Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C)

Pages
162–169
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All CITCs were >0.20.Conclusion: The PAQ-C is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for Turkish children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) is one of the most frequently used questionnairesfor evaluating moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to create a Turkish version of the PAQ-C and examine its psychometric characteristics and factor structure.Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 784 primary school students (ages 9–14 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All CITCs were >0.20.Conclusion: The PAQ-C is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for Turkish children.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) is one of the most frequently used questionnairesfor evaluating moderate to vigorous levels of physical activity in children. However, a Turkish version of the questionnaire was notavailable. This study aimed to create a Turkish version of the PAQ-C and examine its psychometric characteristics and factor structure.Materials and methods: The study was conducted with 784 primary school students (ages 9–14 years). The PAQ-C was examined forcontent and construct validity and analyzed in terms of reliability. Content validity was evaluated with the content validity index (CVI),construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 388), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (n = 396). For reliability analysis,Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The factor construct was assessed with corrected itemtotal correlations (CITCs).Results: The CVI for the PAQ-C was 0.95. EFA revealed a two-factor construct of ‘at school’ and ‘extracurricular’. CFA confirmed thetwo-factor construct. Factor loadings varied between 0.41 and 0.80. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.77 and ICC was 0.91 for the test-retest forthe entire sample. All CITCs were >0.20.Conclusion: The PAQ-C is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used for Turkish children.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUĞUOĞLU, S., ERGÜN, A., ERDİM, L. (2022). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 162–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/610063

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report Strategies to Increase Physical Activity Among Youth. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2012
  2. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Hawkins J, Queen B, Lowry R, Olsen EO, Chyen D et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016; 65:1-174
  3. Erginöz E, Alikaşifoğlu M, Ercan O, Uysal Ö, Ekici B, Albayrak DK, Gülşah O, Yücel İ, Ocak S. Relationship between physical activity level and demographic characteristics, eating habits and sedantary behaviors of Turkish school children aged 11, 13 and 15 years. Turk Arch Ped 2011; 46:12-19 (article in Turkish with an abstract in English)
  4. Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med 2001; 31:439-454
  5. Bervoets L, Noten CV, Roosbroeck SV, Hansen D, Hoorenbeeck KV, Verheyen E, Hal GV, Vankerckhoven V. Reliability and validity of the Dutch physical activity questionnaires for children (PAQ-C) and adolescents (PAQ-A). Arch Public Health 2014; 72: 47
  6. Kowalski KC, Crocker PRE, Donen RM. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) Manual. Saskatoon, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2004
  7. Crocker PR, Bailey DA, Faulkner RA, Kowalski KC, McGrath R. Measuring general levels of physical activity: preliminary evidence for the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29: 1344-1349
  8. Kowalski KC, Crocker PRE, Faulkner RA. Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatr Exerc Sci 1997; 9: 174-186
  9. Moore JB, Hanes JC Jr, Barbeau P, Gutin B, Treviño RP, Yin Z. Validation of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children in children of different races. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2007; 19: 6-19
  10. Janz KF, Lutuchy EM, Wenthe P, Levy SM. Measuring activity in children and adolescent using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 767-772
  11. Faghihimani Z, Nourian M, Nikkar AH, Farajzadegan Z, Khavariyan N, Ghatrehsamani S, Poursafa P, Kelishadi R. Validation of the child and adolescent international physical activity questionnaires in Iranian children and adolescents. ARYA Atherosclerosis Journal 2010; 5: 163-166
  12. Thomas EL, Upton D. Psychometric properties of the physical activity questionnaire for older children (PAQ-C) in the UK. Psychology of Spor