Background/aim: In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the five most commonly used antiseptic formulations wereevaluated in terms of different contact times and organic conditions.Materials and methods: Solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, and tincture ofiodine were prepared and tested according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624 with different parameters.Results: The results showed that isopropyl alcohol (70% v/v) and tincture of iodine (2%) had greater bactericidal and fungicidal activityagainst the four tested bacteria and two fungi in all conditions.Conclusion: When the results of the five different active substances were quantitatively evaluated regarding their bactericidal and fungicidal activities, it was found that contact time and organic load significantly affected the antiseptic efficacy.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the five most commonly used antiseptic formulations wereevaluated in terms of different contact times and organic conditions.Materials and methods: Solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, and tincture ofiodine were prepared and tested according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624 with different parameters.Results: The results showed that isopropyl alcohol (70% v/v) and tincture of iodine (2%) had greater bactericidal and fungicidal activityagainst the four tested bacteria and two fungi in all conditions.Conclusion: When the results of the five different active substances were quantitatively evaluated regarding their bactericidal and fungicidal activities, it was found that contact time and organic load significantly affected the antiseptic efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Background/aim: In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the five most commonly used antiseptic formulations wereevaluated in terms of different contact times and organic conditions.Materials and methods: Solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, and tincture ofiodine were prepared and tested according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624 with different parameters.Results: The results showed that isopropyl alcohol (70% v/v) and tincture of iodine (2%) had greater bactericidal and fungicidal activityagainst the four tested bacteria and two fungi in all conditions.Conclusion: When the results of the five different active substances were quantitatively evaluated regarding their bactericidal and fungicidal activities, it was found that contact time and organic load significantly affected the antiseptic efficacy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Background/aim: In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the five most commonly used antiseptic formulations wereevaluated in terms of different contact times and organic conditions.Materials and methods: Solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, and tincture ofiodine were prepared and tested according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624 with different parameters.Results: The results showed that isopropyl alcohol (70% v/v) and tincture of iodine (2%) had greater bactericidal and fungicidal activityagainst the four tested bacteria and two fungi in all conditions.Conclusion: When the results of the five different active substances were quantitatively evaluated regarding their bactericidal and fungicidal activities, it was found that contact time and organic load significantly affected the antiseptic efficacy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Background/aim: In this study, the antibacterial and antifungal properties of the five most commonly used antiseptic formulations wereevaluated in terms of different contact times and organic conditions.Materials and methods: Solutions of chlorhexidine digluconate, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, hydrogen peroxide, and tincture ofiodine were prepared and tested according to European standards EN 13727 and EN 13624 with different parameters.Results: The results showed that isopropyl alcohol (70% v/v) and tincture of iodine (2%) had greater bactericidal and fungicidal activityagainst the four tested bacteria and two fungi in all conditions.Conclusion: When the results of the five different active substances were quantitatively evaluated regarding their bactericidal and fungicidal activities, it was found that contact time and organic load significantly affected the antiseptic efficacy.
🔖
Cite This Article
ŞAHİNER, A., HALAT, E., YAPAR, E. A. (2022). Comparison of bactericidal and fungicidal efficacy of antiseptic formulations according to EN 13727 and EN 13624 standards. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 1564–1567. https://ajindex.com/articles/610239
Salvatico S, Feuillolay C, Mas Y, Verrière F, Roques C. Bactericidal activity of 3 cutaneous/mucosal antiseptic solutions in the presence of interfering substances: improvement of the NF EN 13727 European Standard? Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses 2015; 45 (3): 89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.01.006 2. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 1999; 12 (1): 147-179. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.1.147. 3. European Committee for Standardization. EN 13727:2015. Chemical disinfectants. Quantitative suspension test for the Evaluation of Bactericidal Activity for Instruments Used in the Medical Area. Test Method and Requirements (Phase 2/Step 1). Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization; 2015. 4. European Committee for Standardization. EN 13624:2013. Chemical Disinfectants and Antiseptics - Quantitative Suspension Test for the Evaluation of Fungicidal Activity of Chemical Disinfectants for Instruments Used in the Medical Area - Test Method and Requirements (Phase 2, Step 1). Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization; 2013. 5. Maillard JY, Messager S, Veillon R. Antimicrobial efficacy of biocides tested on skin using an ex-vivo test. Journal of Hospital Infection 1998; 40 (4): 313-323. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-50-3- 284 6. Russell AD, Day MJ. Antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine. Journal of Hospital Infection 1993; 25 (4): 229-238. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(93)90109-d 7. Dopcea G, Matei F. Review on some current skin antiseptics. In: Cornea CP, Jurcoane Ş (editors). Scientific Bulletin. 12th Vol. Bucharest, Romania: CERES Publishing House; 2018. pp. 147-158.