Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of treatment response and mortality in septic shock patients in the intensive care unit

Pages
1336–1349
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

If the NLR was ≥15 on the 3rd day, the mortality oddsratio was 6.96 (CI: 1.4–34.1, P 15 on the 3rd day of postantibiotic initiation, the risk of mortality is high and treatment should be reviewed carefully.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied marker for predicting treatment response and mortality in sepsis,it was aimed to assess the efficacy of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of mortality and treatment response in sepsispatients in the intensive care unit (ICU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, sepsis patients were divided according to the presence of septic shockon the 1st day of ICU stay, and then subgrouped according to mortality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:If the NLR was ≥15 on the 3rd day, the mortality oddsratio was 6.96 (CI: 1.4–34.1, P 15 on the 3rd day of postantibiotic initiation, the risk of mortality is high and treatment should be reviewed carefully.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: While C-reactive protein (CRP) is a well-studied marker for predicting treatment response and mortality in sepsis,it was aimed to assess the efficacy of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of mortality and treatment response in sepsispatients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, sepsis patients were divided according to the presence of septic shockon the 1st day of ICU stay, and then subgrouped according to mortality. Patient demographics, acute physiologic and chronic healthevaluation II and sequential organ failure assessment scores, NLR and CRP (on the 1st, 3rd, and last day in the ICU), microbiology data,antibiotic responses, ICU data, and mortality were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the area under curve(AUC) were calculated for the inflammatory markers and ICU severity scores for mortality.Results: Of the 591 (65% male) enrolled patients, 111 (18.8%) were nonsurvivors with shock, 117 (19.8%) were survivors with shock,330 (55.8%) were survivors without shock, and 33 (5.6%) were nonsurvivors without shock. On the 1st day of ICU stay, the NLR andCRP were similar in all of the groups. On the 3rd day of antibiotic response, the NLR was increased (11.8) in the nonresponsive patientswhen compared with the partially responsive (11.0) and responsive (8.5) patients. If the NLR was ≥15 on the 3rd day, the mortality oddsratio was 6.96 (CI: 1.4–34.1, P 15 on the 3rd day of postantibiotic initiation, the risk of mortality is high and treatment should be reviewed carefully.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNGÖR, G., KARAKURT, Z., AY, M., SARI, R., ÇİYİLTEPE, F., MOÇİN, Ö. Y., KARGIN, F., SALTÜRK, C., ADIGÜZEL, N., ÇELİK, M. E., TEKAN, Ü. Y. (2022). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of treatment response and mortality in septic shock patients in the intensive care unit. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 5, 1336–1349. https://ajindex.com/articles/610096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. 1992
  2. 101 (6): 1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 2. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Critical Care Medicine 2003
  3. 31 (4): 1250-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000050454.01978.3B 3. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 2004
  4. 32 (3): 858-73. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000117317.18092.E4 4. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical Care Medicine 2013
  5. 41 (2): 580-637. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0b013e31827e83af. 5. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE-acute physiology and chronic health evaluation: a physiologically based classification system. Critical Care Medicine 1981
  6. 9 (8): 591-7. 6. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Medicine 1996
  7. 22 (7): 707-10. 7. Henriquez-Camacho C, Losa J. Biomarkers for sepsis. Biomed Research International 2014
  8. 547818. doi: 10.1155/2014/547818 8. Pierrakos C, Vincent JL Sepsis biomarkers: a review. Critical Care 2010
  9. 14 (1): R15. doi: 10.1186/cc8872. 9. Lichtenstern C, Brenner T, Bardenheuer HJ, Weigand MA. Predictors of survival in sepsis: what is the best inflammatory marker to measure? Current Opinion Infectious Diseases 2012
  10. 25 (3): 328-36. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283522038. 10. Jolivet P, Christen G, Seematter G, Que YA, Eggimann P. Usefulness of biomarkers of sepsis in the ICU. Revue Medicale Suisse 2011
  11. 7 (321): 2430-4. 11. Wacker C, Prkno A, Brunkhorst FM, Schlattmann P. Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infectious Disease. 2013
  12. 13 (5): 426-35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70323-7. 12. Ma Y, Mao Y, He X, Sun Y, Huang S et al. The values of neutrophil to lym