antifungal susceptibility patterns of dermatophyte strains causing tinea unguium. Clin Exp Dermatol 2007; 32: 675-679.
  6. Bıyık F, Gräser Y, Susever S, Özarmağan G, Yeğenoğlu Y. Dermatofitlerin identifikasyonunda moleküler yöntemlerin yeri ve uygulanabilirliğinin belirlenmesi TURKDERM 2013; 41: 26-32 (in Turkish). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. M38-A2: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Approved standard M38-A. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 2000. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi. Proposed Standard; document no. M38-P. Wayne, PA, USA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1998.
  7. Ansari S, Hedayati MT, Zomorodian K, Pakshir K, Badali H, Rafiei A, Ravandeh M, Seyedmousavi S. Molecular characterization and in vitro antifungal susceptibility of 316 clinical isolates of dermatophytes in Iran. Mycopathologia 2016; 181: 89-95.
  8. Badali H, Mohammadi R, Mashedi O, de Hoog GS, Meis JF. In vitro susceptibility patterns of clinically important Trichophyton and Epidermophyton species against nine antifungal drugs. Mycoses 2015; 58: 303-307.
  9. Baghi N, Shokohi T, Badali H, Abastabar M. In vitro activity of new azoles luliconazole and lanoconazole