Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6

Patient symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in temporomandibular joint internal derangement

Pages
1092–1095
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean VAS levels were compared between these two groups.Results: There were no significant differences between the MRI(+) and MRI(-) groups and no differences between the reduced discdislocation group and nonreduced disc dislocation group.Conclusion: Although pain is maybe the most irritating symptom for TMJ patients, it cannot take the diagnostic place of MRI and MRIis still the gold standard method to make the exact diagnose of internal derangement.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements consist of reduced and nonreduced disc dislocations andare often diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were separated into two main groups as MRI(+) and MRI(-) groups according totheir internal derangement findings in MRI.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean VAS levels were compared between these two groups.Results: There were no significant differences between the MRI(+) and MRI(-) groups and no differences between the reduced discdislocation group and nonreduced disc dislocation group.Conclusion: Although pain is maybe the most irritating symptom for TMJ patients, it cannot take the diagnostic place of MRI and MRIis still the gold standard method to make the exact diagnose of internal derangement.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements consist of reduced and nonreduced disc dislocations andare often diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main symptom of these derangements is TMJ pain. This study aimed toevaluate whether there is a correlation between TMJ pain and disc dislocation.Materials and methods: One hundred and four patients experiencing pain were evaluated retrospectively with the examination chartsthat we use routinely in our clinics and MRI. Patients were separated into two main groups as MRI(+) and MRI(-) groups according totheir internal derangement findings in MRI. Mean VAS levels were compared between these two groups.Results: There were no significant differences between the MRI(+) and MRI(-) groups and no differences between the reduced discdislocation group and nonreduced disc dislocation group.Conclusion: Although pain is maybe the most irritating symptom for TMJ patients, it cannot take the diagnostic place of MRI and MRIis still the gold standard method to make the exact diagnose of internal derangement.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDAĞ, O., YILDIRAN, G., KARAMEŞE, M. (2022). Patient symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging correlation in temporomandibular joint internal derangement. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6, 1092–1095. https://ajindex.com/articles/610177

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Rudisch A, Innerhofer K, Bertram S, Emshoff R. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of internal derangement and effusion in patients with unilateral temporomandibular joint pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 566-571. de Melo DP, Sousa Melo SL, de Andrade Freitas Oliveira LS, Ramos-Perez FM, Campos PS. Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disk displacement and its correlation with pain and osseous abnormalities in symptomatic young patients with magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015; 119: 107-112.
  2. Emodi-Perlman A, Yoffe T, Rosenberg N, Eli I, Alter Z, Winocur E. Prevalence of psychologic, dental, and temporomandibular signs and symptoms among chronic eating disorders patients: a comparative control study. J Orofac Pain 2008; 22: 201-208.
  3. Tasaki MM, Westesson PL, Raubertas RF. Observer variation in interpretation of magnetic resonance images of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 231-234.
  4. Ryalat S, Baqain ZH, Amin WM, Sawair F, Samara O, Badran DH. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders among students of the University of Jordan. J Clin Med Res 2009; 1: 158-164.
  5. Chantaracherd P, John MT, Hodges JS, Schiffman EL. Temporomandibular joint disorders’ impact on pain, function, and disability. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 79-86.
  6. Vieira-Queiroz I, Gomes Torres MG, de Oliveira-Santos C, Flores Campos PS, Crusoé-Rebello IM. Biometric parameters of the temporomandibular joint and association with disc displacement and pain: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 42: 765-770.
  7. Murakami K, Nishida M, Bessho K, Iizuka T, Tsuda Y, Konishi J. MRI evidence of high signal intensity and temporomandibular arthralgia and relating pain. Does the high signal correlate to the pain? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996; 34: 220-224.
  8. Warren MP, Fried JL. Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs 2001; 169: 187-192.
  9. Wu YW, Bi YP, Kou XX, Xu W, Ma LQ, Wang KW, Gan YH, Ma XC. 17-Beta-estradiol enhanced allodynia of inflammatory temporomandibular joint through upregulation of hippocampal TRPV1 in ovariectomized rats. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 8710-8719.
  10. Fujiwara M, Honda K, Hasegawa Y, Hasegawa M, Urade M. Comparison of joint pain in patients diagnosed with and without articular disc displacement without reduction based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 1