Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4

Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic fields on pain, disability, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical disc herniation: a randomized controlled study

Pages
1095–1101
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, in the comparison between changes within groups, significantimprovements were determined only in the VAS and Nottingham Health Profile sleep subparameter in the 12th week after treatmentcompared to those before treatment.Conclusion: PEMF therapy in cervical disc herniation can be used safely in routine treatment in addition to conventional physicaltherapy modalities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy on pain, disability,psychological state, and quality of life in cervical disc herniation.Materials and methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, including Group 1, which received a therapy consisting oftranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hot pack (HP), and PEMF, and Group 2, which received a magnetic field (shammagnetic field) without current flow in addition to TENS and HP therapy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10cm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, in the comparison between changes within groups, significantimprovements were determined only in the VAS and Nottingham Health Profile sleep subparameter in the 12th week after treatmentcompared to those before treatment.Conclusion: PEMF therapy in cervical disc herniation can be used safely in routine treatment in addition to conventional physicaltherapy modalities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy on pain, disability,psychological state, and quality of life in cervical disc herniation.Materials and methods: Patients were randomly divided into two groups, including Group 1, which received a therapy consisting oftranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), hot pack (HP), and PEMF, and Group 2, which received a magnetic field (shammagnetic field) without current flow in addition to TENS and HP therapy. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS, 0–10cm). The other outcome measures were function (Neck Pain and Disability Scale), anxiety-depressive mood (Hospital Anxiety andDepression Scale), and quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile). All evaluations were performed at baseline, in the 3rd week, and inthe 12th week after treatment.Results: A significant improvement was found in the neck pain, disability, depression, anxiety, and quality of life scores of both groupsafter treatment when compared to those before treatment. However, in the comparison between changes within groups, significantimprovements were determined only in the VAS and Nottingham Health Profile sleep subparameter in the 12th week after treatmentcompared to those before treatment.Conclusion: PEMF therapy in cervical disc herniation can be used safely in routine treatment in addition to conventional physicaltherapy modalities.

🔖

Cite This Article

EM, S., DİLEK, B., KARAKOÇ, M., ÇEVİK, R., BATMAZ, İ., HATTAPOĞLU, E. (2022). Efficiency of pulsed electromagnetic fields on pain, disability, anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with cervical disc herniation: a randomized controlled study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 4, 1095–1101. https://ajindex.com/articles/610030

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Luo X, Edwards CL, Richardson W, Hey L. Relationship of clinical, psychologic, and individual factors with the functional status of neck pain patients. Value in Health 2004
  2. 7 (1): 61-69. doi: 1098-3015/04/$15.00/61 2. Fejer R, Hartvigsen J. Neck pain and disability due to neck pain: what is the relation? European Spine Journal 2008
  3. 17 (1): 80-88. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0521-9 3. Richardson SM. Intervertebral disc biology, degeneration and novel tissue engineering and regenerative medicine therapies. Histology and Histopathology 2007
  4. 22 (9): 1033-1041. doi: 10.14670/HH-22.1033 4. Martinez-Rondanelli A, Martinez JP, Moncada ME, Manzi E, Pinedo CR et al. Electromagnetic stimulation as coadjuvant in the healing of diaphyseal femoral fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Colombia Medica 2014
  5. 45 (2): 67-71. 5. Mohammadi R, Faraji D, Alemi H, Mokarizadeh A. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate functional recovery of transected sciatic nerve bridged by chitosan conduit: an animal model study. International Journal of Surgery 2014
  6. 12 (12): 1278-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.004 6. Li S, Yu B, Zhou D, He C, Zhuo Q et al. Electromagnetic fields for treating osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013
  7. 14 (12): CD003523. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD003523.pub2 7. Maestu C, Blanco M, Nevado A, Romero J, Rodriguez-Rubio P et al. Reduction of pain thresholds in fibromyalgia after very low-intensity magnetic stimulation: a double-blinded, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain Research & Management 2013
  8. 18 (6): 101-106. 8. Giusti A, Giovale M, Ponte M, Fratoni F, Tortorolo U et al. Short-term effect of low-intensity, pulsed, electromagnetic fields on gait characteristics in older adults with low bone mineral density: a pilot randomized-controlled trial. Geriatrics & Gerontology International 2013
  9. 13 (2): 393-397. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00915.x 9. Alper S. Akupunktur, lazer ve magnetoterapi. In: Beyazova M, Kutsal YG (editors). Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Güneş Kitabevi
  10. pp. 820-830 (in Turkish). 10. Akgün K. Manyetik alan tedavisi. In: Sarı H, Tüzün Ş, Akgün K (editors). Hareket Sistemi Hastalıklarında Fiziksel Tıp Yöntemleri. 1st ed. İstanbul, Turkey: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi
  11. pp. 65-72 (in Turkish). 11. Nazlıkul H. Magnetoterapi (manyetik alan tedavisi). In: Nazlıkul H (editor). Detoksu Keşfet. 1st ed. İstanbul, Turkey: Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım
  12. pp. 291-294. 12. Rometsch M. M