Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

The role of multislice computerized tomography angiography in assessing postoperative vascular complications in liver transplant patients

Pages
1212–1220
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms (n = 4) and various stenoses (n = 4), infrarenal aortic anastomosis (n = 4), vena cava inferior thrombosis (n = 1), arteriovenousmalformation (n = 1), and esophageal varices (n = 1).Conclusion: MSCTA detected more lesions and we believe that it should be considered as a road map for Doppler US follow-ups as wellas a routine screening modality for early detection of vascular complications in symptomatic and asymptomatic liver transplantationpatients that may be missed by Doppler US.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Vascular complications can be detected in liver transplant patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Digital subtraction angiography has served asthe gold standard to make this diagnosis; however, due to its invasive nature, ultrasonography is used for the preliminary evaluation.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of multislice computerized tomography angiography (MSCTA) in the detection ofvascular complications of symptomatic and asymptomatic liver transplant patients and to compare the results with Doppler ultrasound(Doppler US) findings.Materials and methods: Fifty-three liver transplant patients (6 symptomatic, 47 asymptomatic) underwent Doppler US examinationfollowed by an MSCTA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms (n = 4) and various stenoses (n = 4), infrarenal aortic anastomosis (n = 4), vena cava inferior thrombosis (n = 1), arteriovenousmalformation (n = 1), and esophageal varices (n = 1).Conclusion: MSCTA detected more lesions and we believe that it should be considered as a road map for Doppler US follow-ups as wellas a routine screening modality for early detection of vascular complications in symptomatic and asymptomatic liver transplantationpatients that may be missed by Doppler US.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Vascular complications can be detected in liver transplant patients. Digital subtraction angiography has served asthe gold standard to make this diagnosis; however, due to its invasive nature, ultrasonography is used for the preliminary evaluation.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of multislice computerized tomography angiography (MSCTA) in the detection ofvascular complications of symptomatic and asymptomatic liver transplant patients and to compare the results with Doppler ultrasound(Doppler US) findings.Materials and methods: Fifty-three liver transplant patients (6 symptomatic, 47 asymptomatic) underwent Doppler US examinationfollowed by an MSCTA. The findings in each modality were interpreted in a blinded fashion and then compared.Results: MSCTA detected 15 abnormalities, none of which were detected by Doppler US. There were hepatic and splenic artery aneurysms (n = 4) and various stenoses (n = 4), infrarenal aortic anastomosis (n = 4), vena cava inferior thrombosis (n = 1), arteriovenousmalformation (n = 1), and esophageal varices (n = 1).Conclusion: MSCTA detected more lesions and we believe that it should be considered as a road map for Doppler US follow-ups as wellas a routine screening modality for early detection of vascular complications in symptomatic and asymptomatic liver transplantationpatients that may be missed by Doppler US.

🔖

Cite This Article

SALMASLIOĞLU, A., TÜRK, Y., SASANİ, H. (2022). The role of multislice computerized tomography angiography in assessing postoperative vascular complications in liver transplant patients. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 1212–1220. https://ajindex.com/articles/610257

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Vonkaulla KN, Hermann G, Brittain RS et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 1963; 117: 659-676
  2. Mazariegos GV, Molmenti EP, Kramer DJ. Early complications after orthotopic liver transplantation. Surgical Clinics of North America 1999; 79 (1): 109-129
  3. Nghiem HV, Tran K, Winter TC 3rd, Schmiedl UP, Althaus SJ et al. Imaging of complications in liver transplantation. Radiographics 1996; 16 (4): 825-840
  4. Zeytunlu M, Uguz A, Unalp O, Ergun O, Karasu Z et al. Results of 1001 liver transplantations in 23 years: Ege University experience. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 2018; 29 (6): 664-668. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2018.18058 5. Dogan S, Gurakar A. Liver transplantation update: 2014. Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology 2015; 5 (2): 98- 106. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1144 6. Platt JF, Yutzy GG, Bude RO, Ellis JH, Rubin JM. Use of Doppler sonography for revealing hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients. American Journal of Roentgenology 1997; 168 (2): 473-476
  5. Defrancq J, Trotteur G, Dondelinger RF. Duplex ultrasonographic evaluation of liver transplants. Acta Radiologica 1993; 34 (5): 478-481
  6. Caiado AHM, Blasbalg R, Marcelino ASZ, Pinho MC, Chammas MC et al. Complications of liver transplantation: multimodality imaging approach. RadioGraphics 2007; 27 (5): 1401- 1417
  7. Corriveau MM, Johnston KW. Interobserver variability of carotid Doppler peak velocity measurements among technologists in an ICAVL-accredited vascular laboratory. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2004; 39 (4): 735-741
  8. Sabbà C, Merkel C, Zoli M, Ferraioli G, Gaiani S et al. Interobserver and interequipment variability of echo-Doppler examination of the portal vein: effect of a cooperative training program. Hepatology 1995; 21 (2): 428-433
  9. Hom BK, Shrestha R, Palmer SL, Katz MD, Selby RR et al. Prospective evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation: comparison of conventional and microbubble contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 2006; 241 (1): 267-274
  10. Hall TR, McDiarmid SV, Grant EG, Boechat MI, Busuttil RW. False-negative duplex Doppler studies in children with hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation. American Journal of Roentgenology 1990; 154 (3): 573-575
  11. Stell D, Downey D, Marotta P, Solano E, Khakhar A et al. Prospective evaluation of the role of quantitative Doppler ultrasound surveillance in liver transplantation. Liver Transplant