Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

The effectiveness of RENAL nephrometry score in ablated renal tumors via radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation

Pages
761–768
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RENAL nephrometryscoring is a valuable system for standardizing renal tumors and evaluating the success of ablative therapies, possible complications, andoncological results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryotherapy and to scrutinizethe therapeutic success of the RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior, and location)nephrometry score in terms of possible complications and the predictive status of oncological results.Materials and methods: Forty-five patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (32 males, 13 females) treated with RFA andcryotherapy were included.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were 22–90 years old (average: 59.2 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RENAL nephrometryscoring is a valuable system for standardizing renal tumors and evaluating the success of ablative therapies, possible complications, andoncological results.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryotherapy and to scrutinizethe therapeutic success of the RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system, anterior/posterior, and location)nephrometry score in terms of possible complications and the predictive status of oncological results.Materials and methods: Forty-five patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinomas (32 males, 13 females) treated with RFA andcryotherapy were included. Patients were 22–90 years old (average: 59.2 years). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS forWindows.Results: A total of 79 lesions with dimensions varying between 0.9 and 4.5 cm (average: 2.2 cm) were ablated. Complete ablationwas achieved for 72 (91.1%) lesions. Six repeat RFA sessions were applied for 4 (5%) lesions with residue/recurrence. The averageRENAL nephrometry scores of lesions that underwent complete ablation and those that developed residue/recurrence were 6.3 and 7.7,respectively. The average recurrence-free survival time was 34.8 months (range: 3–55 months), while it was 44.6 months (range: 6–55months) for cryotherapy and 28.6 months (range: 3–50 months) for RFA.Conclusions: Ablative therapies are minimally invasive and effective methods for treating small renal tumors. RENAL nephrometryscoring is a valuable system for standardizing renal tumors and evaluating the success of ablative therapies, possible complications, andoncological results.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTAR, S. Ö., KURT, S. A., YÜCEL, C., ERBAŞ, G., SÖZEN, S., ÖNER, A. Y. (2022). The effectiveness of RENAL nephrometry score in ablated renal tumors via radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 761–768. https://ajindex.com/articles/610243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006; 98 (18): 1331-1334
  2. Pavlovich CP, Walther MM, Choyke PL, Pautler SE, Chang R et al. Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: initial results. Journal of Urology 2002; 167 (1): 10-15
  3. Allen BC, Remer EM. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: patient selection, technique, and postprocedural imaging. Radiographics 2010; 30 (4): 887-900
  4. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, Brace CL. Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation—what should you use and why? Radiographics 2014; 34 (5): 1344-1362
  5. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. Thermal ablation therapy for focal malignancy: a unified approach to underlying principles, techniques, and diagnostic imaging guidance. American Journal of Roentgenology 2000; 174 (2): 323-331
  6. Sackenheim MM. Radio frequency ablation: the key to cancer treatment. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 2003; 19 (2): 88-92
  7. Weber SM, Lee FT. Cryoablation: History, mechanism of action, and guidance modalities. In: van Sonnenberg E, McMullen WN, Solbiati L, Livraghi T, Müeller PR et al. (editors). Tumor Ablation. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2005. pp. 250-265
  8. Reyes J, Canter D, Putnam S, Simhan J, Smaldone MC et al. Thermal ablation of the small renal mass: case selection using the RENAL-Nephrometry Score. Urologic Oncology 2013; 31 (7): 1292-1297
  9. Higgins LJ, Hong K. Renal ablation techniques: state of the art. American Journal of Roentgenology 2015; 205 (4): 735-741
  10. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The RENAL nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. Journal of Urology 2009; 182 (3): 844-853
  11. Sisul DM, Liss MA, Palazzi KL, Briles K, Mehrazin R et al. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with complications after renal cryoablation: a multicenter analysis. Urology 2013; 81 (4): 775-780
  12. Chang X, Ji C, Zhao X, Zhang F, Lian H et al. The application of RENAL nephrometry scoring system in predicting the complications after laparoscopic renal radiofrequency ablation. Journal of Endourology 2014; 28 (4): 424-429
  13. Clark TW, Millward SF, Gervais DA, Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ et al. Reporting standards for percutaneous thermal ablation of renal cell carcinoma. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Ra