SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2

Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Postoperative Recovery Index of patients undergoing surgical intervention

Hande CENGİZ
Dilek AYGİN
Pages
566–573
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that the five-factor structure of the PoRI-TR, which was reduced from 37 items to 25, was adapted well.Conclusion: It was seen that the PoRI-TR is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: For the purpose of providing the optimal postoperative care for patients and assisting them in terms of recovery, theirhealth conditions and particular symptoms should be evaluated systematically with an appropriate measurement tool.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research wasdesigned with the purpose of conducting the validity and reliability study of the Postoperative Recovery Index-Turkish Version (PoRITR) and determining the postoperative recovery conditions.Materials and methods: The sample of this study, which was planned methodologically and analytically, consisted of 382 patientswho had a surgical intervention in a university hospital between September 2016 and June 2017.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that the five-factor structure of the PoRI-TR, which was reduced from 37 items to 25, was adapted well.Conclusion: It was seen that the PoRI-TR is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish patients.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: For the purpose of providing the optimal postoperative care for patients and assisting them in terms of recovery, theirhealth conditions and particular symptoms should be evaluated systematically with an appropriate measurement tool. This research wasdesigned with the purpose of conducting the validity and reliability study of the Postoperative Recovery Index-Turkish Version (PoRITR) and determining the postoperative recovery conditions.Materials and methods: The sample of this study, which was planned methodologically and analytically, consisted of 382 patientswho had a surgical intervention in a university hospital between September 2016 and June 2017. Analyses concerning the Turkishvalidity and reliability of the PoRI-TR were conducted. In the evaluation, a patient information form, the PoRI-TR, and the Quality ofRecovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40) were used.Results: The PoRI-TR point average was calculated as 3.39 ± 0.916 and the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient was calculated as α =0.967. It was determined that the five-factor structure of the PoRI-TR, which was reduced from 37 items to 25, was adapted well.Conclusion: It was seen that the PoRI-TR is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

CENGİZ, H., AYGİN, D. (2022). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Postoperative Recovery Index of patients undergoing surgical intervention. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 2, 566–573. https://ajindex.com/articles/610098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aslan FE. Cerrahi hemşireliğinin tarihçesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2009; 12: 104- 113 (in Turkish)
  2. Malley A, Kenner C, Kim T, Blakeney B. The role of the nurse and the preoperative assessment in patient transitions. AORN Journal 2015; 102: 181.e1-181.e9
  3. Gündoğdu H. Ameliyat sonrası iyileşmenin hızlandırılması. In: Sayek İ (editor). Temel Cerrahi. 4th ed. Ankara, Turkey: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2013. pp. 118-125 (in Turkish)
  4. Demirhan İ, Pınar G. Postoperatif iyileşmenin hızlandırılması ve hemşirelik yaklaşımları. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik E-Dergisi 2014; 2: 43-53 (in Turkish)
  5. Kabataş MS, Özbayır T. Kolorektal cerrahi sonrası hızlandırılmış iyileşme protokolü: sistematik derleme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2016; 5: 120- 132 (in Turkish)
  6. Aksoy G. Cerrahi ve cerrahi hemşireliği. In: Aksoy G, Kanan N, Akyolcu N (editors). Cerrahi Hemşireliği I., Genişletilmiş 2. Baskı. İstanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2017. pp. 203- 255 (in Turkish)
  7. Çilingir D, Candaş B. Cerrahi sonrası hızlandırılmış iyileşme protokolü ve hemşirenin rolü. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2017; 20: 137-143 (in Turkish)
  8. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet 2008; 372: 139-144
  9. Karaman S, Arici S, Dogru S, Karaman T, Tapar H et al. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2014; 12: 1-6
  10. Butler SF, Black RA, Techner L, Fernandez KC, Brooks D et al. Development and validation of the Post-Operative Recovery Index for measuring quality of recovery after surgery. Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research 2012; 3: 1-8
  11. Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000; 84: 11-15
  12. Büyüköztürk Ş. Faktör analizi: temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi 2002; 32: 470- 483 (in Turkish)
  13. Küçükgüçlü Ö, Esen A, Yener G. Bakım verenlerin yükü envanterinin Türk toplumu için geçerlik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesi. Journal of Neurological Sciences 2009; 26: 60-73 (in Turkish)
  14. Esin MN. Veri toplama yöntem ve araçları & veri toplama araçlarının güvenirlik ve geçerliği. In: Erdoğan S, Nahcivan N, Esi