Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in an urban population of Sivas province in Turkey

Pages
288–294
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prevalence of MS was 288 per 100,000 inhabitants.Conclusion: For future studies, these high ratio results can be used in regional and national comparisons to determine cofactorscontributing to the high prevalence of MS in our region and can help health-decision makers to better plan healthcare policies toimprove neurological services and awareness about multifaceted clinical presentations of MS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common neurological disorder that can be a leading cause of nontraumatic disability inseveral countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Recent reports have indicated a moderate to high risk of MS in European countries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prevalence of MS was 288 per 100,000 inhabitants.Conclusion: For future studies, these high ratio results can be used in regional and national comparisons to determine cofactorscontributing to the high prevalence of MS in our region and can help health-decision makers to better plan healthcare policies toimprove neurological services and awareness about multifaceted clinical presentations of MS.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background/aim: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common neurological disorder that can be a leading cause of nontraumatic disability inseveral countries. Recent reports have indicated a moderate to high risk of MS in European countries. In this study, we examined theprevalence of MS in a well-defined urban population of provincial center in Sivas Province in Turkey.Materials and methods: This study sampled all registered residents of urban areas of provincial center in Sivas Province in April 2017and 2018 January. All the included patients met the McDonald 2010 criteria. Medical records were reviewed, including all availablepreviously acquired magnetic resonance imaging data. All patients were subsequently subjected to neurologic examination to confirmthe MS diagnosis.Results: We identified 21 possible MS patients, with MS diagnosis confirmed in 19. The prevalence of MS was 288 per 100,000 inhabitants.Conclusion: For future studies, these high ratio results can be used in regional and national comparisons to determine cofactorscontributing to the high prevalence of MS in our region and can help health-decision makers to better plan healthcare policies toimprove neurological services and awareness about multifaceted clinical presentations of MS.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOLAYIR, A., YILDIZ, Ö. K., BALABAN, H., GÖKÇE, Ş. F., KARACA, S. N., TOPAKTAŞ, A. S., ÇİĞDEM, B. (2022). Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in an urban population of Sivas province in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 288–294. https://ajindex.com/articles/610021

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Luzzio C. (2018) Multiple sclerosis. [online] Emedicine. medscape.com. Available at: emedicine.medscape.com/ article/1146199-overview [Accessed 3 Aug. 2018]
  2. Browne P, Chandraratna D, Angood C, Tremlett H, Baker C et al. Atlas of multiple sclerosis 2013: a growing global problem with widespread inequity. Neurology 2014; 83: 1022-1024
  3. Cristiano E, Patrucco L, Rojas JI. A systematic review of the epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in South America. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15: 1273-1278
  4. Garg N, Smith TW. An update on immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of multiple sclerosis. Brain Behav 2015; 5: e0036214
  5. Rosati G. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the world: an update. Neurol Sci 2001; 22: 117-139
  6. Kalincik T, Vivek V, Jokubaitis V, Lechner-Scott J, Trojano M et al. Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2013; 136: 3609-3617
  7. Sadovnick AD, Yee IM, Guimond C, Reis J, Dyment DA et al. Age of onset in concordant twins and other relative pairs with multiple sclerosis. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 170: 289-296
  8. Olek MJ. Differential diagnosis, clinical features, and prognosis of multiple sclerosis. In: Olek MJ, editor. Multiple Sclerosis Etiology, Diagnosis, and New Treatment Strategies. Totowa, NJ, USA: Humana Press; 2005. pp. 15-53
  9. Ashtari F, Shaygannejad V, Farajzadegan Z, Amin A. Does early-onset multiple sclerosis differ from adult-onset form in Iranian people. J Res Med Sci 2010; 15: 94-99
  10. Alroughani R, Ahmed SF, Behbahani R, Khan R, Thussu A et al. Increasing prevalence and incidence rates of multiple sclerosis in Kuwait. Mult Scler 2014; 20: 543-547
  11. Deleu D, Mir D, Al Tabouki A, Mesraoua R, Mesraoua B et al. Prevalence, demographics and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis in Qatar. Mult Scler 2013; 19: 816-819
  12. Kalanie H, Gharagozli K, Kalanie AR. Multiple sclerosis: report on 200 cases from Iran. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 36-38
  13. Ha-Vinh P, Nauleau S, Clementz M, Régnard P, Sauze L et al. Geographic variations of multiple sclerosis prevalence in France: the latitude gradient is not uniform depending on the socioeconomic status of the studied population. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 2016; 2: 2055217316631762
  14. Howard J, Trevick S, Younger DS. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2016; 34: 919-939
  15. Kotzamani D, Panou T, Mastorodemos V, Tzagournissakis M, Nikolakaki H et al. Rising incidence of multiple sclerosis in females associat